Index Construction / Reporting

Index Performance: June 2010

Performance of the HIMIPref™ Indices for June, 2010, was:

Total Return
Index Performance
June 2010
Three Months
to
June 30, 2010
Ratchet -1.41% -5.25%
FixFloat +1.88% -2.05%
Floater -0.44% -8.10%
OpRet +1.41% +1.09%
SplitShare +1.33% +1.90%
Interest +1.41%**** +1.09%****
PerpetualPremium +5.32%* +3.08%*
PerpetualDiscount +5.32% +4.14%
FixedReset +1.59% -0.34%
* The last member of the PerpetualPremium index was transferred to PerpetualDiscount at the May, 2010, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the PerpetualPremium index
**** The last member of the InterestBearing index was transferred to Scraps at the June, 2009, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the OperatingRetractible index
Passive Funds (see below for calculations)
CPD +2.58% +1.33%
DPS.UN +3.42% +1.09%
Index
BMO-CM 50 +2.87% +1.17%
TXPR Total Return +2.64% +1.40%

The pre-tax interest equivalent spread of PerpetualDiscounts over Long Corporates (which I also refer to as the Seniority Spread) ended the month at 290bp a significant decline from the +315bp recorded on May 31. The big story was the decline in long corporate yields, from 5.65% to 5.45%, as increased chatter about deflation has the market timers all excited.

I would be happier with long corporates in the 6.00-6.25% range, but what do I know? The market has never shown any particular interest in my happiness.

Charts related to the Seniority Spread and the Bozo Spread (PerpetualDiscount Current Yield less FixedReset Current Yield) are published in PrefLetter.

The trailing year returns are starting to look a bit more normal.


Click for big

Floaters have had a wild ride


Click for big

FixedReset volume declined during the month after their burst of activity in April when they performed poorly. Volume may be under-reported due to the influence of Alternative Trading Systems (as discussed in the November PrefLetter), but I am biding my time before incorporating ATS volumes into the calculations, to see if the effect is transient or not.


Click for big

Compositions of the passive funds were discussed in the September, 2009, edition of PrefLetter.

Claymore has published NAV and distribution data (problems with the page in IE8 can be kludged by using compatibility view) for its exchange traded fund (CPD) and I have derived the following table:

CPD Return, 1- & 3-month, to June, 2010
Date NAV Distribution Return for Sub-Period Monthly Return
March 31, 2010 16.46 0.00    
April 30 16.11     -2.13%
May 31 16.26     +0.93%
June 25 16.47 0.21 +2.58% +2.58%
June 30, 2010 16.47 0.00 0.00%
Quarterly Return +1.33%

Claymore currently holds $444,847,391 (advisor & common combined) in CPD assets, up about $13-million from the $431,929,434 reported last month and up about $71-million from the $373,729,364 reported at year-end. The monthly increase in AUM of about 2.99% is larger than the total return of +2.58%, implying that the ETF experienced small net subscriptions in May.

The DPS.UN NAV for June 30 has been published so we may calculate the approximate May returns.

DPS.UN NAV Return, June-ish 2010
Date NAV Distribution Return for sub-period Return for period
Estimated May Ending Stub -0.74% **
May 26, 2010 19.34      
June 28 19.85 * 0.30   +4.19%
June 30, 2010 19.85     0.00%
Estimated June Return +3.42% ***
*CPD had a NAVPU of 16.47 on June 28 and 16.47 on June 30, hence the total return for the period for CPD was +0.00%. The return for DPS.UN in this period is presumed to be equal, hence the estimated NAV for DPS.UN on June 28 is presumed to be equal to the June 30 value.
**CPD had a NAVPU of 16.14 on May 26 and 16.26 on May 31, hence the total return for the period for CPD was +0.74%. The return for DPS.UN in this period is presumed to be equal.
*** The estimated June return for DPS.UN’s NAV is therefore the product of three period returns, -0.74%, +4.19% and 0.00% to arrive at an estimate for the calendar month of +3.42%

Now, to see the DPS.UN quarterly NAV approximate return, we refer to the calculations for April and May:

DPS.UN NAV Returns, three-month-ish to end-June-ish, 2010
April-ish -2.47%
May-ish +0.22%
June-ish +3.42%
Three-months-ish +1.09%
Index Construction / Reporting

HIMIPref™ Index Rebalancing: June, 2010

HIMI Index Changes, June 30, 2010
Issue From To Because
BAM.PR.G FixFloat Scraps Volume
PWF.PR.A Scraps Floater Volume
CL.PR.B PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price
NA.PR.M PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price
CU.PR.B PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price
BMO.PR.L PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price

The strong performance of Straight Perpetuals over the past month means that the PerpetualPremium index has been repopulated, albeit lightly and weakly. Unfortunately, however, low volumes on BAM.PR.G have resulted in its relegation to the Scraps index, leaving FixedFloaters as an empty set.

