HIMI Preferred Indices

HIMIPref™ Indices : October 29, 1999

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1999-10-29
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,526.1 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,613.8 7 2.00 4.63% 15.9 197M 5.17%
Floater 1,437.0 4 1.77 4.47% 15.2 52M 5.21%
OpRet 1,366.2 32 1.22 5.32% 3.6 57M 6.30%
SplitShare 1,410.6 4 1.50 5.57% 6.8 61M 5.50%
Interest-Bearing 1,453.3 6 2.00 7.97% 10.4 433M 8.20%
Perpetual-Premium 1,180.8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perpetual-Discount 1,208.9 13 1.53 5.86% 14.1 143M 6.18%

Index Constitution, 1999-10-29, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1999-10-29, Post-rebalancing

Errata, 2007-08-24: The credit rating of IQI.PR.A in the Fixed-Floater index is reported incorrectly; it should not have been included in the index as the actual DBRS rating on this date was Pfd-3(high).

Issue Comments

BAM.PR.N : Blow-out sale underway?

It has been a long time coming – and  the fund invested too early, as I can now tell with benefit of hindsight – but as of noonish today, 80,669 shares of BAM.PR.N have traded; it’s currently quoted at 19.46-60, 3×81.

It’s either a blow-out sale or a panic-stricken margin call!

BAM.PR.M has traded 1,700 and is quoted at 20.85-86, 5×18 … so investors can now swap virtually identical instruments and take out $1.25 … although, admittedly, the potential volume that could be done on the M side at these levels is probably extremely limited.

Market Action

August 16, 2007

Well, let’s all be happy that day’s done, shall we?

Canadian equities are now down on the year, notwithstanding a monster rally that took it up almost 400 points from the lows.

A record 708.1 million shares changed hands in trading on Toronto today, surpassing the previous record of 499.8 million set on July 12, according to an e-mailed statement. The number of trades was 996,311, exceeding the 707,853 made Aug. 10.

Similarly:

NYSE Euronext (NYSE Euronext: NYX), the world’s largest and most liquid exchange group, today reported record transaction volume in its U.S. cash equities trading operations on NYSE Group exchanges with 5.73 billion shares traded, based on preliminary results.  Additionally, the NYSE also achieved new records in orders, trades and quotes.

So far this month, trading volume on NYSE Group U.S. cash equities markets in August 2007 is 110% higher than August 2006.

as US Equities plunged, then rocketted to close slightly up on the day.

Moody’s warned that a LTCM-like collapse is not entirely out of bounds, and a Wall Street type warned that Moody’s isn’t invited to his next birthday party:

“To see Moody’s make forward-looking negative statements about hedge funds, who may well be suffering in large part as a result of their reliance on Moody’s now evidently worthless ratings, is to witness the height of chutzpah.”

He’s not alone, as Sarkozy wants an investigation into Moody’s. There is, as yet, no indication as to whether Sarkozy will be investigating asset managers who underperformed their benchmarks; Sarkozy’s track record was not disclosed. I am willing to bet that Gary Jenkins will also be relieved that he will not necessarily be investigated:

“Rating agencies should be regulated and they should be paid by the investor — not by the issuer, not by the structurer,” said Gary Jenkins, a partner at London-based hedge fund Synapse Investment Management, which manages $650 million of debt assets. “It’s so obvious, so simple that it’s the one thing that probably won’t happen. They shouldn’t be paid by the people selling the bonds.”

There are others who have the maturity and personal integrity to resist the temptation to blame the rating agencies: they blame the Fed:

The result: a crisis of confidence among investors who say Bernanke must abandon his focus on inflation and prevent a deeper slide in markets that endangers economic growth.

To restore my limited faith in humanity, there is at least one other person arguing, in effect: ‘Sure, the financial markets are risky. That’s what they’re for.’

All the money the Fed has pumped in seems to be going into T-Bills, which wasn’t quite what they had in mind.

The yield on the three-month Treasury bill tumbled 0.48 percentage point today to 3.62 percent, after falling 0.54 percentage point yesterday.

The money certainly didn’t go into the Commercial Paper market, which shrank significantly. About time – have a look at the actual Fed data, particularly the “Outstandings”. It would be a mistake to draw any conclusions from data without investigating further … but boy, it sure looks as if reliance on short-term funding in the US has increased a lot over the past five years!

