PrefBlog

Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund’s Net Asset Value per Unit as of the close December 29, 2023, was $8.4715 after a dividend distribution on $0.126972.

Performance was affected by TD.PF.C underperforming with a -1.86% return [after last month’s outperformance], PWF.PR.P with a -0.98% return [after last month’s outperformance] and FTS.PR.M with a -0.40% return [repeating last month’s underperformance]. This was mitigated by good performance from MIC.PR.A (+6.40%, following two months of underperformance), BN.PR.R (+5.34%, adding to last month’s outperformance) and CU.PR.C (+3.74%, following last month’s underperformance [small holdings are not considered for individual mention here]. There was more reversion than usual this month!

I feel it is only a matter of time before investors start paying attention to the fundamental risk of these instruments compared to their eye-popping interest-equivalent yields … but as always the best policy is to shut up and clip your coupons. The market continues to give considerable weight to Current Yield as a measure of valuation, ignoring or strongly deprecating the potential for large dividend increases on the next few years of resets.

FixedResets continue to yield more, in general, than PerpetualDiscounts; on December 29, I reported median YTWs of 7.65% and 6.86%, respectively, for these two indices; compare with mean Current Yields of 5.83% and 6.71%, respectively. RY.PR.J, to take a representative example, is calculated by HIMIPref™ as having a yield-to-worst of 7.62% at monthend (Current Yield of 4.22%); bid at 18.94, resetting 2025-5-24 at a spread of 274bp over GOC-5 (assumed to be constant at 3.21%) and currently paying 0.80 p.a. (3.20% annually). The next pay-date is 2024-2-24; it is trading cum-dividend.

If we plug the above data into the yield calculator for resets (which is discussed here and has recently been slightly modified), we arrive at a annualized (compounded semi-annually) yield of 7.55% for RY.PR.J . To take this 7bp (the difference between the spreadsheets and HIMIPref™) above the PerpetualDiscount median index yield of 6.86% (to account for the calculation methodological differences), which is to say 6.93%, requires the assumption that GOC-5 will be 2.68% forever, as opposed the ‘constant rate’ assumption of 3.21%. Well … pays yer money and takes yer chances, gents! Assiduous Readers with long memories will liken this to all the calculations of Break-even Rate Shock when the puzzle represented the same problem with a different sign! Note that even if the unfavourable scenario of GOC-5 = 2.68% is realized, this has only reduced the yield of RY.PR.J to that of the median adjusted PerpetualDiscount yield of 6.93%, which isn’t the worst outcome one might fear from one’s investments!

The five-year Canada yield declined, with the five-year Canada yield (“GOC-5”) falling from 3.82% at November month-end to 3.31% at December month-end.

The Seniority Spread (between long-term corporate bonds and interest-equivalent PerpetualDiscounts) was 430bp as of 2023-12-27 (chart end-date 2023-12-08) :

The situation with FixedResets is interesting, with the spread between GOC-5 and the interest-adjusted FixedReset (Discount) rate widening significantly from its 2021-11-10 low of 344bp to a level of 692bp (as of 2023-12-27) … (chart end-date 2023-12-08):

…while at the same time the interest-equivalent spread between FixedReset (Discounts) and PerpetualDiscounts has narrowed to -105bp (as of 2023-12-27) from its 2021-7-28 level of +170bp (chart end-date 2023-12-8):

There is no significant correlation between the Issue Reset Spread and 1-month performance for discounted FixedResets for either the Pfd-2 or Pfd-3 Group issues.

There is no significant correlation between the Issue Reset Spread and 1-month performance for discounted FixedResets for either the Pfd-2 or Pfd-3 Group issues.

There was a correlation for the Pfd-2 Group (11%) but none for the Pfd-3 Group for 1-Month performance against term-to-reset:

… and the same for three-month returns vs. Term to Reset (correlation for Pfd-2 was 19%):

It should be noted that to some extent such a dependence (of performance on term-to-reset) can be justified as the nearer-term issues will receive the benefit of higher projected dividend rates sooner as a result of higher GOC-5 yields and therefore, perhaps, for longer. Equations for the relationship between correlation slope and change in GOC-5 were derived in the August 2022 PrefLetter. In the three months from August 31 to November 30, the GOC-5 rate declined from 4.08% to 3.82%, but this is a small move by recent standards. The smaller correlations may indicate a regime shift from recognition of a rise to expectation of declines in five-year yields, but at present the situation is chaotic.

Upwards-sloping correlations of Performance vs. Term are to be expected when GOC-5 declines.

I keep talking about ‘Sustainable Income’ and nowadays it’s far higher than the dividends that are currently being distributed. This is because Sustainable Income is the average yield-to-worst (YTW) of the portfolio when the YTW is calculated to perpetuity (or to redemption, of course, if the yield to redemption is lower), including resets at the current GOC-5 rate. The sharp increase in GOC-5 in the past year-odd has caused the difference between YTW and Current Yield to skyrocket, but one way or another I expect that these two values will become much closer – slowly at first, but quickening in about two years. We have to wait for the reset date of the MAPF portfolio securities before we see a change in actual cash receipts – and, of course, there is no guarantee whatsoever that the rate used for estimation purposes now will be used for the actual calculation in the future (chart prepared as of 2023-12-8).

I will note that the fund’s current holdings of FixedResets are now paying dividends based on their previous reset at an average GOC-5 rate of 1.29% (weighted by shares held). While nobody knows what the future might bring, I suggest that we won’t see GOC-5 return to that level again for a while!

These calculations were performed assuming constant contemporary GOC-5 and 3-Month Bill rates, as follows:

Turnover remained high at 18% in December, made possible by what seemed to be tax-loss selling.

Sectoral distribution of the MAPF portfolio on December 29, 2023, were:

The “total” reflects the un-leveraged total portfolio (i.e., cash is included in the portfolio calculations and is deemed to have a duration and yield of 0.00.). MAPF will often have relatively large cash balances, both credit and debit, to facilitate trading. Figures presented in the table have been rounded to the indicated precision.

Credit distribution is:

Liquidity Distribution is:

The distribution of Issue Reset Spreads is:

Distribution of Floating Rate Start Dates is shown in the table below. This is the date of the next adjustment to the dividend rate, if the issue is currently paying a fixed rate for a limited time; which in practice is successive terms of 5 years. Issues that adjust quarterly are considered “Currently Floating”.

MAPF is, of course, Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, a “unit trust” managed by Hymas Investment Management Inc. Further information and links to performance, audited financials and subscription information are available the fund’s web page. The fund may be purchased directly from Hymas Investment Management. A “unit trust” is like a regular mutual fund, but are not sold with a prospectus This is cheaper, but means subscription is restricted to “accredited investors” (as defined by the Ontario Securities Commission). Fund past performances are not a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in MAPF or any other fund.