There were the following intra-month changes:

HIMI Index Changes during June 2010
Issue Action Index Because
EMA.PR.A Add Scraps New Issue
TRP.PR.C Add FixedReset New Issue
PWF.PR.P Add FixedReset New Issue
Issue Comments

Best & Worst Performers: June 2010

These are total returns, with dividends presumed to have been reinvested at the bid price on the ex-date. The list has been restricted to issues in the HIMIPref™ indices.

June 2010
Issue Index DBRS Rating Monthly Performance Notes (“Now” means “June 30”)
BAM.PR.K Floater Pfd-2(low) -3.41% Also the worst performer in May.
BAM.PR.B Floater Pfd-2(low) -2.56% Also the second-worst performer in May.
GWO.PR.J FixedReset Pfd-1(low) -2.37% It’s presence here is largely due to a disappearing bid on June 30: the closing quote was 25.92-62, after trading 3,400 shares in a range of 26.62-85. Now with a (bid) yield of 4.90% based on a bid of 25.92 an a call 2014-1-30 at 25.00.
BAM.PR.E Ratchet Pfd-2(low) -1.41% Strong Pair with BAM.PR.G. Also the fourth-worst performer in May.
BNA.PR.D SplitShare Pfd-2(low) -0.19% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.35% based on a bid of 25.95 and a hardMaturity 2014-7-9 at 25.00.
W.PR.J Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(low) +8.01% Now with a pre-tax bid-TTW of 6.10% based on a bid of 23.00 and a limitMaturity.
W.PR.H Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(low) +8.05% Now with a pre-tax bid-TTW of 6.11% based on a bid of 22.53 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.M Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(low) +8.26% Now with a pre-tax bid-TTW of 6.59% based on a bid of 18.16 and a limitMaturity.
IAG.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(high) +8.72% The fifth-worst performer in May, so a lot of this return is merely bounce-back. Now with a pre-tax bid-TTW of 6.03% based on a bid of 19.20 and a limitMaturity.
ELF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(low) +9.10% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.62% based on a bid of 18.03 and a limitMaturity.
Market Action

June 30, 2010

Corporations are well placed to weather the next crisis:

Companies from the U.S. to Europe and Asia are selling the fewest bonds since 2004, as rising cash levels allow borrowers to weather a slowing economy.

Debt offerings fell to $1.17 trillion in the first half of the year, 39 percent less than the same period in 2009, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The decline was led by financial companies, which issued 35 percent less debt.

Issuance is declining as borrowers with 15 percent more cash than a year earlier avoid tapping credit markets amid concern that Europe’s sovereign-debt crisis may slow the global economic recovery. Corporate bonds have returned 4.9 percent in the first half of the year, beating the MSCI World Index of stocks, which is down 8.9 percent, by the most in nine years.

Cash at investment-grade companies rose to $668 billion at the end of the first quarter from $580 billion a year earlier, while debt fell 2 percent to $2.3 trillion, JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts led by Eric Beinstein in New York wrote last week.

In the midst of the sovereign debt crisis, the EU is taking firm action:

Bankers in Europe will not be allowed to take home more than a third of their bonuses in cash from the start of next year under planned new rules, a British lawmaker said Tuesday.

Under the negotiated agreement, cash could only constitute 30 percent of a regular bonus and one-fifth a large bonus. A new watchdog for European banks will define what constitutes a large bonus. There will also be an opportunity for a “clawback” of bonuses if deals made to reach profit targets later fell apart.

In addition, banks that have received government bailouts will have to limit bonuses paid to their managers, while directors will not be eligible to receive any bonus unless it is justified to supervisors. Banks must also set limits on bonuses in relation to salaries to avoid any windfall payouts.

What will happen, I think, is that talent will migrate to hedge funds, which will take over a significant part of the market-making function. Maybe this is a good thing. But I doubt that anybody’s thought about it.

