Issue Comments

XCM.PR.A: Last Day to Vote on Reorganization

Commerce Split Corp has announced:

the deadline for voting on the proposed reorganization is February 3, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.

The purpose of the meeting, as previously disclosed, is to provide both Priority Equity and Class A shareholders with two choices. Effectively, there would be two investment options within the Company, each of which will be considered a separate investment fund.

The first Fund (Original Commerce Split) would function in much the same way as the Company now functions. There would continue to be two classes of shares related to this Fund: Priority Equity shares and Class A shares. The portfolio assets of the Fund would consist largely of cash and permitted repayment securities, and there would be limited exposure to the common shares of CIBC. There would continue to be a Priority Equity Portfolio Protection Plan in respect of this Fund.

The second Fund (New Commerce Split) would not have a Priority Equity Protection Plan associated with it, but rather would hold only shares of CIBC, to provide full exposure to a potential recovery in the value of CIBC common shares. The increased exposure to such common shares would create higher dividend income (assuming no changes to current dividends paid on the CIBC common shares) and the potential for much higher levels of income through the covered call writing program. In summary, under this option, Priority Equity Shares would receive the following securities for each Priority Equity share held: (i) one new $5 Class I Preferred share to yield 7.5% per annum; (ii) one Class II Preferred share with a notional value of $5 with distributions to yield 7.5% per annum on the $5 notional issue price to commence if and when the net asset value per unit of the New Commerce Split exceeds $12.50; and (iii) one half warrant. One full warrant can be exercised to purchase one Unit (consisting of one Class I Preferred share, one Class II Preferred share and one Capital share) for $10.00 at specified times for a period of two years after the closing date of the reorganization, if approved. Class A shares would receive one Capital share which would continue to participate in any net asset value growth over $10.00 per unit and dividends would only be reinstated if and when the net asset value per Unit exceeds $15.00.

Therefore, the special resolution, if passed, will effectively offer all shareholders a choice of the status quo through the Original Commerce Split or participating in a new fund through New Commerce Split that potentially could offer increased distribution and capital growth potential. The Company believes providing this choice is in the best interests of all shareholders in light of the unprecedented and severe decline in CIBC shares and the fact that there is still 6 years remaining until the maturity date of the Company.

We encourage all shareholders who have not yet voted, to vote by the February 3, 2009 deadline.

As discussed at the time of announcement, I recommend … VOTE NO!:

The preferred shareholders – currently holding a perfectly good fixed-income portfolio – are being asked to provide all the funding for the new company, taking all the downside risk of the portfolio holdings and giving away, free, gratis and for nothing an option on a big chunk of the upside. VOTE NO!

Issue Comments

XMF.PR.A: Last Day to Vote on Reorganization

M-Split Corporation has announced:

Last Day to Vote on Proposed Reorganization
TORONTO, ONTARIO – February 2, 2009 / Marketwire: M Split Corp (the “Company”) announces the deadline for voting on the proposed reorganization is February 3, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.

The purpose of the meeting, as previously disclosed, is to provide both Priority Equity and Class A shareholders with two choices. Effectively, there would be two investment options within the Company, each of which will be considered a separate investment fund.

The first Fund (Original M Split) would function in much the same way as the Company now functions. There would continue to be two classes of shares related to this Fund: Priority Equity shares and Class A shares. The portfolio assets of the Fund would consist largely of cash and permitted repayment securities, and there would be limited exposure to the common shares of Manulife. There would continue to be a Priority Equity Portfolio Protection Plan in respect of this Fund.

The second Fund (New M Split) would not have a Priority Equity Protection Plan associated with it, but rather would hold only shares of Manulife, to provide full exposure to a potential recovery in the value of Manulife common shares. The increased exposure to such common shares would create higher dividend income (assuming no changes to current dividends paid on the Manulife common shares) and the potential for much higher levels of income through the covered call writing program. In summary, under this option, Priority Equity Shares would receive the following securities for each Priority Equity share held: (i) one new $5 Class I Preferred share to yield 7.5% per annum; (ii) one Class II Preferred share with a notional value of $5 with distributions to yield 7.5% per annum on the $5 notional issue price to commence if and when the net asset value per unit of the New M Split exceeds $12.50; and (iii) one half warrant. One full warrant can be exercised to purchase one Unit (consisting of one Class I Preferred share, one Class II Preferred share and one Capital share) for $10.00 at specified times for a period of two years after the closing date of the reorganization, if approved. Class A shares would receive one Capital share which would continue to participate in any net asset value growth over $10.00 per unit and dividends would only be reinstated if and when the net asset value per Unit exceeds $15.00.

