April 21, 2011

April 21st, 2011

There’s a hot new investment product being flogged in Somalia – piracy futures:

Piracy syndicates are selling shares in planned attacks, fueled by a surge of ransom payments that help attract investors, the U.S. Chief of Naval Operations said.

Piracy syndicates in villages, mainly in largely ungoverned Somalia, solicit investors who buy shares in the attack missions and gain a corresponding share of ransoms paid by the shipping industry, Admiral Gary Roughead said.

The world deserves this, because we’re all wimps now. As I said on August 3:

Julius Caesar knew what to do about pirates; so did Thomas Jefferson.

Maybe the shipping companies should just pay the next ransom in Apple products:

[Alasdair] Allan and former Apple software engineer Pete Warden said they stumbled upon the file where all the location data was being stored by accident while toying with the iPhone to see what other data could be pulled from the device. They were surprised to find a file with about 29,000 logs of their whereabouts — about a year’s worth.

They determined that Apple’s iOS 4 operating system for the iPhone and iPad 3G is logging latitude-longitude coordinates along with the time stamp of when a spot was visited. The data is transferred to the hard drive of a computer when the 3G iPhone or iPad is synched.

And, given that I’m basically ignoring fixed income in today’s report, let’s wrap up with some political F-35 news:

It may cost as much as $1 trillion to operate the military’s fleet of Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) F-35 aircraft for several decades, according to a preliminary Pentagon estimate sent to Congress.

The figure is 9.3 percent more than the $915 billion estimate by the Defense Department in its 2009 Selected Acquisition Report to Congress.

The long-term cost estimate, which includes inflation, was submitted to Congress on April 15 in a report obtained by Bloomberg News. It assumes 8,000 hours of flying time for each of the 2,443 aircraft over a 30-year period. The Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps have their own variations of the aircraft, with the last in the fleet to be produced in 2035.

We’re supposed to be buying 65 of them, so our cost should only be about $26.6-billion based on the US estimates, assuming we don’t experience higher unit costs for a smaller-scale programme.

In news related to the Canadian preferred share market that is supposed to be the subject of this blog, it was a pretty quiet day, with PerpetualDiscounts down 5bp, FixedResets gaining 5bp and DeemedRetractibles basically flat. Volatility continued to be low; volume was average, albeit with some big blocks changing hands.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0000 % 2,414.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0000 % 3,630.8
Floater 2.50 % 2.26 % 36,118 21.64 4 0.0000 % 2,606.6
OpRet 4.92 % 3.59 % 59,180 2.07 8 0.0096 % 2,412.0
SplitShare 5.19 % -1.56 % 88,687 0.64 6 -0.1087 % 2,498.1
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0096 % 2,205.5
Perpetual-Premium 5.80 % 5.60 % 118,633 6.14 8 0.1393 % 2,049.8
Perpetual-Discount 5.58 % 5.57 % 135,765 14.38 16 -0.0452 % 2,120.6
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.46 % 203,740 2.92 57 0.0515 % 2,293.5
Deemed-Retractible 5.29 % 5.27 % 299,876 8.13 53 -0.0023 % 2,073.5
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.83 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-21
Maturity Price : 22.88
Evaluated at bid price : 23.07
Bid-YTW : 5.38 %
IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible -1.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.71
Bid-YTW : 6.37 %
PWF.PR.O Perpetual-Premium 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2018-11-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.25
Bid-YTW : 5.65 %
BAM.PR.T FixedReset 1.10 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-21
Maturity Price : 23.04
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 4.71 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
RY.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 361,029 RBC crossed 354,400 at 24.23.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.04
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %
RY.PR.X FixedReset 121,560 RBC crossed blocks of 23,200 at 27.10 and 55,000 at 27.15; then bought 10,800 from TD at 27.15 again.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-09-23
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.10
Bid-YTW : 3.52 %
CM.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 107,161 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 23.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.50
Bid-YTW : 5.25 %
CM.PR.I Deemed-Retractible 104,770 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 23.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.90
Bid-YTW : 5.26 %
BNS.PR.K Deemed-Retractible 67,359 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 24.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.25
Bid-YTW : 5.19 %
BMO.PR.Q FixedReset 36,650 Anonymous sold 10,000 to Scotia at 25.00 and the same amount at the same price to Desjardins.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 3.89 %
There were 33 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BNA.PR.E SplitShare Quote: 24.36 – 24.89
Spot Rate : 0.5300
Average : 0.3761

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2017-12-10
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.36
Bid-YTW : 5.45 %

RY.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 26.81 – 27.16
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2354

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.81
Bid-YTW : 3.48 %

RY.PR.B Deemed-Retractible Quote: 24.04 – 24.30
Spot Rate : 0.2600
Average : 0.1685

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.04
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %

RY.PR.L FixedReset Quote: 26.42 – 26.79
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2858

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.42
Bid-YTW : 3.34 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.50 – 22.94
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.3603

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-21
Maturity Price : 22.35
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 5.18 %

FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.07 – 23.50
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.3526

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-21
Maturity Price : 22.88
Evaluated at bid price : 23.07
Bid-YTW : 5.38 %

PSF.UN: Unusual Benchmarking! Nice Fees!

April 21st, 2011

Preferred Share Investment Trust was mentioned previously on PrefBlog, in the post Catapult Financial Offering Actively-Managed Preferred Share Trust. I haven’t paid much attention to it since, because the name is something of a misnomer – the indicative portfolio given in the prospectus was 32% bonds, 6% convertible bonds.

However, it was mentioned to me today so I thought I’d look it up: there are very few documents available on the fund’s official website, you have to go to SEDAR for the good stuff.

My first stop was the “Management report of fund performance – English”, filed 2011-3-31, and what immediately hit my eye was:

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Net Assets per unit of the Fund was $11.88 after payment of distributions to securityholders compared to $11.80 on December 31, 2009. The Fund paid cash distributions of $0.91 per unit during the year. The Fund had a total return of 8.4% compared to the S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index which returned 2.0%.

Huh? 2.0%?

It appears they are using the Price Index, not the total return index. The total return on the S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index was 7.73% in 2010. Price Index, Schmice Index. The long term expected return on the price index for any fixed income category is a big fat (all together now, folks! 3, 2, 1…) ZERO.

Right away I’ve lost all sympathy and most of my interest in these guys. Let’s just say that comparing fund total return to benchmark price return, particularly in the fixed income sector, is not quite strictly a practice I recommend, and leave it at that, OK? But I’ll soldier on and look at the “Audited annual financial statements – English”, also filed 2011-3-31.

