PrefBlog

There’s a bit more colour about the effect of the US jobs number, discussed March 6 on the treasury long bond:

Since hitting an all-time low of 2.22 percent on Jan. 30, Treasury 30-year bond yields have posted the biggest five-week jump in six years as better-than-forecast employment growth led investors to pull forward wagers for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates.
…
The 30-year bond yield rose 25 basis points, or 0.25 percentage point, this week to 2.84 percent, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices.

That pushed the yield increase to 62 basis points since January. The move is the biggest since a 1 percentage point rise in the five weeks ended Jan. 30, 2009, after the Fed said it was considering buying Treasuries to help stimulate economic growth.
…
Yields soared March 6 after the Labor Department reported the U.S. added 295,000 jobs last month, compared with a forecast for a 235,000 gain in a Bloomberg survey. The unemployment rate fell to 5.5 percent, an almost seven-year low, from 5.7 percent.

It was 12th straight month payrolls have increased by at least 200,000, the best run since March 1995. Payrolls rose 3.1 million in 2014, the most in 15 years.

And some colour on the effect of the suspension of Canadian forward guidance:

Pacific Investment Management Co.’s Ed Devlin is getting out of Canadian government bonds, and Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz is the reason why.

Mr. Devlin, who oversees about $17-billion (U.S.), including the Canadian portfolios for the world’s biggest manager of bond funds, said higher yields are needed to compensate for the risk of buying debt whipsawed by Mr. Poloz’s policy pronouncements.

“Investors should require a bigger risk premium to invest in these bonds,” Mr. Devlin said by phone from Los Angeles on Friday. “If you don’t know what they’re going to do, you should get paid more money to invest in them than if they were fairly predictable.”

And there are the usual arguments about this:

Gluskin-Sheff chief economist David Rosenberg said last week the confusion was putting the Bank of Canada’s credibility at risk.

“The fact that they decided to stop offering guidance and start serving up confusion makes me gun-shy about making a call,” Rosenberg told Bloomberg. “If you’re trying to promote economic growth, you probably don’t want to generate too much volatility in the financial markets to achieve that goal.”

But [Dominion Lending Centres Chief Economist Sherry] Cooper says Bay Street should spend more time watching the data, instead of obsessing about what the bank will do.

“What caused this hissy fit on Bay Street was the economists were wrong,” Cooper wrote in a note. “No one expected the rate cut, so caught with their proverbial pants down, the pundits dumped on Poloz for having misled them.”

Cooper said not only was Poloz right to cut rates, but she also sees no reason why the central bank should “telegraph rate moves in advance.”

“The lamentation over the loss of ‘forward guidance’ is pathetic .… Everyone knows that central bank action is data dependent. When the data surprise, all bets are off,” she wrote.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 15bp, FixedResets down 21bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 3bp. Volatility was down from the levels we’ve generally seen for the past three months. Volume was low.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.14 to be $1.20 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $1.07 cheap at its bid price of 24.75.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum, although it declined substantially today. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.L, resetting at +216 on 2019-6-19, bid at 23.91 to be $0.34 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.91 to be $0.38 cheap.

Click for Big

The fit on this series is actually quite reasonable – it’s the scale that makes it look so weird.

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PR.Z, resetting at +296bp on 2017-12-31, bid at 25.26 to be $0.45 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 24.42 and appears to be $0.61 rich.

Click for Big

This is just weird because the middle is expensive and the ends are cheap but anyway … FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.66, looks $1.56 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 23.77 and is $1.04 rich.

Click for Big

The cancellation of the previously announced deflationary environment had an immediate effect on the implied three month bill rate, with investment-grade pairs predicting an average over the next five years of a whopping 0.10%.

Not shown is the DC.PR.B / DC.PR.D pair, which implies an average rate of negative 1.77% until its exchange date 2019-9-30.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

Jobs, jobs, jobs!

The U.S. job-creation machine kept exceeding expectations in February. Wages continued to disappoint.

Employers added 295,000 workers to payrolls last month, more than forecast, and the unemployment rate dropped to 5.5 percent, the lowest in almost seven years, figures from the Labor Department showed Friday in Washington. Hourly earnings rose less than forecast.

A lingering appetite to boost headcounts comes as increased purchasing power from cheaper fuel helps drive consumer spending. The jobless rate has now reached the Federal Reserve’s range for what it considers full employment, keeping policy makers on course to raise interest rates this year as persistent job growth sets the stage for a pickup in wages.
…
The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a 235,000 advance in February payrolls. Estimates ranged from 150,000 to 370,000. Employment in January climbed 239,000. The drop in the unemployment rate was also bigger than projected, and down from 5.7 percent in January.