Amidst all the equity fear and flight to safety, Treasuries had a monster day, and the 2-10 spread widened slightly to 45bp from 44bp yesterday. Given a gappy day like today, though, a lousy beep doesn’t mean too much. Canadas were much more restrained, with more steepening, the 2-10 spread increasing from 14bp to 17bp. Actual corporate bonds are still extremely illiquid.

The Yen did well, on what is presumed to be carry-trade unwinding; outlook for the USD is still probably grim.

There was cheering in the streets early on, as banking executives from all walks of life celebrated what I think must the demise of a competitor … er, I mean, they were happy that investors aren’t being wiped out in the restructuring of the Coventry funds. The commercial paper will be converted into floating rate notes with a maturity matching that of the underlying assets; if you want to pick up a little money-market yield by investing in Asset Backed paper in the future, you are now much more likely to purchase a rock-solid security, issued by a rock-solid trust. One that’s run by, um, a bank.

Given the events of the day – corporates in general not seeing much action; stocks getting hit; retail assuming that a preferred share is simply an equity that hasn’t gone down yet – it should be no surprise that the pref market did not do very well. As has often been the case lately, the Pfd-3(high) & lower issues took a hammering [which makes more sense than the higher issues getting hurt, anyway!]: NTL.PR.G, -5.33%; DW.PR.A, -5.27%; CCS.PR.C, -4.42%; STQ.E, -4.30%; YLD.PR.B, -3.81%; WN.PR.C, -3.61%; BBD.PR.C, -3.30%; BBD.PR.B, -3.18%; WN.PR.E, -2.56%; BBD.PR.D, -2.38%; NTL.PR.F, -1.81%; CGQ.E, -1.56%; WN.PR.D, -1.53%; BPO.PR.K, -1.47%; YPG.PR.A, -1.02%.

I’m not trying to pick on the junky stuff, there are lots of investment grade issues listed below! There was one junky gainer, IQW.PR.D, +1.92%.

Lets have another look at the junky-but-not-quite-junk sampler:

Pfd-3 Comparables
Issue EPP.PR.A WN.PR.E YPG.PR.B
Quote, 7/25 20.80-20 20.31-68 23.05-15
Quote, 8/16 20.00-65 19.40-77 22.40-59
Return (b/b) for period -3.85% -4.48% -2.82%
Pre-Tax Bid-YTW, 8/15 6.21% 6.22% 6.62%
Note: None of these issues has had an ex-Date in the period.
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.75% 4.79% 24,193 15.95 1 0.0000% 1,040.3
Fixed-Floater 5.01% 4.93% 120,165 15.71 8 -0.0816% 1,016.5
Floater 4.94% 2.75% 72,179 8.01 4 -0.4131% 1,035.8
Op. Retract 4.85% 4.18% 81,065 3.19 16 -0.3616% 1,019.7
Split-Share 5.11% 5.04% 99,431 4.09 15 -0.4778% 1,032.4
Interest Bearing 6.28% 6.82% 65,605 4.59 3 -0.4074% 1,027.4
Perpetual-Premium 5.57% 5.33% 99,665 7.85 24 -0.1841% 1,017.2
Perpetual-Discount 5.14% 5.18% 294,876 15.19 39 -0.5956% 964.2
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
FTU.PR.A SplitShare -3.2227% Asset coverage of slightly under 2.1:1 as of July 31, according to Quadravest. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.52% based on a bid of 9.91 and a hardMaturity 2012-12-1 at 10.00.
BNA.PR.C SplitShare -2.7527% The last trade was for 300 shares at 23.49. The penultimate trade was for 500 shares at 22.61. It was that kind of day. Closed at 22.61-49, 15×28. Asset coverage was just under 4.2:1 as of 2007-3-31, according to the company. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.63% based on a bid of 22.61 and a hardMaturity 2019-1-10 at 25.00.
PWF.PR.K PerpetualDiscount -2.6050% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.38% based on a bid of 23.18 and a limitMatuirty.
POW.PR.B PerpetualDiscount -2.1951% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.61% based on a bid of 24.06 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.E OpRet -1.9868% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.72% based on a bid of 25.16 and a softMaturity 2014-3-30 at 25.00.
PWF.PR.J OpRet -1.8224% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.52% based on a bid of 25.32 and a softMaturity 2013-7-30 at 25.00.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount -1.7817% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.17% based on a bid of 22.05 and a limitMaturity.
LBS.PR.A SplitShare -1.5549% Asset coverage of a little over 2.4:1 as of August 9, according to Brompton Group. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.12% based on a bid of 10.13 and a hardMaturity 2013-11-29 at 10.00.
BMO.PR.J PerpetualDiscount -1.5487% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.07% based on a bid of 22.25 and a limitMaturity.
CIU.PR.A PerptualDiscount -1.4518% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.15% based on a bid of 22.40 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.K Floater -1.3923%  
MFC.PR.A OpRet -1.3211% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.83% based on a bid of 25.42 and a softMaturity 2015-12-18 at 25.00.
RY.PR.E PerpetualDiscount -1.3100% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.99% based on a bid of 22.60 and a limitMaturity.
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing -1.2945% Asset coverage of slightly over 1.8:1 as of August 10, according to Brookfield Funds. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.73% based on a bid of 9.15 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00
BMO.PR.H PerpetualPremium -1.2195% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.19% based on a bid of 25.11 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.J PerpetualDiscount -1.1515% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.08% based on a bid of 22.32 and a limitMaturity.
PWF.PR.F PerpetualDiscount -1.1304% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.39% based on a bid of 24.49 and a limitMaturity.
POW.PR.D PerpetualDiscount -1.0938% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.37% based on a bid of 23.51 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.N PerpetualDiscount -1.0417% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.05% based on a bid of 19.95 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.P PerpetualPremium -1.0168% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.33% based on a bid of 25.31 and a call 2012-11-28 at 25.00.
ELF.PR.F PerpetualDiscount +1.0612% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.40% based on a bid of 24.76 and a limitMaturity.
CFS.PR.A SplitShare +2.50% Asset coverage of slightly over 2.2:1 as of August 10, according to CC&L. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.74% based on a bid of 10.25 and a hardMaturity 2012-1-31 at 10.00
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
BMO.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 30,900 See “Price Movers”, above.
ACO.PR.A OpRet 30,055 Scotia crossed 25,000 at 26.55. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.79% based on a bid of 26.51 and a call 2009-12-31 at 25.50.
BNS.PR.L PerpetualDiscount 23,670 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.95% based on a bid of 22.91 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.J PerpetualDiscount 23,150 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.08% based on a bid of 22.32 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 22,160 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.19% based on a bid of 22.85 and a limitMaturity.