At year-end 2010, they had $21.8-million in margin debt and $56.2-million in equity, for a leverage factor of 1.39:1, while at year end 2009, the figures were $14.3-million, $69.6-million, 1.21:1. So they were levered up big-time during a bull market and were only just able to beat their benchmark after fees.

Ah yes, fees.

TheManager is entitled to an annual fee of 2.10% based on the Net Asset Value of the Fund. This fee is calculated daily and payable monthly in arrears. The Manager is responsible for fees payable to the Portfolio Manager.

In addition, the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to the service fee payable to dealers, which is equal to 0.40% annually of the Net Asset Value of the Fund held by clients of the sales representatives of dealers. This fee is calculated daily and paid quarterly in arrears.

The Fund is responsible for all costs relating to its administration.

The total MER is reported in the Fund Performance hand-out. 3.33%. Nice work if you can get it!

The portfolio at year end was:

  • CAD Preferreds 73.49% (no breakdown by type)
  • USD Preferreds 3.71%
  • CAD ‘bonds, notes and convertibles’ 19.58%
  • USD ‘bonds, notes and convertibles’ 3.08%
  • Gain on USD to CAD forwards 0.14%

Sadly, I have no more interest in the fund now than I had this morning.

April 20, 2011

April 20th, 2011

DBRS confirmed Transcontinental at Pfd-3(high); the ticker is TCL.PR.D.

The Canadian preferred share market had mixed returns today as, in a reversal of recent form, PerpetualDiscounts lost 7bp, FixedResets were essentially flat and DeemedRetractibles gained 13bp. Volatility remained subdued. Volume was high.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.58%, equivalent to 7.25% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long Corporates now yield about 5.5%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread (also called the Seniority Spread) is now about 175bp, a slight (and perhaps spurious) increase from the 170bp reported April 13.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0833 % 2,414.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0833 % 3,630.8
Floater 2.50 % 2.26 % 36,155 21.64 4 0.0833 % 2,606.6
OpRet 4.92 % 3.49 % 59,371 2.07 8 -0.1636 % 2,411.7
SplitShare 5.19 % -1.55 % 89,901 0.65 6 0.3035 % 2,500.8
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1636 % 2,205.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.80 % 5.72 % 118,141 6.13 8 -0.0249 % 2,047.0
Perpetual-Discount 5.58 % 5.58 % 128,367 14.40 16 -0.0678 % 2,121.6
FixedReset 5.16 % 3.46 % 205,036 2.92 57 -0.0027 % 2,292.3
Deemed-Retractible 5.28 % 5.29 % 303,850 8.13 53 0.1294 % 2,073.6
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
IAG.PR.C FixedReset 1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.17
Bid-YTW : 3.03 %
IAG.PR.F Deemed-Retractible 1.59 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.52
Bid-YTW : 5.66 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CIU.PR.B FixedReset 204,442 Nesbitt crossed 200,000 at 27.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.61
Bid-YTW : 3.59 %
BMO.PR.O FixedReset 76,782 TD crossed blocks of 20,000 shares, 25,000 and 10,000, all at 27.66.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.69
Bid-YTW : 3.31 %
RY.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 54,670 Desjardins crossed 25,600 at 23.70.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.75
Bid-YTW : 5.17 %
BNS.PR.Z FixedReset 52,031 Desjardins crossed 30,000 at 24.47, then bought 12,000 from Nesbit at 24.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.39
Bid-YTW : 4.08 %
TD.PR.Q Deemed-Retractible 40,122 TD bought 14,500 from RBC at 25.60, then crossed 15,000 at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-03-02
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.56
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %
RY.PR.Y FixedReset 34,275 RBC crossed 15,000 at 27.44.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-12-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.44
Bid-YTW : 3.58 %
There were 45 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
FTS.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 26.21 – 26.71
Spot Rate : 0.5000
Average : 0.3734

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-10-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.21
Bid-YTW : 3.43 %

ELF.PR.F Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.55 – 22.94
Spot Rate : 0.3900
Average : 0.2853

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.55
Bid-YTW : 6.63 %

GWO.PR.H Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.23 – 22.60
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2662

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.23
Bid-YTW : 6.35 %

TD.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 26.44 – 26.76
Spot Rate : 0.3200
Average : 0.2256

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-02
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.44
Bid-YTW : 3.43 %

PWF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount Quote: 24.30 – 24.69
Spot Rate : 0.3900
Average : 0.3078

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-20
Maturity Price : 23.99
Evaluated at bid price : 24.30
Bid-YTW : 5.67 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.50 – 22.85
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2729

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-20
Maturity Price : 22.35
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 5.18 %

April 19, 2011

April 19th, 2011

A European has said something sensible!

As European finances continue to decay, one of the central bankers at the heart of the sovereign debt crisis departs his post with a lament for lack of political leadership.

Calling the crisis a “man-made” problem, Nout Wellink, the outgoing Dutch central bank president and member of the European Central Bank’s governing council, blamed irresponsible fiscal policy that left the ECB no choice but to wade into murky, unfamiliar waters beyond its mandate of price stability.

“The ECB has increasingly been burdened with solving problems that do not form part of her core task, because other authorities failed to take responsibility,” Mr. Wellink said in a speech in Toronto on Monday.
“And I’m talking about politicians. Politicians should not shy away from solving problems in the hope that central banks will come to the rescue.”

And the domino theory is making a comeback:

European investors and politicians prodding Greece to restructure its debt may end up wishing they hadn’t.

Talk of restructuring spurred by Germany risks re-igniting Europe’s debt crisis, enveloping Spain just weeks after European leaders said bailouts of Greece, Ireland and Portugal ended contagion. Under a Greek default, Europe’s financial system would strain as banks in and outside Greece and holders of Greek bonds, such as the European Central Bank and domestic pension funds, tally losses.

“By restructuring Greek debt you also may precipitate a crisis in Spain,” David Watts, a strategist at CreditSights Inc. in London, said in a telephone interview. “At that point it doesn’t matter how much you’ve saved by restructuring Greece, the fallout from Spain is much greater. The issue comes back to not knowing the ultimate cost.”

French and German lenders accounted for almost two-thirds of lending to Greek public and private debtors as of Sept. 30, according to the Bank for International Settlements. French banks held $59.4 billion and German banks $40.3 billion, followed by U.K. and Portuguese lenders to Greece.

European central bankers have also pushed back against Germany after the ECB bought an estimated 76 billion euros ($108 billion) in bonds to try to stem the crisis. ECB President Jean- Claude Trichet was thwarted by European Union leaders who rejected his bid to shift the bond-purchase program to the EU’s 440 billion-euro European Financial Stability Facility.

Greek 10-year debt trades for 60 cents and yields 14.26 percent, more than 11 percentage points higher than benchmark German bunds. Two-year Greek yields soared above 20 percent and credit-default swaps signal a 64.5 percent chance of default within five years.