Ms Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, spoke at the US Financial Services Roundtable, Brussels, 28 June 2010, stringing together non-sequiters to reach a politically desirable conclusion (emphasis added):

The first priority relates to the development of financial infrastructures in those markets where they are not yet sufficiently used or available, notably in OTC derivatives markets. The crisis has shown that markets with adequate infrastructures and hence proper risk management and risk provisions have proven to be more resilient than markets without such infrastructures, such as the OTC derivatives markets. Therefore, expanding the use of central counterparties (CCPs) in these increasingly systemically relevant markets is a key measure to reduce counterparty and operational risk. Another important step is the mandatory reporting of all trades to centralised trade registries, so-called trade repositories, in order to enhance market transparency. In my view, if CCPs and trade repositories for credit default swaps had been available before the Lehman default, Lehman’s CDS exposures could have been managed in a much more transparent and resilient way and could have mitigated the negative chain reaction on CDS markets that followed the demise of Lehman.

CCPs and trade repositories for OTC derivatives are ultimately beneficial for all stakeholders. Still, there are the well-known challenges of effective collective action in the context of the provision of public goods. Hence, private sector efforts alone may not suffice to foster sufficient progress towards the use of CCPs and trade repositories for OTC derivatives. It is therefore important to adopt and implement the regulatory requirements for the mandatory central clearing of all eligible products and the reporting of trades to trade repositories in a timely manner. Given, however, the global nature of OTC derivatives markets, it is clear that such regulatory tools will only be successful if they are applied in a coordinated manner around the globe. I strongly support the recently launched work of the Financial Stability Board to develop common approaches to fostering the central clearing of eligible OTC derivatives as well as to expand the range of potentially clearable products through enhanced standardisation.

Quite frankly, I don’t understand her use of the word “therefore”!

The OSC has published a new edition of Perspectives. Articles feature:

  • CSA publishes proposed amendments to mutual fund regulations
  • CSA publishes frequently asked questions about order protection and locked and crossed markets
  • OSC updates registrant section of its website

There’s some more reaction to mandatory margining proposals, this time from ISDA:

A change in the wording of the financial reform bill now being finalized in the US Congress could cost US companies as much as $1 trillion in capital and liquidity requirements, according to research by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA). About $400 billion would be needed as collateral that corporations could be required to post with their dealer counterparties to cover the current exposure of their OTC derivatives transactions. ISDA estimates that $370 billion represents the additional credit capacity that companies could need to maintain to cover potential future exposure of those transactions. If markets return to levels prevailing at the end of 2008, additional collateral needs would bring the total to $1 trillion.

That will be a nice little profit centre for the banks – setting up credit lines dedicated to collateralization! Now, is this a good thing, or a bad thing? Nobody knows. It hasn’t been discussed.

Naturally, some companies will be affected more than others:

Berkshire [Hathaway Inc.] owns derivatives with a notional value of about $62 billion and has “negligible” collateral requirements, Barclays analyst Jay Gelb said today in a report. [Warren] Buffett’s firm, based in Omaha, Nebraska, may need to post $6 billion to $8 billion in collateral under rules being debated by the U.S. Congress, he said.

The SEC has announced new rules to discourage political corruption in the investment advisory business. Sadly, there are no rules disallowing the hiring of former SEC employees.

CM has issued CHF 500-million in 5-year covered bonds at 1.75%. Bonds OnLine is reporting 5-year Swiss governments at a rather alarming -0.26% (that’s right, negative twenty-six beeps); the only data I can find for 5-years on the Swiss National Bank site is dated May 31. DBRS rates them AAA:

The ratings are based on several factors. First, the Covered Bonds are senior unsecured direct obligations of CIBC, which is the fifth largest bank in Canada and rated AA and R-1 (high) with a Stable trend by DBRS. Second, in addition to a general recourse to CIBC’s assets, the Covered Bonds are supported by a diversified collateral pool of first-lien prime residential mortgages insured by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) (the Cover Pool). CMHC is an agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada and is rated AAA by DBRS.

MFC.PR.B traded 5,792 shares on the TSX today in a range of 19.63-80 and closed at 19.01-66, 10×12. The last trade was at 3:58pm, 300 shares at 19.66. I can only suppose the market maker decided to get an early start on his weekend.

Much the same thing happened with GWO.PR.J: traded 3,400 shares in a range of 26.62-85 before closing at 25.92-62, 20×7.