There were eleven other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Market Action

August 15, 2007

Not quite so many links as has been the case lately, thank heavens, but those that I am going to put up are of exceptional interest … so read carefully!

Coventree was able to roll $600-million worth of paper today, which is good news, but noted:

“This ABCP was purchased primarily by investors who elected to renew or roll over their ABCP that matured (Tuesday),” Coventree stated.

I suspect there’s something of Mexican standoff implicit in the above remarks … if Coventree had to enter CCAA Protection it would be worse for both the company and the creditors.

There was a hint that much the same thing might be happening in the States, with Countrywide Financial stock plunging when Merrill Lynch changed its recommendation from “Buy” to “Sell” based on liquidity concerns. The analyst’s track-record was not disclosed. As in many such cases, this accellerated concerns to the point of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy:

Countrywide credit-default swaps soared 225 basis points to 600 basis points, according to broker Phoenix Partners Group. That means it costs $600,000 a year to protect $10 million of Countrywide bonds from default for five years. The contracts have risen more than sixfold in the past month.  

The rout intensified after CNBC reported that Countrywide’s 30-day asset-backed commercial paper was being quoted by dealers at a 12.54 percent yield. The company previously borrowed at 15 basis points, or 0.15 percentage point, over the London interbank offered rate, which currently is about 5.57 percent for 30-day borrowings, the cable-television network reported

Even one of the bond market’s golden boys is affected, though admittedly the damage is largely self-inflicted: Nestle lost its triple-A status:

Nestle’s was cut one level to AA+ by Fitch and to Aa1 by Moody’s after the Vevey, Switzerland-based company said it plans to repurchase 25 billion Swiss francs ($21 billion) of stock, its biggest-ever share buyback. The downgrade leaves only Johnson & Johnson, Toyota Motor Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corp. holding AAA ratings from both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s as well as Fitch.

In late news that might broil the markets tomorrow:

Australia’s Rams Home Loans Group Ltd. has been unable to refinance A$6.17 billion ($5 billion) of short-term U.S. loans because of a “lack of market liquidity” caused by the global credit rout.

Rams cited the “tightening of the global credit markets” for failing to sell the so-called extendable commercial paper, the company’s largest source of funding for its loans, it said in a statement today.

The lender has been given temporary funding of A$1 billion by two of its providers, Rams said.