We know that Black Friday and the Great Depression caused Americans to swear off equities for a generation. Could the same thing be happening in real estate?:

The most affordable real estate in a generation is failing to lure buyers as Americans like Pauli sour on the idea of home ownership. At the end of 2010, the fourth year of the housing collapse, the share of people who said a home was a safe investment dropped to 64 percent from 70 percent in the first quarter. The December figure was the lowest in a survey that goes back to 2003, when it was 83 percent.

“The magnitude of the housing crash caused permanent changes in the way some people view home ownership,” said Michael Lea, a finance professor at San Diego State University. “Even as the economy improves, there are some who will never buy a home because their confidence in real estate is gone.”

The SEC is requesting comment on effective Investor Education programmes. What’s even more amazing is that the detailed request includes such revolutionary nit-picking as:

Please describe the program, including its duration, target audience, and any measurable goals and objectives aimed at changing investor behavior.

If yes, please describe the findings of the evaluation, including any statistical evidence of how your program effectively changed one or more investor behaviors among participants.

“Measurable”? “Evidence”? “Effectively”? What is this? What are they doing? Don’t they realize that the purpose of public investor education programmes is to give money to public investor educators? What’s all this “measurement” and “effectiveness” crap?

Who wants to know about cash drag? Here’s an article about cash drag:

The Teacher Retirement System of Texas needs an annual return of 21 percent in the year ending Aug. 31 to maintain an 80 percent funded ratio, the level actuaries consider adequate to cover liabilities, said its deputy director.

“We’d have to have remarkable investment returns for the rest of the year to reach 80 percent,” Brian Guthrie, the fund’s executive director-designate, said at a Texas House hearing today in Austin.

Even with the gains, the pension’s funded ratio — the portion of promised benefits covered by current assets — dropped to 81.3 percent as of Feb. 28 from 82.9 percent on Aug. 31, 2010, because of trading losses in 2008 and 2009 included through a process called smoothing, Executive Director Ronnie Jung said April 7.

Fortunately, the Texas legislature is taking prompt and decisive action:

Texas legislators are considering reducing the state’s contribution to the fund, which is now 6.64 percent of employees’ salaries.

So are many employees:

California, Florida and Texas are seeing more retirements as rising benefit costs, pay cuts and looming furloughs prompt workers to leave. Inducements to quit early also boosted departures in New York as U.S. states tackled budget gaps totaling more than $540 billion since fiscal 2009, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. In New Jersey, Wisconsin and Ohio, added motivation came from attacks on unions over costs that strained budgets.

DBRS confirmed Canadian Utilities and also confirmed CU Inc..

The politicians can’t resist proposing changes to the TMX/LSE deal:

A deal between the operators of the Toronto and London stock exchanges should live up to its billing as a “merger of equals” by giving Canada a bigger voice on the combined entity’s board of directors, says an influential committee of the Ontario Legislature.

The board should consist of an equal number of directors from Canada and the United Kingdom, and the transaction should preserve the Toronto Stock Exchange’s role as the global leader in raising equity for mining companies, a report by an all-party committee says.

“Ontario has been very successful with its financial services sector, and the TMX is a significant part of that,” Gerry Phillips, chairman of the committee, told reporters. “If the centre of gravity does in fact shift from here to London, it does raise risks of us not having the same success we’ve had.”

“We” and “us”, eh, Mr. Phillips? Just what exactly have you had to do with it? Supply evidence of your effectiveness!

Here’s something interesting: Milevsky and Macqueen wrote a book called Pensionize Your Nest Egg last year, touting “Product Allocation” as the key to a happy retirement. Now Manulife has started a website with that title at http://www.productallocation.ca/home/ … which is officially to be read only if one is a “Dealer, Broker or Advisor affiliated with Manulife Financial”. I see a link titled RSQ on the page, but sadly, once I click “I Disagree” I’m kicked off the site.

It would be most interesting to learn what financial arrangements, if any, exist between Manulife, the authors and the authors’ institutions and what input, if any, Manulife had in the preparation of the book. A Manulife functionary is given pride of place in the acknowledgments of outside readers.

After months of intensive research, Torture-Boy has figured out how a parliamentary system works. What-Debt? considers the idea rather obscene.

The Canadian preferred share market had a respite today from the steady drip-drip-drip of negative returns, with all three main sectors gaining a little ground: PerpetualDiscounts were up 8bp, FixedResets won 6bp and DeemedRetractibles inched up 2bp. Not much volatility, with only one Performance Highlight. Volume was good.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1085 % 2,412.1
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1085 % 3,627.8
Floater 2.50 % 2.26 % 36,281 21.64 4 0.1085 % 2,604.4
OpRet 4.91 % 3.05 % 55,570 2.07 8 -0.0529 % 2,415.7
SplitShare 5.20 % -0.37 % 93,361 0.65 6 -0.1206 % 2,493.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0529 % 2,208.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.80 % 5.74 % 119,401 6.14 8 0.0000 % 2,047.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.58 % 5.62 % 126,045 14.39 16 0.0759 % 2,123.0
FixedReset 5.16 % 3.50 % 205,793 2.93 57 0.0584 % 2,292.4
Deemed-Retractible 5.28 % 5.29 % 305,501 8.15 53 0.0181 % 2,070.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-19
Maturity Price : 22.78
Evaluated at bid price : 22.99
Bid-YTW : 5.40 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 156,073 RBC crossed blocks of 50,000 and 100,000, both at 27.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.50
Bid-YTW : 3.56 %
CM.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 80,450 Nesbitt crossed 70,000 at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.22
Bid-YTW : 4.79 %
SLF.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 56,768 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 22.40.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.40
Bid-YTW : 6.20 %
TRP.PR.B FixedReset 54,611 RBC crossed 49,300 at 25.15.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-19
Maturity Price : 25.11
Evaluated at bid price : 25.16
Bid-YTW : 3.85 %
RY.PR.D Deemed-Retractible 42,265 TD Crossed 35,000 at 23.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.67
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %
BMO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible 34,960 Nesbitt crossed 25,000 at 26.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.01
Bid-YTW : 5.23 %
There were 37 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
IAG.PR.C FixedReset Quote: 26.85 – 27.50
Spot Rate : 0.6500
Average : 0.4072

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.85
Bid-YTW : 3.50 %

FTS.PR.C OpRet Quote: 26.13 – 26.50
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2534

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-05-19
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.13
Bid-YTW : -3.94 %

PWF.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 25.58 – 25.92
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2452

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-03-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.58
Bid-YTW : 3.86 %

IAG.PR.F Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.12 – 25.60
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.4012

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.12
Bid-YTW : 5.91 %

GWO.PR.M Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.26 – 25.60
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2639

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.26
Bid-YTW : 5.72 %

FTS.PR.G FixedReset Quote: 26.20 – 26.50
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2346

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-10-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 3.45 %

April 18, 2011

April 18th, 2011

Today the US got a wake-up call:

Standard & Poor’s put a “negative” outlook on the U.S. AAA credit rating, citing rising budget deficits and debt.