BAM.PR.G traded 145 shares, all at 21.40, and closed at 20.91-40, 15×10. I can only imagine that the market maker was overwhelmed by the volume.

These are particularly annoying incidents, because it’s not just month-end, it’s quarter-end.

PerpetualDiscounts squeaked out a win today, gaining 4bp, while FixedResets gained 7bp on light volume and, as we have seen, a surprising and probably spurious amount of volatility.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.97%, equivalent to 8.36% interest at the standard conversion factor of 1.4x. Long corporates now yield an astonishing (to me) 5.45%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (also called the Seniority Spread) now stands at about 290bp, the same level reported on June 23, but a narrowing of 25bp from the 315bp spread reported on May 31.

And that’s a wrap for June, 2010!

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 2.81 % 2.92 % 27,881 20.35 1 0.0000 % 2,048.0
FixedFloater 5.20 % 3.37 % 21,210 19.70 1 -2.2897 % 3,077.5
Floater 2.42 % 2.85 % 76,191 20.08 3 -0.2578 % 2,239.0
OpRet 4.87 % 3.57 % 82,897 0.89 11 -0.0423 % 2,335.9
SplitShare 6.37 % 6.35 % 91,524 3.47 2 -0.0439 % 2,178.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0423 % 2,136.0
Perpetual-Premium 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0431 % 1,916.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.94 % 5.97 % 192,482 13.90 77 0.0431 % 1,814.0
FixedReset 5.37 % 3.90 % 335,785 3.46 47 0.0686 % 2,189.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
MFC.PR.B Perpetual-Discount -2.96 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 19.01
Evaluated at bid price : 19.01
Bid-YTW : 6.17 %
GWO.PR.J FixedReset -2.63 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.92
Bid-YTW : 4.90 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater -2.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.91
Bid-YTW : 3.37 %
BAM.PR.B Floater -1.80 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 15.30
Evaluated at bid price : 15.30
Bid-YTW : 2.85 %
PWF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.77
Bid-YTW : 6.13 %
TD.PR.N OpRet -1.26 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.77
Bid-YTW : 3.92 %
BAM.PR.K Floater -1.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 15.26
Evaluated at bid price : 15.26
Bid-YTW : 2.86 %
TD.PR.G FixedReset 1.13 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.75
Bid-YTW : 3.56 %
BAM.PR.H OpRet 1.21 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.92
Bid-YTW : -13.77 %
TRI.PR.B Floater 1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 23.32
Evaluated at bid price : 23.60
Bid-YTW : 1.82 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 376,889 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 23.10
Evaluated at bid price : 24.93
Bid-YTW : 4.03 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset 159,850 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 23.16
Evaluated at bid price : 25.11
Bid-YTW : 4.04 %
PWF.PR.J OpRet 121,223 Called for redemption.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.71
Bid-YTW : 3.51 %
PWF.PR.I Perpetual-Discount 82,900 RBC crossed blocks of 10,000 and 57,300, both at 24.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 24.42
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 6.15 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset 78,929 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 24.56.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 24.55
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %
BNS.PR.M Perpetual-Discount 27,091 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-30
Maturity Price : 19.80
Evaluated at bid price : 19.80
Bid-YTW : 5.79 %
There were 22 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Market Action

June 29, 2010

The Bank for International Settlements released its annual report with chapters on:

  • Beyond the rescue: exiting intensive care and finishing the reforms
  • From the emergency room to intensive care: the year in retrospect
  • Low interest rates: do the risks outweigh the rewards?
  • Post-crisis policy challenges in emerging market economies
  • Fiscal sustainability in the industrial countries: risks and challenges
  • The future of the financial sector
  • Macroprudential policy and addressing procyclicality
  • The BIS: mission, activities, governance and financial results

Naturally enough, the sections that dealt with regulation are in complete alignment with the G-20 communique. What a coincidence that is!

There’s a hiccup on the way to the US Bank Bill:

U.S. Representative Barney Frank may reconvene the House-Senate financial-overhaul conference today to address Republican protests over a $19 billion bank fee in the bill, according to a scheduling announcement sent to lawmakers.

One plan under consideration would instead cover the shortfall in the bill with an increase in the fund that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. maintains to repay customers their deposits when a bank fails. Another would save money by closing the Troubled Asset Relief Program two months early, according to the announcement.