In turn, both American and Canadian equities tanked. Today’s fearless prediction: pundits in tomorrow’s paper will note that the Canadian index is now more than 10% off its peak, meeting the generally accepted definition of a “correction”.

Reminds me of my back-office days back in 1987. I was asked quite seriously if I thought the 502-point drop in the Dow was a “crash” or a “correction”. I said I thought it meant the Dow was down 502 points, which wasn’t considered a particularly penetrating answer.

All the angst got the central banks moving. The Bank of Canada lowered its standards for repurchase agreements and the current month Fed Futures are now showing an expectation of an average Fed Funds rate for August (this month! August!) of 4.99%, twenty-six bps below target. This follows disclosure that the dollar-weighted average of actual Fed Funds transactions yesterday was 4.54%, with a low of half a point. We can be thankful that inflation numbers were benign and were met with cheers. A Fed governor, Poole, reminded the markets not to take anything for granted – the Fed cares about the real economy, not bit of Wall Street paper.

Given the de facto easing, it is not surpising that Treasuries had a really good day, with the two-year yield declining six basis points, although the spoil-sports trading ten-years took yield up 1bp, for a marked steeping. Canadas did not behave in anywhere near so dramatic a fashion, but 2-10 still steepened 2.3bp.

Rotten day in the preferred market, with all but one of the indices down on the day – and that one (FixFloat) was due to exceptional performance by BCE.PR.T, which accomplished this feat on zero volume. It’s very tempting to try to read something into this performance; but then again, in such a retail dominated market, strange things can happen.

Again, lack of interest in the lower rated credits was noticable, with the following performance stand-outs: YLD.PR.B, -4.55%; IQW.PR.D, -4.43%; HPF.PR.B, -4.26%; STQ.E, -3.01%; IQW.PR.C, -2.83%; DC.PR.A, -2.29%; GT.PR.A, -2.15%; NTL.PR.F, -2.07%; BBD.PR.C, -1.40%; BBD.PR.B, -1.32%; BPO.PR.J, -1.22%; and YPG.PR.A, -1.09%. Some of the lower rated credits bounced, but not many: WN.PR.C, +1.06%; WN.PR.D, +1.41%.

Just for fun, I’ll update the ‘Junky but not quite junk’ list (and remember, this is not representative! While the selections were not entirely random, they’re not entirely representative, either!).

Pfd-3 Comparables
Issue EPP.PR.A WN.PR.E YPG.PR.B
Quote, 7/25 20.80-20 20.31-68 23.05-15
Quote, 8/15 20.20-70 19.91-07 22.40-50
Return (b/b) for period -2.88% -1.97% -2.82%
Pre-Tax Bid-YTW, 8/15 6.15% 6.06% 6.62% 
Note: None of these issues has had an ex-Date in the period.
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.75% 4.79% 25,177 15.96 1 -0.0411% 1,040.3
Fixed-Floater 5.01% 4.94% 121,361 15.69 8 +0.0877% 1,017.3
Floater 4.92% 2.12% 74,048 8.07 4 -0.2299% 1,040.1
Op. Retract 4.83% 4.13% 81,197 3.20 16 -0.1687% 1,023.4
Split-Share 5.09% 4.90% 99,536 3.88 15 -0.3190% 1,037.4
Interest Bearing 6.25% 6.76% 64,462 4.61 3 -0.3389% 1,031.6
Perpetual-Premium 5.56% 5.29% 99,078 6.60 24 -0.1247% 1,019.1
Perpetual-Discount 5.11% 5.15% 296,980 15.23 39 -0.4558% 969.9
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.K PerpetualDiscount -2.2186% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.24% based on a bid of 23.80 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.H PerpetualDiscount -2.0877% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.16% based on a bid of 23.45 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.N PerpetualDiscount -1.4181% Closed at 20.16-29, which is rather odd, I think, given that BAM.PR.M closed at 20.85-00. These issues are identical except for the start of the redemption schedule – BAM.PR.N starts six months later, which is better. However, BAM.PR.N is still attempting to cope with a horrible reception at issue time. MAPF has a position. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.99% based on a bid of 20.16 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.D PerpetualDiscount -1.4172% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.07% based on a bid of 22.26 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.R PerpetualPremium -1.2476% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.59% based on a bid of 25.66 and a softMaturity 2013-4-29 at 25.00.
LBS.PR.A SplitShare -1.2476% Asset coverage of a little over 2.4:1 as of August 9, according to Brompton Group. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.82% based on a bid of 10.29 and a hardMaturity 2013-11-29 at 10.00.
BAM.PR.G FixFloat -1.2422%  
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.1885%  
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing -1.0672% Asset coverage of slightly over 1.8:1 as of August 10, according to Brookfield Funds. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.51% (mostly as interest) based on a bid of 9.27 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
BCE.PR.T FixFloat +1.2129% On ZERO volume, but enough to keep the FixFloat index from negativity!
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
MFC.PR.C PerpetualDiscount 61,290 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.94% based on a bid of 23.10 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.F PerpetualPremium 51,688 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.52% based on a bid of 26.85 and a call 2008-10-30 at 26.00. There are some, obviously, who are willing to bet it won’t be called!
NA.PR.L PerpetualDiscount 43,100 Nesbitt crossed 25,000 at 24.10. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.05% based on a bid of 24.10 and a limitMaturity.
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 41,175 National Bank bought a total of 29,000 in the late afternoon, including a cross of 25,000 at 22.99. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.93% based on a bid of 23.00 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 37,400 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.08% based on a bid of 22.45 and a limitMaturity.