“We believe there is a material risk that U.S. policy makers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium-and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013,” New York-based S&P said in a report today. “If an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation does not begin by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer ‘AAA’ sovereigns.”

The markets reacted immediately:

U.S. stocks sank the most in a month as Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service cut the nation’s long-term credit outlook to negative. Ten-year Treasuries erased earlier gains and the cost to protect corporate bonds from default climbed to the highest level this month.

The S&P 500 declined 1.5 percent to 1,300.24 at 9:58 a.m. in New York, its biggest drop since March 16. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note climbed three basis points to 3.44 percent after declining four basis points earlier. The dollar was up 1.1 percent at $1.4275 per euro. Gold for June delivery advanced 0.5 percent to $1,493.50 an ounce.

This is a prime example of why I want investible entities to have credit ratings. Not because I can’t come to any conclusions myself, not because I worship the credit rating agencies, but because when they alter their opinions it serves as a focal point for discussion.

However, the announcement did not prevent do-goodism:

The U.S. offered a $2.1 billion loan guarantee to help Solar Trust of America LLC build the world’s largest solar-energy generating station in Southern California.

The project will create 484 megawatts of electricity to be transported over an eight-mile transmission line near Blythe, California, about 230 miles (370 kilometers) east of Los Angeles, according to an Energy Department statement.

“This is the largest amount offered to a solar project through the loans program office,” Energy Secretary Steven Chu said today on a conference call.

Oh well … mere loan guarantees never cost any money, right? I couldn’t find any discussion of the relative cost of this plan – which is suggestive in itself – but a 2008 US Government Report put Natural Gas at $61.77 / Mwh, vs. $100.32 for Solar Thermal.

Remember CalPERS? The humongous pension fund that can’t be bothered to do its own credit analysis? Here’s how they assess investment managers:

In late May 2004, Alfred Villalobos hosted a meeting at his home in Nevada, a few miles from Lake Tahoe and the California border. Villalobos, a former member of the CalPERS Board of Administration and a former Deputy Mayor of the City of Los Angeles, was joined by David Snow, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Medco Health Solutions, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit management (“PBM”) companies, and Fred Buenrostro, who was the Chief Executive Officer of CalPERS – a public official – at the time. We will not discuss the reported details of the conversations between Buenrostro, Villalobos and Snow regarding the CalPERS PBM contract Medco had lost years earlier, in deference to law enforcement authority requests and as we understand that the independent directors of the Medco board are also reviewing these events.

Soon after the May 2004 meeting at the Villalobos home, Medco agreed to retain Villalobos as a consultant and pay him $4 million. Medco agreed to pay Villalobos and his firm even though, as we understand it, Villalobos had no prior PBM counseling experience, and even though Medco had already hired another consulting firm to assist it in securing the CalPERS contract.

Snow would return to the Villalobos home for another meeting in September 2004, when we understand that Buenrostro and Villalobos were joined by three long-time colleagues: Charles “Chuck” Valdes, Kurato Shimada and Robert “Bob” Carlson. The five men – Villalobos, Buenrostro, Valdes, Shimada and Carlson – had served together on the CalPERS Board ten years earlier, when Buenrostro served as a representative for other California state officials. Valdes, Shimada and Carlson were all public officials and still members of the Board in 2004, and were reportedly introduced to Snow as such at the meeting. There were apparently other meetings over the next year between Snow and some or all of the five men, including what appear to have been private meetings at a Sacramento hotel and another at Medco’s Las Vegas pharmacy facility. That November, Buenrostro would also allow Villalobos to host Buenrostro’s wedding at the Villalobos home and reportedly pay for the new couple’s related expenses.

On October 18, 2005, the nine-member Health Benefits Committee of the CalPERS Board convened at a regularly scheduled meeting to interview finalists and to recommend to the full CalPERS Board the award of the PBM contract. Buenrostro attended as CalPERS CEO and was joined by Board members Valdes, Carlson and Shimada. Snow spoke on behalf of Medco, whom the CalPERS staff had already ranked as first choice among the candidates. Although it is unclear how it happened, Medco apparently obtained an internal copy of the Health Benefits Committee’s background documents. Health Benefits Committee members Valdes and Carlson voted in favor of awarding the contract to Medco, with Valdes making the motion to recommend the award of the PBM contract to Medco. That motion passed and Medco was awarded the contract. (Years later, as has been publicly reported, Valdes would invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when government attorneys questioned him about the PBM contract.) Notably, Board member Shimada also attended the Committee meeting and asked a number of questions of the candidates, even though he was not a Health Benefits Committee member. While there, Shimada asked that his questions be reflected in the official record, along with unspecified others that he said he had planned to ask but that had already been posed by the members of the Health Benefits Committee.

Medco apparently had a check cut for hand-delivery that same day – a $1 million payment to Villalobos, the final installment of the initial $4 million agreement. Thereafter, Medco would pay Villalobos a $20,000 monthly retainer, reportedly until sometime in 2009 when Villalobos’ placement agent activities relating to investment managers came under public scrutiny.

They’re not alone. This is an ongoing scandal in the US.

Some shops aren’t just buying gold – they’re buying physical gold:

Dallas hedge-fund manager J. Kyle Bass helped advise the University of Texas Investment Management Co. on taking delivery of 6,643 gold bars, worth $987 million on April 15, now stored in a bank warehouse in New York.

Bass, who made $500 million with 2006 bets on a U.S. subprime-mortgage market collapse, said managers of the endowment, known as UTIMCO, sought board approval to convert its gold investments into bullion this year. A board member, Bass, 41, said he was asked to help with that process.

The Texas fund’s $19.9 billion in assets ranked it behind only Harvard University’s endowment as of August, according to the National Association of College and University Business Officers. Last year, UTIMCO added about $500 million in gold investments to an existing stake, said Bruce Zimmerman, the endowment’s chief executive officer. The fund’s managers sought to take delivery of bullion to protect against demand for the metal overwhelming supply, according to Bass.

Open interest in gold futures and options traded on the Comex typically exceeds supplies held in its warehouses. If the holders of just 5 percent of those contracts opted to take delivery of the metal, there wouldn’t be enough to cover the demand, Bass said.