Changing the bank fee could end an impasse that threatened to delay the final Senate vote on the bill after the death of Senator Robert Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat. Byrd’s absence left Democrats in need of all four Republicans who previously backed the measure. One of those Republicans, Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts, withdrew his support earlier today, citing the fee.

PrefBlog has added to its list of interesting things to do while drunk:

Mr Perkins, who worked for City brokers PVM Oil, had gone on a golfing weekend organised by the company.

Then he took the Monday off work and continued to binge drink from midday onwards.

By the evening, Mr Perkins had made his first batch of unauthorised trades.

In his stupor, he casually notched up thousands of trades worth a total of $520million (£345million).

He drunkenly bought a net 7.13million barrels of oil during the typically quiet overnight period, and at times was personally responsible for 69 per cent of the overall volume of Brent crude being traded globally.

His actions sent prices surging by more than $1.50 to $73.50 for a barrel of Brent crude oil – the highest it had been for eight months.

The deals ended up costing his company £6million and potentially cost companies worldwide more than £100million.

Westcoast did a 10-year bond issue:

Westcoast Energy Inc. raised C$250 million from an issue of 10-year bonds maturing July 2020, pricing the offering at 138.5 basis points over the relevant benchmark for a yield of 4.571%, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The bonds carry a coupon of 4.57%.

Westcoast is owned by Spectra Energy Corp. (SE).

There’s an odd lawsuit against the Greater Toronto Hockey League claiming not that try-outs were rigged, or anything like that, but that everybody should get a chance to play (70-odd players tried out for 17 positions):

“Their direct actions have caused irreparable psychological damage to Daniel Longo’s self esteem as an impressionable teenager and demoralized Daniel as an athlete and team hockey player with his peers,” the Longo statement of claim reads. “The conduct by all defendants destroyed the dignity of my son, whom in good conscience gave his team nothing but his best efforts.”

Valela’s statement of claim states: “When Christopher was advised of his termination by my wife and I, he vowed never to play the game he loved since childhood. And, morevoer, his misguided group of defendants demoralized my wife and I, whom had gone well beyond the call of duty as parents in support of the Toronto Avalanche hockey team for two seasons.”

I know a teenager who quit an activity after finding out he wasn’t good enough. Has it always been this way, or is all the fashionable self-esteem crap raising a nation of quitters?

Tragedy struck the Canadian preferred share market today, as PerpetualDiscounts suffered their first loss since May 20. The PerpetualDiscount index gained on twenty-six consecutive trading days, for a total return of +7.43% as median weighted average yield declined from 6.39% to 6.01%. Over the same period, FixedResets had a total return of +1.68%.

I had been hoping to close the quarter with a full month’s run of gains … but you can’t win them all!

PerpetualDiscounts lost 4bp while FixedResets gained 11bp today. Volume picked up to above-average levels, perhaps related to portfolio shuffling with respect to PWF.PR.P and TRP.PR.C, which both closed today.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 2.81 % 2.91 % 29,040 20.36 1 0.0000 % 2,048.0
FixedFloater 5.08 % 3.25 % 21,966 19.86 1 -0.0467 % 3,149.6
Floater 2.42 % 2.80 % 75,818 20.22 3 -0.6041 % 2,244.8
OpRet 4.87 % 3.31 % 86,299 0.41 11 0.1166 % 2,336.9
SplitShare 6.36 % 6.27 % 87,069 3.47 2 -0.5455 % 2,179.7
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1166 % 2,136.9
Perpetual-Premium 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0402 % 1,915.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.94 % 6.00 % 194,603 13.91 77 -0.0402 % 1,813.2
FixedReset 5.37 % 3.93 % 340,948 3.52 47 0.1140 % 2,187.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
NA.PR.L Perpetual-Discount -1.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 20.55
Evaluated at bid price : 20.55
Bid-YTW : 6.00 %
CM.PR.J Perpetual-Discount -1.16 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 18.79
Evaluated at bid price : 18.79
Bid-YTW : 5.99 %
BNA.PR.C SplitShare -1.06 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2019-01-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 19.56
Bid-YTW : 8.00 %
PWF.PR.G Perpetual-Discount 1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 24.32
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 6.10 %
PWF.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 21.79
Evaluated at bid price : 22.05
Bid-YTW : 6.05 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet 1.84 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.97
Bid-YTW : 3.64 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 567,818 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 23.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.83
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %
PWF.PR.P FixedReset 563,942 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 23.12
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
BNS.PR.N Perpetual-Discount 411,715 Nesbitt crossed 400,000 at 22.85.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 22.72
Evaluated at bid price : 22.87
Bid-YTW : 5.84 %
TD.PR.C FixedReset 160,065 Scotia crossed 77,000 at 26.70; TD crossed blocks of 20,000 and 25,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-02
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.69
Bid-YTW : 3.90 %
TD.PR.G FixedReset 70,200 TD crossed blocks of 25,000 and 10,000 at 27.40; National sold 10,000 to anonymous at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.44
Bid-YTW : 3.89 %
PWF.PR.J OpRet 60,633 Called for redemption.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-07-29
Maturity Price : 25.50
Evaluated at bid price : 25.72
Bid-YTW : 3.31 %
There were 43 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Issue Comments