There were fifteen other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

HIMI Preferred Indices

HIMIPref™ Indices : September 30, 1999

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1999-09-30
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,535.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,626.1 7 2.00 4.72% 16.0 172M 5.12%
Floater 1,445.8 3 1.68 5.00% 15.4 52M 5.42%
OpRet 1,380.7 31 1.16 5.06% 3.2 61M 6.17%
SplitShare 1,399.8 4 1.49 5.57% 6.6 43M 5.52%
Interest-Bearing 1,463.6 5 2.00 7.86% 10.5 646M 8.19%
Perpetual-Premium 1,193.2 1 1.00 7.46% 0.2 42M 8.84%
Perpetual-Discount 1,232.7 12 1.58 5.73% 14.3 175M 5.79%

Index Constitution, 1999-09-30, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1999-09-30, Post-rebalancing

Market Action

August 14, 2007

I have another barrage of links for you today, so brace yourselves.

First, the obligatory Canadian news: Peter MacKay is no longer the Minister in Charge of Signing Agreements and is now the Minister in Charge of Shooting Off. What his dog thinks of the change was not disclosed.

BCE has filed its proxy statement and disclosed that financing for the takeover is coming from Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, The Royal Bank of Scotland and the Toronto-Dominion Bank. Now, it’s very nice to have financing committments, but they don’t necessarily mean anything. The Sallie Mae takeover is in trouble, with the borrowing buyers attempting to use an escape clause and the salivating sellers trying to slam it shut. Years of litigation ahead on that one, I’ll bet.

One of the financing consortium, Citigroup was in the news today.

Citigroup Inc., the biggest U.S. bank by assets, may forfeit as much as $1 billion of third- quarter profit because of the credit crunch in mortgages and high-yield debt, according to analysts at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC.

“The key question is how the market absorbs deals coming in September, when spreads may widen out to July levels or worse, or may renormalize, with spreads coming in to June levels,” the analysts wrote.

Mason and Howard said mark-to-market losses on leveraged loans in July could have been 15 percent to 20 percent. Lending spreads have tightened so far in August, they said.

Citigroup is the third-ranked provider of leveraged loans in the U.S. this year, behind JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp., according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Conventree is claiming that back-up liquidity providers for its commercial paper programme are refusing to provide back-up liquidity … lawsuits ahead there!

European Central Bank intervention eased off amid hopes that conditions are adjusting. Robert Eisenbeis thinks the ECB was too easy on the market.

It is being argued that central banks should actually make markets in instruments that have suddenly become illiquid … I don’t buy it. That’s the private sector’s job … central banks, as I said yesterday, can and should ensure that the biggest, best capitalized financial market intermediaries can make their decisions without having to get particularly nervous about their financing.

I also don’t buy recommendations that the ceiling on mortgage insurance be increased. The maximum mortgage that the agencies can buy is USD 417,000. Sorry! Anybody who’s taking out a mortgage in excess of USD 417,000 doesn’t need government help, implicit or otherwise. Insuring or providing loans of that size to individuals should be strictly private sector.

There was a comment reported by Bloomberg:

“Something that’s triple-A clearly shouldn’t be this volatile,” David Watts, an analyst at bond research firm CreditSights Inc. in London, said.

It may be that the Bloomberg reporter wrote the story to imply deprecation of the AAA ratings, but I hope the explanation for that remark is that he was deprecating the market. I agree with the other guy:

Ratings are “a measure of risk on a buy-and-hold basis and say nothing about the pricing volatility of an investment,” said Gareth Levington, a senior analyst at Moody’s in London. “The market level isn’t hugely relevant for the rating.”

