NA Tier 1 Capital : October 2007

National Bank has released its Fourth Quarter, 2007, Report and Supplementary Information; I will analyze this in the same format as was has been recently done for BMO and TD.

Step One is to analyze their Tier 1 Capital, reproducing the summary produced last year (although NA was not included in last year’s round-up):

NA Capital Structure
October, 2007
& October 2006
  2007 2006
Total Tier 1 Capital 4,442 4,674
Common Shareholders’ Equity 95.0% 93.8%
Preferred Shares 9.0% 8.6%
Innovative Tier 1 Capital Instruments 11.4% 12.0%
Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries 0.4% 0.2%
Goodwill -15.8% -14.6%

Next, the issuance capacity (from Part 3 of last year’s series):

NA
Tier 1 Issuance Capacity
October 2007
& October 2006
  2007 2006
Equity Capital (A) 3,534 3,712
Non-Equity Tier 1 Limit (B=A/3) 1,178 1,237
Innovative Tier 1 Capital (C) 508 562
Preferred Limit (D=B-C) 670 675
Preferred Y/E Actual (E) 400 400
Post Y/E Issuance (F) 0 0
New Issuance Capacity (G=D-E-F) 270 275
Items A, C & E are taken from the table
“Risk-Adjusted Capital Ratios”
of the supplementary information;
Note that Item A includes Goodwill, non-controlling interest
and trading positions (SEE UPDATE, BELOW)
Item B is as per OSFI Guidelines
Items D, F & G are my calculations

We can now show the all important Risk-Weighted Asset Ratios!

NA
Risk-Weighted Asset Ratios
October 2007
& October 2007
  Note 2007 2006
Equity Capital A 3,534 3,712
Risk-Weighted Assets B 49,336 47,298
Equity/RWA C=A/B 7.16% 7.85%
Tier 1 Ratio D 9.0% 9.9%
Capital Ratio E 12.4% 14.0%
A is taken from the table “Issuance Capacity”, above
B, D & E are taken from the Supplementary Report
C is my calculation.

Note that, as with BMO and TD, the Equity/RWA ratio and Tier 1 Ratio have both deteriorated over the year, but for NA the Total Capital Ratio has also declined. Subordinated Debt outstanding has declined over the past year.

It is disappointing to see the deterioration in the Equity/RWA ratio over the year – I consider this to be a measure of the safety of the preferred shares, as it is the “total risk” of the bank’s assets (as defined by the regulators) divided by the value of capital junior to preferreds (which therefore takes the first loss). It is by no means anything to lose a lot of sleep over, as it still remains strong – the preferreds are better protected than the sub-debt of a lot of global banks – but … geez, the direction’s wrong!

I won’t discuss the annual results to any great extent – there will be innumerable reports over the next few months released by analysts with a great deal more time to spend on the matter than I have.

Update: An Assiduous Reader pointed out, with great charm and delicacy, that I am a bonehead. My initial attempt to calculate “Equity Capital” in the “Issuance Capacity” table was incorrect, as I did not include non-controlling interest in my first go-round. This adjustment has now been made. The source data are in the table “Risk-Adjusted Capital Ratios”, page 16 of the Supplementary.

NA
Equity Capital Calculation
2006
Source Description Source Value
Common Shareholders’ Equity 4,388
Non-Controlling Interest 9
Less: Goodwill 683
Less: Trading in short positions of own shares (gross) 2
PrefBlog Calculated Total 3,712

and

NA
Equity Capital Calculation
2007
Source Description Source Value
Common Shareholders’ Equity 4,220
Non-Controlling Interest 18
Less: Goodwill 703
Less: Trading in short positions of own shares (gross) 1
PrefBlog Calculated Total 3,534

2 Responses to “NA Tier 1 Capital : October 2007”

  1. […] Well … today the TD Bank and National Bank financials were analyzed … and, in addition, month-end is a-coming and duty calls with a shrill, unpleasant voice. […]

  2. […] Royal Bank has released its Fourth Quarter, 2007, Report and Supplementary Information; I will analyze this in the same format as was has been recently done for NA, BMO and TD. […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.