Category: Market Action

Trump has indicated his disdain for the World Trade Organization and for the Trans-Pacific Partnership while starting mini-trade wars with US allies, eliminating those potential avenues to increase pressure on China to be a freer trader. He’s got his own way of doing things:

Investors are dealing with a painful new reality: The trade war between the United States and China could last indefinitely.

The anxiety caused by that realization rippled through the stock markets on Monday. The S&P 500 tumbled 2.4 percent after China said it would increase tariffs on nearly $60 billion of American-made goods in response to a similar move last week by the Trump administration.
…
On Friday, Mr. Trump raised tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese-made goods.

But signs of economic worry also emerged in other financial markets on Monday. The price of Treasury bonds rose, as investors sought the safety of government securities. Prices for soybeans and copper, both of which are sensitive to global growth and trade, dropped. Interest rates rose in corporate bond markets, an indication that investors were seeking higher premiums in response to the increased economic risks of a worsening trade fight.

The trouble is, I think, that he doesn’t care. The point of all this is to impress Joe Lunchbucket, who is tired of all this pusillanimous talking and wants to see some action. And there’s no other point.

The five-year Canada yield was down 7bp to 1.55%, which didn’t do FixedResets a lot of good.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.47%, equivalent to 7.11% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield 3.71%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 340bp, a slight (and perhaps spurious) widening from the 335bp reported May 1.

Some might be interested in the Investment Executive Brokerage Report Card:

Not surprisingly, the strong growth in advisors’ businesses flowed through to their bottom lines: more than a fifth (20.8%) of Report Card respondents reported making over $1 million in annual compensation, up from 13.2% in last year’s survey.

Only 18.9% said they were earning less than $250,000 per year, down from 25% in last year’s survey. Only 2.4% said they make less than $100,000 per year (down from 3.8% in 2018).

Click for big

The US jobs number was excellent:

The unemployment rate fell to its lowest level in half a century last month, capping the longest streak of job creation in modern times and dispelling recession fears that haunted Wall Street at the start of the year.

The Labor Department reported Friday that employers added 263,000 jobs in April, well above what analysts had forecast. The unemployment rate sank to 3.6 percent.
…
The April data show little threat of troublesome inflation or other signs of excess. The length of the average workweek actually fell, while wage growth for the month was slightly below what was expected. Still, with average hourly earnings up 3.2 percent from a year ago, ordinary workers are finally sharing in the economy’s bounty.

And Canada is going digital:

All in all, Statistics Canada calculates that as of 2017, Canada’s digital economy was worth $109.7 billion, or about 5.5 per cent of the entire economy that year.

That’s a bigger economic bite than mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction (4.8 per cent), or retail (five per cent) or the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting sector took (at 1.8 per cent.)

It still lags behind manufacturing (10 per cent), construction (8.1 per cent) health care (7.5 per cent), and finance and insurance (6.7 per cent).
…
Between 2010 and 2017, Canada’s digital economy grew by 40.2 per cent, Statistics Canada said. That compares with 28 per cent in the rest of the economy. The digital economy outpaced the rest of the economy every year in that time frame except in 2011 and 2017, two years that saw strong growth in the energy sector.

Within the digital economy, telecommunications is the biggest sector, but it’s getting caught by other parts. E-commerce is the fastest-growing segment, going from $4.2 billion in 2010 to more than $13.6 billion in 2017.

It would be nice to see some comparable figures from our competitors, but it is nice to see some numbers.

Lots of Fed-betting today:

Treasury yields jumped as a wave of bets that the Fed will keep rates on hold longer than expected — before possibly cutting them — was unleashed in derivatives markets. Chairman Jerome Powell’s comments on the “transient” nature of factors keeping inflation below the target prompted a reassessment, with wagers on when a rate cut might happen shifting from December 2019 into 2020. The next clue on the health of the economy will be Friday’s jobs report.

This had an effect on Canadian bond yields, with the 5-Year Canada yield up 7bp to 1.61%.

The FOMC issued its statement:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March indicates that the labor market remains strong and that economic activity rose at a solid rate. Job gains have been solid, on average, in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Growth of household spending and business fixed investment slowed in the first quarter. On a 12-month basis, overall inflation and inflation for items other than food and energy have declined and are running below 2 percent. On balance, market-based measures of inflation compensation have remained low in recent months, and survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. In support of these goals, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 2-1/4 to 2-1/2 percent. The Committee continues to view sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective as the most likely outcomes. In light of global economic and financial developments and muted inflation pressures, the Committee will be patient as it determines what future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate may be appropriate to support these outcomes.

In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its maximum employment objective and its symmetric 2 percent inflation objective. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Michelle W. Bowman; Lael Brainard; James Bullard; Richard H. Clarida; Charles L. Evans; Esther L. George; Randal K. Quarles; and Eric S. Rosengren.