Now for the really interesting stuff: Fed Funds. Truly one of the wildest and interesting sectors of the market, but not usually. Today Fed Funds Futures for the current month closed at 94.96, indicating that the market feels the average rate on Fed Funds for August will be 5.04%. Given that the Fed Funds target rate is 5.25%, this seems very strange indeed. But there are rumours that an emergency cut is imminent and there are more than just rumours. Federal Reserve Data indicates that the actual average rate so far in August has been about 5.17%; on 8/10 the Effective Rate was 4.68% and on 8/13 the ER was 4.81%. On both those days, the low for the day was 0%. So roll that up and smoke it … the interventions have had some effect! I found another primer on how this works, for those who are interested.

Potential cuts in the Fed Funds rate got a boost from mild US Inflation data which is projected by many to come inside the Fed’s comfort zone. Exports are up, which is logical since emerging nations are the only ones who have any money.

Sub-prime is even affecting national currencies … the Kiwi/Yen carry trade is losing popularity and funds are pouring into the US dollar.

With all this going on, Walmart’s profit warning ushered in every-day discounts on US Equities and financials led the crap-out in Canada.

There was continued flight to quality and curve-steepening in both Treasuries and Canadas. US Investment-Grade corporates narrowed in a little.

A lot of lower grade credits in the preferred share market got hit today: WN.PR.D, -3.49%; DW.PR.A, -2.46%; WN.PR.C, -1.72%; DC.PR.A, -1.55%; YPG.PR.B, -1.53%; STR.E, -1.35%; IQW.PR.D, -1.19%. This illustrates my theme of minimizing exposure to the Pfd-3-type credits!

Just for fun, I’ll update my recent comparable list:

Pfd-3 Comparables
Issue EPP.PR.A WN.PR.E YPG.PR.B
Quote, 7/25 20.80-20 20.31-68 23.05-15
Quote, 8/14 20.35-65 19.86-00 22.50-84
Return (b/b) for period -2.16% -2.22% -2.39%
Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.75% 4.79% 26,199 15.96 1 -0.2051% 1,040.7
Fixed-Floater 5.01% 4.97% 123,815 15.66 8 +0.3194% 1,016.4
Floater 4.91% 2.79% 72,634 8.12 4 -0.3415% 1,042.5
Op. Retract 4.82% 4.05% 81,719 2.89 16 +0.0565% 1,025.1
Split-Share 5.07% 4.80% 99,791 3.89 15 -0.0933% 1,040.7
Interest Bearing 6.23% 6.69% 63,505 4.62 3 -0.4036% 1,035.1
Perpetual-Premium 5.55% 5.28% 99,989 7.19 24 -0.1837% 1,020.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.09% 5.13% 297,401 15.28 39 -0.1788% 974.4
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
SBN.PR.A SplitShare -1.4778% Asset coverage of nearly 2.3:1 as of August 9, according to Mulvihill, which seems more than adequate given that the underlying security is BNS common. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.26% based on a bid of 10.00 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-01 at 10.00.
BCE.PR.T FixFloat -1.4021%  
POW.PR.C PerpetualPremium -1.3807% Note that although the closing bid was 25.00, the low for the day was 25.30. So don’t panic just yet. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.86% based on a bid of 25.00 and a limitMaturity.
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing -1.3684% More oscillations! Asset coverage on August 10 was 1.84:1 according to Brookfield. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.32% (as interest, mostly) based on a bid of 9.37 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
RY.PR.A PerpetualDiscount -1.1926% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.99% based on a bid of 22.37 and a limitMaturity.
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat +1.9765%  
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
GWO.PR.F PerpetualPremium 78,282 Desjardins crossed 75,000 at 26.85. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.51% based on a bid of 26.85 and a call 2008-10-30 at 26.00. Somebody’s betting it won’t be called!
GWO.PR.H PerpetualDiscount 59,069 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.12% based on a bid of 23.95 and a limitMaturity.
IGM.PR.A OpRet 37,894 Scotia crossed 36,900 at 26.89. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.27% based on a bid of 26.80 and a call 2009-7-30 at 26.00.
BNS.PR.L PerpetualDiscount 19,200 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.94% based on a bid of 22.96 and a limitMaturity.
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 17,550 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.95% based on a bid of 22.92 and a limitMaturity.