The Finns are kicking about paying for Greece:

Finland’s euro-skeptic bloc is poised to form a government with the pro-Europe National Coalition led by Finance Minister Jyrki Katainen after voters used yesterday’s election to protest against funding bailouts.

The True Finns, whose leader Timo Soini says taxpayers shouldn’t have helped rescue Greece or Ireland, jumped almost 15 points to 19 percent, the Justice Ministry said. Katainen’s National Coalition won 20.4 percent to become Finland’s biggest party for the first time. Prime Minister Mari Kiviniemi’s Center Party got 15.8 percent and the Social Democrats, which also opposed bailouts for Greece and Ireland, won 19.1 percent. Kiviniemi will lead her party in opposition after its “huge defeat,” she told broadcaster YLE.

“They could not leave the True Finns out of government after this landslide,” said Tuomo Martikainen, professor emeritus in political science at the University of Helsinki, by phone. “It would be making a mockery of democracy.”

Perhaps Mr. Martikainen should consult our own What-Debt? about the construction of coalitions in a democracy!

There were very disparate returns in the Canadian preferred share market today, with PerpetualDiscounts gaining 37bp, FixedResets losing 4bp and DeemedRetractibles getting whacked for 26bp. Volatility was fair, with five entries in the Performance Highlights table. Volume was on the light side.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0357 % 2,409.5
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0357 % 3,623.8
Floater 2.50 % 2.27 % 37,762 21.55 4 0.0357 % 2,601.6
OpRet 4.91 % 3.04 % 56,181 2.08 8 0.0963 % 2,417.0
SplitShare 5.20 % -1.54 % 96,938 0.65 6 0.1050 % 2,496.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0963 % 2,210.1
Perpetual-Premium 5.80 % 5.71 % 120,730 1.15 8 -0.0398 % 2,047.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.58 % 5.66 % 127,387 14.40 16 0.3727 % 2,121.4
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.48 % 206,969 2.93 57 -0.0385 % 2,291.0
Deemed-Retractible 5.28 % 5.30 % 309,674 8.16 53 -0.2621 % 2,070.5
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
IAG.PR.F Deemed-Retractible -1.42 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.05
Bid-YTW : 5.95 %
MFC.PR.D FixedReset -1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.24
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %
MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible -1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.76
Bid-YTW : 6.83 %
POW.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 1.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-18
Maturity Price : 22.38
Evaluated at bid price : 22.56
Bid-YTW : 5.57 %
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount 1.73 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-18
Maturity Price : 23.28
Evaluated at bid price : 23.50
Bid-YTW : 5.28 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
RY.PR.E Deemed-Retractible 113,892 Desjardins crossed 100,000 at 23.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.66
Bid-YTW : 5.27 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 98,880 Anonymous bought 17,900 from HSBC t 25.00; Nesbitt crossed 55,000 at 25.08.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.96
Bid-YTW : 4.16 %
CM.PR.G Deemed-Retractible 59,357 RBC crossed 42,400 at 24.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.95
Bid-YTW : 5.44 %
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 41,847 Nesbitt crossed 31,300 at 27.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.24
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %
BNS.PR.N Deemed-Retractible 37,738 Desjardins crossed 25,000 at 25.07.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-02-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.11
Bid-YTW : 5.16 %
CM.PR.I Deemed-Retractible 32,033 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.63
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
There were 25 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
BAM.PR.P FixedReset Quote: 27.51 – 28.00
Spot Rate : 0.4900
Average : 0.2842

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.51
Bid-YTW : 4.05 %

MFC.PR.D FixedReset Quote: 27.24 – 27.59
Spot Rate : 0.3500
Average : 0.2197

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.24
Bid-YTW : 3.88 %

IAG.PR.F Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.05 – 25.48
Spot Rate : 0.4300
Average : 0.3149

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.05
Bid-YTW : 5.95 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.58 – 22.95
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2852

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-18
Maturity Price : 22.43
Evaluated at bid price : 22.58
Bid-YTW : 5.16 %

TDS.PR.C SplitShare Quote: 10.50 – 10.80
Spot Rate : 0.3000
Average : 0.2214

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-12-15
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 10.50
Bid-YTW : -1.54 %

CM.PR.J Deemed-Retractible Quote: 23.31 – 23.60
Spot Rate : 0.2900
Average : 0.2116

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.31
Bid-YTW : 5.34 %

April 15, 2011

April 15th, 2011

The Bank of England has released a working paper by Iryna Kaminska, Andrew Meldrum and James Smith titled A global model of international yield curves: no-arbitrage term structure approach:

This paper extends a popular no-arbitrage affine term structure model to model jointly bond markets and exchange rates across the United Kingdom, United States and euro area. Using a monthly data set of forward rates from 1992, we first demonstrate that two global factors account for a significant proportion in the variation of bond yields across countries. We also show that, in order to explain country-specific movements in yield curves, local factors are required. Although we implement a very general factor structure, we find that our global factors are related to global inflation and global economic activity, while local factors are closely linked to monetary policy rates. In this respect our results are similar to previous work. But an important advantage of our joint international model is that we are able to decompose interest rates into risk-free rates and risk premia. Additionally, we are able to study the implications for exchange rates. We show that while differences in risk-free rates matter, to a large extent changes in the exchange rate are determined by time-varying exchange rate risk premia.

The Germans are laying the groundwork for a Greek default:

A Greek debt restructuring “would not be a disaster” and Germany would back a voluntary effort to ease the struggling euro member’s payment terms, Deputy Foreign Minister Werner Hoyer said. The euro and Greek bonds fell after his comments.

The remarks by Hoyer were the most explicit by a European official showing a 110 billion-euro ($159 billion) bailout for Greece may fail to prevent the first default by a euro country. His message contrasts with Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou’s pledge to avoid a restructuring.

Bonds of Europe’s most indebted nations fell for a third day after a Moody’s Investors Service downgrade of Ireland to the lowest investment grade and Hoyer’s comments. The yield on 10-year Greek debt jumped 55 basis points to 13.83 percent, widening the spread over German bunds to a record 1,045 basis points. The euro weakened 0.2 percent to $1.4454 at 12:10 p.m. in New York.

S&P has revised the trend on Sun Life Financial to “Stable” from “Negative”:

Sun Life’s 2010 after-tax operating earnings of C$1.58 billion–including C$301 million from the recovering U.S. insurance operations–met our expectations. In addition, earnings diversity and lower restrictions on dividends in Canada minimally support the continued narrowed notching between the holding-company and operating-company ratings. Consequently, we have revised the outlook on the holding company to stable from negative; the outlook on SLF’s North American subsidiaries remains stable. In addition, we have affirmed the ‘A’ rating on Sun Life Financial Inc. and the ‘AA-‘ ratings on its North American subsidiaries. On April 15, 2011, Standard&Poor’s Ratings Services revised its outlook on Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) to stable from negative.