Scott Barlow in the Globe picks up on a piece by Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg about financial literacy:

This is well-meaning, but without a radical break from how financial literacy is taught, it is destined to be ineffective … There are some potential solutions for these issues:

No. 1. Hands-on education: Teaching finance is not well-served by the standard format of classroom lectures. Instead, if we want to make students proficient in budgeting, help them understand credit and teach them about investing, a better approach would be a learning experience from real life. Student-run businesses on campus, and internships at local businesses, or actual jobs in finance do better at showing students how to do these tasks than the lecture-and-test approach.

Student-run businesses on campus? How many door-to-door chocolate bar salesmen can the country actually support, anyway? As far as hands-on experience goes … most people have a job. If they’re not interested in how that business works, why are they going to seek out some heavily subsidized student pretend-business?

No. 2. Repetition: Unless financial literacy is constantly reinforced, as we noted above, it fades pretty fast. Core concepts need to be repeated and reinforced after graduation. It is not realistic for us to expect high schools to be able to accomplish this.

Some of the burden for repetition and reinforcement must fall on the private sector, particularly the financial industry itself. More firms need to make a commitment to integrate financial literacy in their client-services operations. The key is keep the basic concepts of compounding, cost drag, valuations, diversification and cyclicality in front of customers, ensuring that they understand and are familiar with the terms and concepts.

Sure. Right. If people were financially literate, at least 75% of the financial industry would go bankrupt. Where’s the incentive for teaching? And where are all these paragons of wisdom and virtue going to come from, anyway? Most financial professionals know nothing about finance, beyond a few platitudes about mumble-mumble risk and [unintelligible] expected returns – they’re salesmen who happen to be selling investments.

No. 3 … A complement to the real-life experiences (above) is a more Socratic method of instruction. Rather than mere lecturing, instructors should lead students on a guided hunt for information. Let the students figure out the ideas for themselves, with the instructor as the pilot. This sort of approach leads to harder-won knowledge, which tends to be more durable.

Rather than teaching a body of information to remember, education also needs to give students the skills to think critically, to puzzle through problems, to be skeptical, to ask questions. Unfortunately, this broader approach to problem solving and independent thinking is rarely on the curriculum, no matter the subject being taught.

That’s a pretty broad issue, given that critical thinking is supposed to be the whole point of education, the more so the further you progress. But people – in general – don’t want to think critically. They want to find something quickly that will confirm their bias and then they want to sit down and watch The Price is Right.

I’m not sure there is a good solution for The Financial Literacy Problem. In the first place, it’s not really all that important a problem: the only financial literacy most people need is:

• Work Hard
• Don’t blow your money on dumb stuff
• Pay off your mortgage (or, if you’re renting, just stick the $3.98 per week that’s left over in the bank).

Bang. Done. Ninety percent of the population is now as financially literate as they need to be. That wasn’t very hard, was it?

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.48%, equivalent to 7.12% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long corporates now yield 3.78%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (in this context, the “Seniority Spread”) is now about 335bp, unchanged from that reported April 24.

CPX has acquired a generation facility:

Capital Power Corporation (Capital Power or the Company) (TSX: CPX) announced today that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Goreway Power Station Holdings Inc., which owns the Goreway Power Station, an 875 megawatt (MW) natural gas combined cycle generation facility. Goreway Power Station Holdings Inc. is jointly owned by JERA Co. Inc., and Toyota Tsusho Corporation. The purchase price is $387 million in total cash consideration, subject to working capital and other closing adjustments, and the assumption of $590 million of project level debt (the Acquisition). The Acquisition is expected to close in the second quarter of 2019 and is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.

DBRS comments:

The Acquisition is expected to result in a modest improvement in CPC’s business risk profile by increasing (1) diversification out of the volatile Alberta market, (2) contracted revenues and (3) average contract length. DBRS views CPC’s financing plan for the Acquisition as having a neutral effect on the Company’s financial metrics. Overall, DBRS believes that the Acquisition will have a neutral impact on CPC’s credit assessment if the following occurs: (1) CPC effectively integrates the Facility into its portfolio; (2) the Acquisition is funded as planned at the announced transaction price; (3) the Facility is able to distribute cash to CPC as expected and (4) the project-level debt is non-recourse to CPC. DBRS notes that future material acquisitions by CPC without the issuance of additional common equity could negatively affect its financial metrics, which could result in DBRS taking a negative rating action.

There was a nice little pop in TXPR at the close today, but nothing special in the great scheme of things:

Click for Big

There were a lot of MOC Imbalances, but very few of them were for more than 100 shares. I have no idea what that might have been about … the only thing that occurs to me is ‘software testing’.