Average hourly earnings rose 0.1 percent from the prior month after advancing 0.5 percent in January, which was the most since November 2008. The median forecast called for a 0.2 percent gain. Earnings were up 2 percent over the past year, also less than projected and matching the increase on average since the expansion began in mid-2009.

So the previously scheduled deflation has been cancelled:

U.S. stocks fell, with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index tumbling the most in two months, as better-than-forecast jobs data fueled speculation the Federal Reserve is moving closer to raising interest rates.
…
The S&P 500 fell 1.4 percent, the most since Jan. 5, to 2,071.26 at 4 p.m. in New York. The equity gauge lost 1.6 percent for the week. The Dow retreated 278.94 points, or 1.5 percent, to 17,856.78 for its worst drop in five weeks. The Nasdaq Composite Index slipped 1.1 percent. More than 7.4 billion shares changed hands on U.S. exchanges, 7.2 percent above the 30-day average.
…
Utility companies in the S&P 500 tumbled 3.1 percent. Selling picked up in the industry as the rate on 10-year Treasury notes spiked 13 basis points to 2.25 percent, the highest this year. The group’s dividend yield of 3.7 percent is the second-highest in the index.

AllBanc Split Corp., proud issuer of ABK.PR.C, was confirmed at Pfd-2 by DBRS:

Since the last rating action in March 2014, the net asset value of the Company has been slightly volatile, mirroring the performance of Canadian banks over the past year. However, downside protection rose from 60.1% on February 20, 2014, to 62.6% as of February 26, 2015. As a result, the rating of the Class C Preferred Shares has been confirmed at Pfd-2.

It was a mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 9bp, FixedResets gaining 26bp and DeemedRetractibles down 15bp. The Performance Highlights table is its usual lengthy self. Volume was high.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.14 to be $1.18 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $1.10 cheap at its bid price of 24.71.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum, although it declined substantially today. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.L, resetting at +216 on 2019-6-19, bid at 24.91 to be $0.30 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.88 to be $0.47 cheap.

Click for Big

The fit on this series is actually quite reasonable – it’s the scale that makes it look so weird.

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PF.X, resetting at +188bp on 2017-6-30, bid at 18.68 to be $0.17 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 24.45 and appears to be $0.68 rich.

Click for Big

This is just weird because the middle is expensive and the ends are cheap but anyway … FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.70, looks $1.51 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 23.80 and is $1.13 rich.

Click for Big

The cancellation of the previously announced deflationary environment had an immediate effect on the implied three month bill rate, with investment-grade pairs predicting an average over the next five years of a whopping 0.10%.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?

Canadians are loading up on debt:

Canadians have taken on $80-billion worth of mortgages, personal loans and credit card debt in the past year, Royal Bank of Canada found, with much of that growth coming in the past three months. Household debt totalled $1.82-trillion in January, eclipsing the country’s GDP, which stood at an annualized $1.65-trillion in December.

Most of the growth came from new residential mortgages, which rose 5.4 per cent in January compared to a year earlier, to nearly $1.3-trillion.
…
Homeowners weren’t the only ones taking on new debt. Business credit jumped 8.3 per cent in January, the fastest rate of expansion since 2007 as worries over the oil sector pushed more companies toward short-term loans, RBC said.

With all that, it’s a good thing we’ve all got good jobs!

Several reports have concluded that the country’s job market is not as strong as it looks and now a study from Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce paints an even worse picture. According to the bank’s analysis, job quality has fallen to its lowest level in more than two decades. A CIBC index that measures 25 years worth of data on part-time versus full-time work, paid versus self-employment and compensation trends, has fallen to its lowest level on record.
…
One notable shift is that a smaller portion of the labour market now has higher bargaining power, or high-paying jobs, while a larger segment has lower bargaining power, [Benjamin Tal, CIBC’s deputy chief economist,] said. “This is the main reason why the income gap is rising, which I believe is the number one economic, social issue facing the country in this decade.”

The CIBC index tracks three components, all of which are showing a deterioration. The first indicated that the number of part-time positions has risen “much faster” than that of full-time jobs since the 1980s. (Over the past year, though, some of this has reversed as full-time jobs rose faster). Self-employment is another measure, as economists tend to view it as less stable and, on average, lower paying than salaried employment. The number of self-employed workers has been on a “steeper incline” over the past 25 years, and in the past year grew four times faster than the number of paid employees, the CIBC report said.

On compensation, the bank said low-paying full-time jobs have risen faster than mid-paying jobs over much of the past two decades, which in turn have risen more quickly than high-paying jobs. And in the past year “the job-creation gap between low- and high-paying jobs has widened,” with low-wage full-time paid positions rising at twice the pace of high-paying jobs.

Mark Cuban may not be the most academic of sources, but he probably knows more than I do about the problems of angel investors:

For those who can’t figure out how to be Angels. You can sign up to be part of the new excitement called Equity Crowd Funding. Equity Crowd Funding allows you to join the masses to chase investments with as little as 5k dollars. Oh the possibilities !!