PWF.PR.P Closes Firm on Heavy Volume

Power Financial Corp. has announced:

the successful completion and closing of an offering of 11,200,000 4.40% Non-Cumulative 5-Year Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series P (the “Series P Shares”) priced at $25.00 per share to raise gross proceeds of $280 million.

The issue was bought by an underwriting group co-led by BMO Capital Markets, RBC Capital Markets and Scotia Capital Inc. Following the successful sale of the initially announced 8,000,000 Series P Shares, the underwriters exercised an option to purchase an additional 3,200,000 Series P Shares.

The Series P Shares will be listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “PWF.PR.P”. Proceeds from the issue will be used to supplement Power Financial’s financial resources and for general corporate purposes.

PWF.PR.P is a FixedReset, 4.40%+160, announced June 17. It traded 563,942 shares today in a range of 24.85-02 before closing at 25.00-14.

The greenshoe was for 4-million shares, so 80% was exercised.

Given the Power Group’s reputation for extremely tight pricing of their new preferred issues, I can bet the CFO has already received a sternly worded memo about leaving too much money on the table!

Vital statistics are:

PWF.PR.P FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 23.12
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %

PWF.PR.P is tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been assigned to the FixedReset index.

Issue Comments

TRP.PR.C Closes Below Par on Heavy Volume

TransCanada Corp. has announced:

that it has completed its public offering of cumulative redeemable first preferred shares, series 5 (the “Series 5 Preferred Shares”). As the underwriters fully exercised their option to acquire an additional two million Series 5 Preferred Shares, the size of the offering increased to a total of 14 million shares resulting in gross proceeds of $350 million.

The offering was first announced on June 17, 2010 when TransCanada entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters in Canada led by Scotia Capital Inc., RBC Capital Markets, and BMO Capital Markets.

The net proceeds of the offering will be used to partially fund capital projects, for general corporate purposes and to reduce short term indebtedness of TransCanada and its affiliates, which short term indebtedness was used to fund TransCanada’s capital program and for general corporate purposes.

TRP.PR.C traded 567,818 shares today in a range of 24.75-90 before closing at 24.83-88. This issue is a FixedReset, 4.40%+154, announced June 17.

Vital statistics are:

TRP.PR.C FixedReset YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-29
Maturity Price : 23.07
Evaluated at bid price : 24.83
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %

TRP.PR.C is tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been added to the FixedReset index.

Market Action

June 28, 2010

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has released a Public Policy Brief by Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Giovanni P. Olivei titled The Role of Expectations and Output in the Inflation Process: An Empirical Assessment:

This brief examines two issues of current interest concerning inflation: (1) whether “well-anchored” expectations will help to restrain inflation’s decline and whether an “un-anchoring” of expectations could lead to undesirably high inflation and (2) to what extent output (or utilization) gaps are useful components of empirical models of inflation and, if they are useful, to what extent current gaps might counterbalance the effect of expectations on inflation. The goals of conducting this examination are to articulate a reasonably coherent framework for the discussion, highlight the key areas of uncertainty, and provide new empirical evidence that sheds some light on these areas.

Nothing much happened in the credit markets, so I’ll discuss Toronto politics. Why not?

I am pleased to see that Queers Against Israeli Apartheid is being readmitted to the Pride Parade:

Pride Toronto has announced that its recent resolution to restrict the use of certain language during the 2010 Parade has been replaced by the requirement that each participating group read, sign and agree to abide by the City of Toronto’s Declaration of a Non-Discrimination Policy, and that all groups that uphold this policy are welcome to participate in the 2010 Pride Parade.