Another depressing day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts off 7bp, FixedResets down 1bp and DeemedRetractibles losing 11bp. Volatility continued to be minimal, with only one entry in the Performance Highlights table. Volume picked up, but not to any notable level.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0238 % 2,408.6
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0238 % 3,622.5
Floater 2.50 % 2.27 % 39,122 21.55 4 -0.0238 % 2,600.7
OpRet 4.91 % 3.10 % 55,296 2.09 8 0.0000 % 2,414.6
SplitShare 5.20 % -1.52 % 100,780 0.66 6 -0.0530 % 2,493.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0000 % 2,208.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.80 % 5.69 % 122,161 6.15 8 -0.1143 % 2,048.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.60 % 5.66 % 127,352 14.37 16 -0.0681 % 2,113.5
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.47 % 206,049 2.94 57 -0.0106 % 2,291.9
Deemed-Retractible 5.27 % 5.26 % 313,425 8.17 53 -0.1077 % 2,075.9
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
HSB.PR.C Deemed-Retractible -1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.07
Bid-YTW : 5.62 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
HSE.PR.A FixedReset 166,040 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.62
Bid-YTW : 4.00 %
BMO.PR.Q FixedReset 92,302 Nesbitt crossed 75,000 at 24.95.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.93
Bid-YTW : 4.00 %
BMO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible 76,487 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 50,000 and 22,000, both at 26.10.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.10
Bid-YTW : 5.15 %
CM.PR.E Deemed-Retractible 73,205 RBC crossed blocks of 30,000 and 36,800, both at 25.12.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2012-11-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.12
Bid-YTW : 5.17 %
GWO.PR.L Deemed-Retractible 63,649 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.02.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 5.77 %
MFC.PR.F FixedReset 63,024 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 25.06.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.01
Bid-YTW : 4.25 %
There were 35 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.10 – 23.75
Spot Rate : 0.6500
Average : 0.5170

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-15
Maturity Price : 22.90
Evaluated at bid price : 23.10
Bid-YTW : 5.37 %

BAM.PR.X FixedReset Quote: 24.54 – 24.95
Spot Rate : 0.4100
Average : 0.2935

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-15
Maturity Price : 22.94
Evaluated at bid price : 24.54
Bid-YTW : 4.60 %

CM.PR.K FixedReset Quote: 26.25 – 26.57
Spot Rate : 0.3200
Average : 0.2262

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.25
Bid-YTW : 3.72 %

MFC.PR.C Deemed-Retractible Quote: 20.98 – 21.29
Spot Rate : 0.3100
Average : 0.2183

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.98
Bid-YTW : 6.69 %

PWF.PR.K Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.54 – 22.79
Spot Rate : 0.2500
Average : 0.1588

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-15
Maturity Price : 22.36
Evaluated at bid price : 22.54
Bid-YTW : 5.50 %

RY.PR.L FixedReset Quote: 26.79 – 27.15
Spot Rate : 0.3600
Average : 0.2785

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.79
Bid-YTW : 3.31 %

PrefLetter 2010 Annual Collection Released!

April 15th, 2011

The full collection of PrefLetters published in 2010 has been released and is now available for purchase via the PrefLetter website (click Subscribe Now).

The 2010 Collection includes the following appendices of varying length:

  • January: the calculation and utility of Implied Volatility for PerpetualDiscount issues (spreadsheet available)
  • February: the analytical treatment of “Strong Pairs” – issues that may be interconverted at the shareholder’s option on a periodic basis (spreadsheet available)
  • March: FixedResets, particularly the odd tax effects that unwary investors may find surprising (speadsheet available)
  • April: the investment relationship between Preferred Shares and Annuities
  • May: the recent slump in FixedReset issues and analyzes relative performance of these issues to draw a conclusion regarding the market’s valuation of these instruments
  • June: the mathematical basis for ‘easy’ approximations to yield and delves further into the method that the market is apparently using for relative valuation of FixedResets
  • July: the potential for calls of PerpetualDiscounts, given the market’s recent run-up and the potential for refinancing via FixedResets.
  • August: a review of FixedReset analysis and presents two pricing models for your consideration.
  • September: a review of some preferred share portfolios. Passive funds are very popular, but it is important to know all of their investment attributes, not just the “low fee”!
  • October: a review of Implied Volatility and how the remarkable “Summer Rally’ in PerpetualDiscount shares has dramatically increased the visibility of this important valuation metric.
  • November: a review of Market Impact, its relationship to portfolio management and its role in the Flash Crash of May 6. An additional appendix provides a summary of the trading of preferred shares on the Pure Trading exchange and corrects an error from the November, 2009, edition.
  • December: a review of the determinants of SplitShare credit quality and discusses a spreadsheet I have made available to readers for performing Monte-Carlo estimates of credit quality. (spreadsheet available)

The total length of the 2010 Annual Collection is 286 pages (file size about 11.2 MB) – much of this is, of course, the by now out of date recommendations of individual issues, but about half of the total is comprised of the appendices.

LimitMaturity

April 15th, 2011

I use the phrase because preferred shares can last forever; but taking account of this infinite length of time would require too many special cases in the software and take up too much computation time for very limited benefits – if any! I made the point a few times in the appendix to the April, 2011, PrefLetter that if you calculate more decimal places than are justified by the accuracy of your data, then you are really just wasting time fooling yourself.

So, instead of performing special calculations to account for the preferred share lasting forever, the software instead defines “forever” as “thirty years from the date of calculation”.

Thus, for example, the recommended BAM.PR.N issue is denoted with a “LimitMaturity”, since the fact that it is trading at a discount to par with no means by which an investor can force the company to redeem them means that it is prudent to assume they will last forever.

In order to analyze these shares in a manner consistent with all the other issues, the software then pretends, on the calculation date of 2011-4-8, that the issue will mature on 2041-4-8 at a price equal to its current price of 21.10. This assists in the computation of Modified Duration and PseudoConvexity.

In turn, this ensures that the calculations, and the valuations, are consistent with the calculations and valuations for those issues that really do mature (such as BNA.PR.C, for instance) and the increase in comparability is worth the slight loss of accuracy.

April 14, 2011

April 14th, 2011

Debt holders’ rights are being trampled in Ireland:

Ireland’s Finance Minister Michael Noonan said Allied Irish Bank Plc will seek to buy back subordinated debt in coming weeks and threatened to impose losses on holders that refuse the offer.