There were six other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

HIMI Preferred Indices

HIMIPref™ Indices: August 31, 1999

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1999-08-31
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,549.4 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,619.8 8 2.00 5.14% 15.2 172M 5.13%
Floater 1,458.9 3 1.68 4.93% 15.4 44M 5.35%
OpRet 1,375.7 30 1.17 4.97% 3.1 65M 6.15%
SplitShare 1,414.4 4 1.50 5.49% 6.7 46M 5.43%
Interest-Bearing 1,458.6 4 2.00 7.61% 4.0 627M 7.98%
Perpetual-Premium 1,197.2 4 1.25 6.59% 0.2 56M 7.24%
Perpetual-Discount 1,254.1 10 1.60 5.72% 14.2 149M 5.67%

Index Constitution, 1999-08-31, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1999-08-31, Post-rebalancing

Issue Comments

DBRS: IQW.PR.C / IQW.PR.D Under Review Negative

DBRS has announced it has:

placed the BB long-term debt ratings and Pfd-4 preferred share rating of Quebecor World Inc. and its related subsidiaries (Quebecor World or the Company) Under Review with Negative Implications. The Under Review – Negative status reflects DBRS’s concerns over the Company’s near-term liquidity, outcome of negotiations regarding the Company’s bank agreements (the existing waiver for which expires at the end of Q3 2007) and the Company’s strategic review of its European operations – all factors that have been exacerbated by continued weakness in the Company’s operating results. DBRS expects to complete its review after the end of Q3 2007.

DBRS is concerned with Quebecor World’s near-term liquidity, which continues to be negatively impacted by declining EBITDA and cash flow from operations, pressuring existing financial covenants and significantly restricting the Company’s financial flexibility.

It hasn’t been too long since these issues were downgraded from Pfd-4(high) to Pfd-4.

S&P rates the issues P-5(high) as of Sept 28/06; Watch Negative as of August 9/07. When placing the issues on Watch Negative, S&P stated:

“The CreditWatch placement reflect Quebecor World’s ongoing weak performance and our concerns that the company’s earnings, credit measures, and financial flexibility could weaken further due to a challenging pricing environment, operating losses in its European division, and intense competition,” said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Lori Harris. “Furthermore, Quebecor World’s waivers from its bank group for certain financial covenants are only approved through to the release of its third-quarter 2007 financial results,”

HIMIPref™ maintains the Quebecor World preferreds in its database. These issues are recorded solely for the sake of continuity and have no influence on the calculation of yield curves.

Market Action

August 13, 2007

Link heaven today, since everybody’s talking about interesting stuff! You know things are getting weird when the words “Ruble” and “Safe Haven” are mentioned in the same sentence.

Things were going well until Coventree announced it wasn’t able to roll its commercial paper and was therefore extending the term of their extendible notes. As they explain in a very good promotional essay, written in 2002 and still on their website, Extendible Notes provide liquidity protection for issuers similar to that of having stand-by lines with major banks, while being much less costly to support. Whether or not anybody will be willing to buy these things after seeing all the damage an extension can do in practice, is something we will just have to wait and see.

After Coventree’s announcement, American and Canadian equities tanked, ruining what had been a pretty good day ’till that point. Equities had, until then, been able to laugh off a Goldman Sachs bail-out of one of their funds, to the tune of $3-billion.

The Global Equity fund has about $3.50 in borrowed money, or leverage, for each $1 of client money, down from $6 before the capital infusion announced today, Viniar said. The fund plans to keep leverage at the current level.

When you are levered 7:1, there isn’t much room for zig-zags in market prices! This, I think, is one of those occasions where patient money that isn’t marked to market every single day can find some good bargains. High-quality spread product has been suggested.

There was more central bank intervention on the day and some fast-money is betting that this will turn into rate cuts. I don’t buy that myself … but I can’t deny that the market is expecting cuts. Jim Hamilton wrote a great essay defining a liquidity event and attached a graph of Fed-Intervention-Sizes I can’t help reproducing here:

Wow! The WSJ posted a primer on the mechanics of this. My own homely example of a liquidity crunch is … say you have to sell me your house … maybe you’re moving or something. It’s worth $400,000 – we both agree on that. But I can’t get financing! All the bank is willing to lend me is $300,000! At that point, you might have to swallow hard and sell it to me for the latter figure … and I’ll have to keep my nose clean for the next while so the bank doesn’t foreclose on me.