I have absolutely not doubt in my mind that most of these individual Angels and crowd funders are currently under water in their investments. Absolutely none. I say most. The percentage could be higher

Why ?

Because there is ZERO liquidity for any of those investments. None. Zero. Zip.

All those Angel investments in all those apps and startups. All that crowdfunded equity. All in search of their unicorn because the only real salvation right now is an exit or cash pay out from operations. The SEC made sure that there is no market for any of these companies to go public and create liquidity for their Angels. The market for sub 25mm dollar raises is effectively dead. DOA . Gone. Thanks SEC. And with the new Equity CrowdFunding rules yet to be finalized, there is no reason to believe that the SEC will be smart enough to create some form of liquidity for all those widows and orphans who will put their $5k into the dream only to realize they can’t get any cash back when they need money to fix their car.

Longevity risk has been a fascination of mine over the past few years; it was briefly mentioned yesterday. But there are interesting wrinkles with respect to women:

Black women have a much higher mortality rate, but it has declined significantly—23 percent since 1999. Hispanic women also posted declines. (Hispanics of all age groups, both men and women, have lower mortality rates than average, a demographic phenomenon known as the Hispanic paradox.)

Part of the jump in the death rate for whites is explained by the epidemic of prescription painkiller abuse and overdoses that disproportionately affected whites. But that accounts for only half the total increase, according to the report. Other causes of death on the rise include suicide and respiratory disease. Some declined, including traffic deaths, homicides, and the cancers most closely linked to smoking.
…
The pattern may reflect “a systematic reversal in the long-term trend of mortality decline” for white women, according to the Urban Institute paper. Such a shift could be linked to social and economic circumstances. Poorer people generally have poorer health for a variety of reasons, and growing inequality could be weighing on death rates.

“It’s possible that as this group of women ages, there could be a reversal of a very long-term decline in the death rate,” said Nan Marie Astone, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and the lead author of the report. America isn’t really used to the idea of declining life expectancy. The next few decades might change that.

Click for Big

Click for Big

It was a quiet, mixed day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 7bp, FixedResets down 8bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 1bp. Enbridge FixedResets were prominent in the bad part of the Performance Highlights table. Volume was quite high, with eight issues breaking the 100,000 barrier.

For as long as the FixedReset market is so violently unsettled, I’ll keep publishing updates of the more interesting and meaningful series of FixedResets’ Implied Volatilities. This doesn’t include Enbridge because although Enbridge has a large number of issues outstanding, all of which are quite liquid, the range of Issue Reset Spreads is too small for decent conclusions. The low is 212bp (ENB.PR.H; second-lowest is ENB.PR.D at 237bp) and the high is a mere 268 for ENB.PF.G.

Remember that all rich /cheap assessments are:
» based on Implied Volatility Theory only
» are relative only to other FixedResets from the same issuer
» assume constant GOC-5 yield
» assume constant Implied Volatility
» assume constant spread

Here’s TRP:

Click for Big

TRP.PR.E, which resets 2019-10-30 at +235, is bid at 24.37 to be $1.38 rich, while TRP.PR.G, resetting 2020-11-30 at +296, is $1.16 cheap at its bid price of 24.70.

Click for Big

Another excellent fit, but the numbers are perplexing. Implied Volatility for MFC continues to be a conundrum, although it declined substantially today. It is still too high if we consider that NVCC rules will never apply to these issues; it is still too low if we consider them to be NVCC non-compliant issues (and therefore with Deemed Maturities in the call schedule).

Most expensive is MFC.PR.M, resetting at +236 on 2019-12-19, bid at 24.61 to be $0.34 rich, while MFC.PR.H, resetting at +313bp on 2017-3-19, is bid at 25.85 to be $0.55 cheap.

Click for Big

The fit on this series is actually quite reasonable – it’s the scale that makes it look so weird.

The cheapest issue relative to its peers is BAM.PF.F, resetting at +286bp on 2019-9-30, bid at 25.117 to be $0.26 cheap. BAM.PF.E, resetting at +255bp 2020-3-31 is bid at 24.30 and appears to be $0.54 rich.

Click for Big

This is just weird because the middle is expensive and the ends are cheap but anyway … FTS.PR.H, with a spread of +145bp, and bid at 16.74, looks $1.48 cheap and resets 2015-6-1. FTS.PR.K, with a spread of +205bp and resetting 2019-3-1, is bid at 23.79 and is $1.06 rich.

Click for Big

This is rather odd – the investment grade break-even rates are clustered around zero, with one outlier: the TRP.PR.A / TRP.PR.F pair, clocking in at more realistic 1.04%.

Click for Big

Shall we just say that this exhibits a high level of confidence in the continued rapacity of Canadian banks?