The government will “take whatever other action is necessary to ensure appropriate burden-sharing” with the lender’s remaining junior bondholders, Noonan said in a statement today. He didn’t give any terms of the buyback.

“They’re clearly trying to spook the market with a view to push bond prices lower so that they can get a decent take-up for any voluntary offer,” said Jim Ryan, director at Dublin-based Glas Securities. “The statement is suitably vague.”

Work is also underway to ensure “appropriate burden sharing” for subordinated bondholders of Bank of Ireland Plc and Irish Life & Permanent Plc, with “a further statement on this in the coming weeks,” Noonan said.

He reiterated that the government doesn’t plan to enforce losses on senior bondholders of Allied Irish, Bank of Ireland, EBS Building Society and Irish Life, the country’s so-called viable lenders.

Some other European bonds declined as well:

Greek and Portuguese bonds led a slump in the securities of Europe’s most indebted nations amid mounting investor concern that some may be forced to restructure their debts.

The declines pushed the yields on Greek and Portuguese 10- year bonds to euro-era records after German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said that Greece may need to renegotiate its debt burden if an audit in June questions its ability to pay creditors. Standard & Poor’s head of European sovereign ratings, Moritz Kraemer, said the risk of such an event has risen. Greek two-year yields climbed the most since January 27.

The yield on 10-year Greek debt jumped 36 basis points to 13.27 percent as of 4:38 p.m. in London, the highest since at least 1998 when Bloomberg began collecting the data. The two- year note yield surged as much as 103 basis points to 17.96 percent.

Portuguese 10-year yields added 14 basis points to 8.88 percent, after reaching 8.89 percent, the most since at least 1997. Two-year note yields were 26 basis points higher at 9.31 percent.

Schaeuble told Germany’s Die Welt newspaper that Greece may have to restructure because creditors can’t be forced to take losses until Europe’s permanent rescue system for the euro starts up in mid-2013.

The US Senate has been astonished to learn that financial markets are not a cooperative game.

The IMF has released the April 2011 Global Financial Stability Report.

A British court has ruled “kettling” illegal:

The kettling of G20 protesters in London was illegal, a British High Court has ruled in a case with sweeping implications in Toronto.

The decision Thursday by the Queen’s Bench justices said police were working “in good faith” but still overreacted when they corralled 4,500 people inside a Climate Camp in London for three hours on April 1, 2009.

“The police may only take such preventive action as a last resort catering for situations about to descend into violence,” the Queen’s Bench justices.

“The test of necessity is met only in truly extreme and exceptional cases.”

For the life of me, I don’t understand why this method of detention without cause wasn’t understood to be illegal from the beginning, but better late than never.

The Canadian preferred share market was mostly down today, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 18bp, FixedResets gaining 4bp and DeemedRetractibles off 14bp. Volatility picked up a little with four entries in the Performance Highlights table. Volume was anemic.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0119 % 2,409.2
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0119 % 3,623.4
Floater 2.50 % 2.27 % 39,540 21.56 4 0.0119 % 2,601.3
OpRet 4.91 % 3.12 % 55,374 2.09 8 0.1205 % 2,414.6
SplitShare 5.20 % -1.52 % 104,926 0.66 6 0.1737 % 2,494.9
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.1205 % 2,208.0
Perpetual-Premium 5.79 % 5.61 % 123,989 6.15 8 0.0646 % 2,050.6
Perpetual-Discount 5.60 % 5.66 % 131,770 14.38 16 -0.1812 % 2,115.0
FixedReset 5.16 % 3.46 % 201,735 2.94 57 0.0411 % 2,292.1
Deemed-Retractible 5.27 % 5.23 % 299,960 8.17 53 -0.1429 % 2,078.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -2.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-14
Maturity Price : 22.83
Evaluated at bid price : 23.02
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-14
Maturity Price : 22.63
Evaluated at bid price : 22.80
Bid-YTW : 5.10 %
IAG.PR.E Deemed-Retractible 1.22 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.73
Bid-YTW : 5.61 %
ELF.PR.G Deemed-Retractible 1.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.31
Bid-YTW : 7.33 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
NA.PR.M Deemed-Retractible 30,000 RBC bought two blocks from Nesbitt: 14,000 at 25.91 and 14,100 at 25.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-06-14
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.85
Bid-YTW : 5.29 %
TD.PR.O Deemed-Retractible 21,992 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 5.05 %
MFC.PR.A OpRet 19,980 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2015-12-18
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.76
Bid-YTW : 3.47 %
BNS.PR.M Deemed-Retractible 19,410 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.85
Bid-YTW : 5.06 %
TD.PR.G FixedReset 18,355 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.15
Bid-YTW : 3.33 %
BMO.PR.J Deemed-Retractible 17,576 YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.09
Bid-YTW : 5.04 %
There were 16 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount Quote: 23.02 – 23.65
Spot Rate : 0.6300
Average : 0.3712

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-14
Maturity Price : 22.83
Evaluated at bid price : 23.02
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %

TCA.PR.Y Perpetual-Discount Quote: 50.05 – 50.39
Spot Rate : 0.3400
Average : 0.2094

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-04-04
Maturity Price : 50.00
Evaluated at bid price : 50.05
Bid-YTW : 5.49 %

FTS.PR.E OpRet Quote: 26.80 – 27.07
Spot Rate : 0.2700
Average : 0.1817

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.75
Evaluated at bid price : 26.80
Bid-YTW : 3.12 %

TCA.PR.X Perpetual-Discount Quote: 50.07 – 50.34
Spot Rate : 0.2700
Average : 0.1868

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-11-14
Maturity Price : 50.00
Evaluated at bid price : 50.07
Bid-YTW : 5.47 %

RY.PR.G Deemed-Retractible Quote: 23.66 – 23.90
Spot Rate : 0.2400
Average : 0.1650

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.66
Bid-YTW : 5.26 %

RY.PR.R FixedReset Quote: 27.30 – 27.52
Spot Rate : 0.2200
Average : 0.1452

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.30
Bid-YTW : 3.36 %

April 13, 2011

April 13th, 2011

The Bank of Canada has released the April 2011 Monetary Policy Report:

The Bank expects core inflation to rise gradually to 2 per cent as excess supply in the economy is slowly absorbed and inflation expectations remain well anchored (Table 3 and Chart 32). As in January, this increase reflects the unwinding of the transitory influences currently dampening core inflation, including the effects of HST-related tax refunds passed on by businesses. The combination of ongoing modest growth in labour compensation and higher productivity is expected to continue to dampen inflationary pressures, with the higher assumed value of the Canadian dollar providing further restraint.