The central banks are desperately afraid of this type of thing happening … it’s what happened in Japan in the late eighties, and we’ve seen how that story plays out. So they are lending the top-tier banks as much money as they want at the overnight rates, simply to ensure that these banks can then make business decisions based on expected returns relative to the overnight without having to worry about their own financing. With luck, this liquidity will trickle into the marketplace and – since everybody agrees your house is really worth $400,000 – I’ll be able to get financing for the original figure. I’ll have to, since if I don’t somebody else will. But a prolonged liquidity squeeze can lead to deflation – and fighting deflation is like trying to push a rope uphill.

There is money around, so we needn’t all panic just yet. J&J just came out with a massive bond issue that was sharply increased in size once they realized how much demand there was for triple-A product. There are warnings that the same reception won’t be found by lesser credits, however.

As one might imagine, government bonds had an entirely reasonably good day, with Treasuries up a tad and Canadas up a tad more.

In continuing stories, there is argument that sub-prime is NOT Greenspan’s fault and, having made their point, China backed off the financial Armageddon thing.

The preferred share market was quiet, drifting slightly downward on not much volume.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.74% 4.78% 27,263 15.97 1 -0.0820% 1,042.9
Fixed-Floater 5.03% 5.00% 125,521 15.60 8 -0.1064% 1,013.2
Floater 4.89% 0.08% 72,118 8.13 4 +0.0026% 1,046.1
Op. Retract 4.82% 4.06% 81,126 2.93 16 +0.1121% 1,024.5
Split-Share 5.07% 4.75% 100,383 3.72 15 -0.0314% 1,041.6
Interest Bearing 6.21% 6.62% 63,728 4.63 3 +0.2757% 1,039.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.54% 5.24% 100,421 5.80 24 -0.0592% 1,022.2
Perpetual-Discount 5.08% 5.12% 300,620 15.30 39 -0.0814% 976.1
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -1.1638%  
PIC.PR.A SplitShare -1.0918% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.94% based on a bid of 15.40 and a hardMaturity 2010-11-1 at 15.00.
CU.PR.A PerpetualPremium -1.0626% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.63% based on a bid of 25.14 and a call 2012-3-31 at $25.00.
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.0638% I don’t know about anybody else, but I’m getting awfully tired of seeing this issue in the “Major Price Move” list every single day! Can’t it just find a level? Asset coverage on August 10 was 1.84:1 according to Brookfield. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.08% (as interest, mostly) based on a bid of 9.50 and hardMaturity. 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
CM.PR.R OpRet +1.4041% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.85% based on a bid of 26.00 and a call 2008-5-30 at 25.75.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
DFN.PR.A SplitShare 70,568 Desjardins bought 29,700 from “Anonymous” at 10.30 just before the close – a total of 57,800 traded in the last ten minutes of the day, and another 300 in after-hours. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.81% based on a bid of 10.30 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-1 at 10.00.
RY.PR.W PerpetualDiscount 14,900 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.00% based on a bid of 24.56 and a limitMaturity.
SLF.PR.B PerpetualDiscount 13,500 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.01% based on a bid of 24.21 and a limitMaturity.
RY.PR.B PerpetualDiscount 12,545 RBC crossed 10,000 at 23.70. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.98% based on a bid of 23.65 and a limitMaturity.
ALB.PR.A SplitShare 11,800 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.25% based on a bid of 24.95 and a call 2008-3-29 at 25.00.

There were five other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

 

HIMI Preferred Indices

HIMIPref™ Indices: July 30, 1999

All indices were assigned a value of 1000.0 as of December 31, 1993.

HIMI Index Values 1999-07-30
Index Closing Value (Total Return) Issues Mean Credit Quality Median YTW Median DTW Median Daily Trading Mean Current Yield
Ratchet 1,540.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
FixedFloater 1,621.7 8 2.00 4.62% 15.7 248M 5.10%
Floater 1,450.7 3 1.69 4.95% 15.5 29M 5.35%
OpRet 1,382.6 31 1.16 4.78% 3.2 81M 6.13%
SplitShare 1,407.4 4 1.49 5.47% 6.8 46M 5.46%
Interest-Bearing 1,439.3 3 2.00 7.80% 11.5 899M 7.96%
Perpetual-Premium 1,200.6 4 1.25 5.37% 0.3 47M 7.18%
Perpetual-Discount 1,253.8 10 1.60 5.60% 14.4 196M 5.66%

Index Constitution, 1999-07-30, Pre-rebalancing

Index Constitution, 1999-07-30, Post-rebalancing