The requirement to “read, sign and agree to abide by the City of Toronto’s Declaration of a Non-Discrimination Policy” is more than just a little bit precious, but if Pride wants to jump through those hoops, that’s their business. To me, it just shows there’s not much point in getting involved with any sponsored civic activity.

Two mayoral hopefuls seem to think this is an issue in which the city should be involved:

“I want to express my disappointment and disgust with Pride Toronto’s decision to allow this hateful group to march,” said mayoral hopeful Rob Ford.

Giorgio Mammoliti, who is also running for mayor, will introduce a motion at council demanding that Pride return all city funding, about $250,000.

Pride’s done a lot more to bring money into the city than either of those two clowns ever have! I think they should concentrate a little more on how to get a souvlaki cart licensed in less than three years.

PerpetualDiscounts gained 14bp today to keep the streak alive – two more days and they will have gone the entire month of June without a loss. FixedResets were flat; volume was moderate; volatility was almost non-existent.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 2.80 % 2.91 % 30,248 20.37 1 -2.3621 % 2,048.0
FixedFloater 5.08 % 3.25 % 21,722 19.87 1 0.5164 % 3,151.1
Floater 2.40 % 2.80 % 77,029 20.22 3 -0.0914 % 2,258.4
OpRet 4.87 % 3.49 % 86,042 0.42 11 -0.2502 % 2,334.2
SplitShare 6.33 % 6.22 % 88,425 3.47 2 -0.2829 % 2,191.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.2502 % 2,134.4
Perpetual-Premium 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1369 % 1,916.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.93 % 6.01 % 194,811 13.93 77 0.1369 % 1,813.9
FixedReset 5.42 % 3.97 % 318,296 3.46 45 -0.0050 % 2,185.3
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.E Ratchet -2.36 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-28
Maturity Price : 21.67
Evaluated at bid price : 20.75
Bid-YTW : 2.91 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet -2.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 4.30 %
GWO.PR.J FixedReset -1.22 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.62
Bid-YTW : 4.06 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TD.PR.O Perpetual-Discount 44,405 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 10,500 and 16,500, both at 21.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-28
Maturity Price : 21.24
Evaluated at bid price : 21.24
Bid-YTW : 5.82 %
TD.PR.K FixedReset 31,754 RBC crossed 24,800 at 27.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.45
Bid-YTW : 3.98 %
RY.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 29,747 RBC crossed 15,000 at 19.68.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-28
Maturity Price : 19.68
Evaluated at bid price : 19.68
Bid-YTW : 5.73 %
POW.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 28,800 RBC crossed 28,800 (yes, every share that traded) at 23.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-06-28
Maturity Price : 22.69
Evaluated at bid price : 22.93
Bid-YTW : 6.12 %
TD.PR.M OpRet 26,336 RBC crossed 20,000 at 26.31.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2010-07-28
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 25.99
Bid-YTW : 2.18 %
RY.PR.X FixedReset 21,760 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-23
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.35
Bid-YTW : 4.03 %
There were 25 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Issue Comments

FIG.PR.A: Warrant Exercise Minimal

Faircourt Asset Management has announced:

that approximately 1 million Warrants outstanding have been exercised at an exercise price of $4.00 per Trust Unit for aggregate gross proceeds raised approximating $4 million. Warrants not exercised expired on June 25th, 2010.

There were 4.9-million outstanding, so take-up was just a little over 20%.

FIG.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when the mass retraction of 6.4-million units was announced.

FIG.PR.A is tracked by HIMIPref™, but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

Issue Comments

PWF.PR.J to be Redeemed

Power Financial Corporation has announced:

that it intends to redeem all $150 million of its outstanding 4.70% Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares, Series J on July 30, 2010.

In accordance with the terms of the Series J Shares, the redemption price will be $25.50 for each Series J share plus an amount equal to all declared and unpaid dividends, net of any tax required to be withheld by the Corporation.

A notice of the redemption of the Series J Shares will be provided in accordance with the rights, privileges and conditions attached to the Series J Shares.

PWF.PR.J commenced trading in March, 2003, and was scheduled to become callable at par commencing 2012-4-30. It was last mentioned on PrefBlog in early 2007, after GWO bought Putnam.

PWF.PR.J is a member of the rapidly shrinking Operating Retractible index and closed last night at 25.80-85, with a negative Yield-to-Worst.