Although core inflation has been slightly weaker than expected in recent months, it is projected to converge to 2 per cent somewhat more quickly than in the January Report. This reflects the slightly smaller degree of slack in the Canadian economy over the projection horizon, as well as the sharp increases in the prices of agricultural commodities observed in recent months, which are expected to lead to a somewhat larger increase in food prices than had been expected.

DBRS has published its Quarterly SplitShare Market Report:

DBRS has today published its quarterly surveillance report covering the Canadian split share market for Q1 2011. The report provides insight into recent market activity and summarizes the performance of split share funds rated by DBRS. Three main areas are covered in the report: equity performance, existing fund activity and new fund market activity. The appendix provides details on all of the preferred shares and securities rated by DBRS, including current ratings and recent downside protection levels.

A copy of this commentary is available by contacting us at info@dbrs.com

The TMX / LSE deal looks more likely:

The architects of a deal between TMX Group Inc. (X-T39.68-0.16-0.40%) and the London Stock Exchange Group PLC have cleared a major hurdle by winning the backing of an all-party committee of MPPs at the Ontario legislature.

The committee does not have the power to approve or reject the contentious, multi-billion-dollar transaction. However, the committee is throwing its support behind the deal, according to Queen’s Park sources close to the situation, adding a powerful voice in a proposed merger that has been intensely debated in the business community.

Alpha ATS has had its IntraSpread dark orders approved:

Alpha’s IntraSpread will create a third market place, catering only to ‘dark orders’ that hide trade prices and quantities. So if RBC has a big order and doesn’t want anyone to know how much it’s trying to sell, it can enter a dark order. At the moment TMX allows sellers to do the same, but they have to be executed in the ‘lit’ or public market place.

In Alpha’s case, the buying order is completely dark as well. That scares some people. But what got it past the OSC this go around, is that only retail buyers can scoop these dark orders up. Alpha argues that means small orders will finally take priority over the big institutional buyers that have to stay in the other two market places.

Some emerging markets want more control over the World Bank & IMF:

The management structure of the institutions needs to reflect changes in the world economy, the draft statement by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa says, according to the diplomats, who asked not to be identified because the final text isn’t public. The section calls for a bigger role for developing countries in global institutions, a reference to concerns with how leaders are chosen at the World Bank and IMF.

For the life of me, I don’t understand why this needs to be discussed. You want more influence? Pony up more money. You’ve ponied up the money but still don’t have influence? Open your own store. Why is this complicated?

Is anybody else having trouble on the internet lately? When I open the Globe & Bloomberg pages linked above, for instance, my system basically freezes … I think my (IE) browser is executing about 40-bazillion JavaScript applets. How can I test this? I don’t look at dealbreaker.com any more, because by the time a page finally loads, I’ve read the story in the next day’s newspaper.

According to Load Impact, the G&M page has 59 resources and takes 15.06 seconds to load. PrefBlog takes 5.94 seconds with 86 resources (mostly the little green boxes on the right-hand panel). I don’t believe the results, though, because I just checked again and AFTER FIVE MINUTES (literally!) the G&M page is still chewing up all the capacity of one of my dual-processors and is still indicating it’s getting resources.

Update:: I’ve turned off “Compatibility View” for Bloomberg & G&M; things are much better now.

It was a quiet day with a downish bent in the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts down 7bp, FixedResets off 3bp and DeemedRetractibles gaining 2bp. Practically no volatility, only one entry in the Performance Highlights table. Volume was average.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.60%, equivalent to 7.28% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.3x. Long Corporates yield about 5.6% (maybe a little more) so the pre-tax interest equivalent spread (also called the Seniority Spread) is now about 170bp, a reversal of the sharp tightening reported on April 6.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0238 % 2,408.9
FixedFloater 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0238 % 3,623.0
Floater 2.50 % 2.27 % 40,995 21.56 4 0.0238 % 2,601.0
OpRet 4.92 % 3.43 % 56,034 2.09 8 0.0917 % 2,411.7
SplitShare 5.21 % -1.65 % 109,243 0.66 6 -0.0583 % 2,490.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0917 % 2,205.3
Perpetual-Premium 5.80 % 5.60 % 123,928 6.15 8 -0.0398 % 2,049.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.59 % 5.60 % 131,597 14.40 16 -0.0746 % 2,118.8
FixedReset 5.17 % 3.47 % 205,525 2.94 57 -0.0312 % 2,291.2
Deemed-Retractible 5.26 % 5.19 % 313,397 8.18 53 0.0212 % 2,081.2
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
ELF.PR.G Deemed-Retractible -1.38 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 20.04
Bid-YTW : 7.50 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
BMO.PR.Q FixedReset 104,448 TD crossed 35,000 at 24.90; Nesbitt bought 20,000 from anonymous at the same price; anonymous crossed (?) 10,600 at the same price again; Desjardins crossed 10,000, again at 24.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.93
Bid-YTW : 4.00 %
RY.PR.A Deemed-Retractible 65,524 RBC crossed 30,000 at 23.87; Nesbitt crossed 20,000 at 23.95.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 23.90
Bid-YTW : 5.09 %
BMO.PR.K Deemed-Retractible 55,963 Desjardins crossed two blocks of 25,000 each, both at 25.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2016-12-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.17
Bid-YTW : 5.29 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset 55,593 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 24.50.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 4.14 %
TD.PR.O Deemed-Retractible 51,348 Scotia crossed 20,000 at 24.60.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.53
Bid-YTW : 5.08 %
RY.PR.B Deemed-Retractible 41,432 Nesbitt crossed 24,000 at 24.49.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.40
Bid-YTW : 5.10 %
There were 32 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Wide Spread Highlights
Issue Index Quote Data and Yield Notes
IAG.PR.E Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.42 – 25.90
Spot Rate : 0.4800
Average : 0.2891

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.42
Bid-YTW : 5.80 %

IAG.PR.A Deemed-Retractible Quote: 22.10 – 22.54
Spot Rate : 0.4400
Average : 0.2655

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2022-01-31
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.10
Bid-YTW : 6.14 %

GWO.PR.M Deemed-Retractible Quote: 25.21 – 25.63
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.2589

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2019-04-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.21
Bid-YTW : 5.74 %

TD.PR.K FixedReset Quote: 27.21 – 27.58
Spot Rate : 0.3700
Average : 0.2343

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.21
Bid-YTW : 3.40 %

RY.PR.N FixedReset Quote: 27.17 – 27.63
Spot Rate : 0.4600
Average : 0.3342

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.17
Bid-YTW : 3.45 %

CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Quote: 22.57 – 22.99
Spot Rate : 0.4200
Average : 0.3257

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2041-04-13
Maturity Price : 22.42
Evaluated at bid price : 22.57
Bid-YTW : 5.16 %