Therefore, the special resolution, if passed, will effectively offer all shareholders a choice of the status quo through the Original M Split or participating in a new fund through New M Split that potentially could offer increased distribution and capital growth potential. The Company believes providing this choice is in the best interests of all shareholders in light of the unprecedented and severe decline in Manulife shares and the fact that there is still 6 years remaining until the maturity date of the Company.

We encourage all shareholders who have not yet voted, to vote by the February 3, 2009 deadline.

For further information please contact Investor Relations at 416-304-4443, toll free at 1-877-4-Quadra (1-877-478-2372), or visit www.M-Split.com.

As previously discussed, I have recommended … VOTE NO!:

The preferred shareholders – currently holding a perfectly good fixed-income portfolio – are being asked to provide all the funding for the new company, taking all the downside risk of the portfolio holdings and giving away, free, gratis and for nothing an option on a big chunk of the upside. VOTE NO!

Issue Comments

PFD.PR.A Completes Merger into Mutual Fund

JovFunds Management has announced:

that the exchange of preferred shares of Charterhouse Preferred Share Index Corporation (the “Corporation”) for Class A units of Jov Leon Frazer Preferred Equity Fund (the “Merger”) was completed at the close of business on January 30, 2009. Preferred shareholders of the Corporation will receive 1.70389 units of the Class A units of the Fund for each preferred share of the Corporation held as at January 30, 2009. In connection with the Merger, the Corporation was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange on January 23, 2009. Units of the Fund are valued daily and may be transacted via the FundSERV Network beginning today.

Please refer to the Fund’s Simplified Prospectus at www.sedar.com for information on the Fund. For more information about the Merger, or for a copy of the Simplified Prospectus of the Fund, please call 1-866-514-6603 or visit us at www.JovFunds.com.

DBRS has announced that it:

has today discontinued the rating on the Preferred Shares issued by Charterhouse Preferred Share Index Corp. (the Company). On October 31, 2008, JovFunds Management Inc. announced that the Preferred Shareholders of the Company approved a special resolution to merge the Company into a newly formed open-ended mutual fund trust. The securities of the Company were de-listed from the Toronto Stock Exchange on January 23, 2009, and the merger was executed on January 30, 2009.

This completes the previously discussed timetable. JovFunds and Leon Frazer are both owned by Jovian Capital.

Index Construction / Reporting

HIMIPref™ Index Rebalancing: January 2009

HIMI Index Changes, January 30, 2009
Issue From To Because
BCE.PR.S Ratchet Scraps Volume
BAM.PR.G FixFloat Scraps Volume
FAL.PR.B Scraps Ratchet Volume

The relegation of BCE.PR.S and BAM.PR.G reverses changes made at December month-end.

The addition of FAL.PR.B to the Ratchet index is highly annoying: the outstanding call for redemption has boosted its price considerably.

There were the following intra-month changes:

HIMI Index Changes during January 2009
Issue Action Index Because
RY.PR.P Add FixedReset New Issue
NA.PR.O Add FixedReset New Issue
TD.PR.E Add FixedReset New Issue
BNS.PR.T Add FixedReset New Issue
RY.PR.R Add FixedReset New Issue
NA.PR.P Add FixedReset New Issue
TD.PR.G Add FixedReset New Issue
BNS.PR.X Add FixedReset New Issue
Miscellaneous News

The 'risk' of Preferred Shares

Geez, I hate it when the Financial Post gets desperate for copy. They consult their Journalists’ Handbook, and see that if somebody says “white is white”, it’s an interesting angle to dig up somebody who’ll say “white is black”.

They did it last year and now they’ve done it again: a short piece titled The ‘risk’ of Preferred Shares, by John Greenwood, pointing out that dividends are not guaranteed.

You can almost hear the journalist’s leading questions, which are not reported:

What would happen if a bank were to skip a payment on its preferred dividend?

If a bank were to skip one, the market for the shares would “be vaporized,” said Blackmont Capital analyst Brad Smith.

How many banks would have to skip payments before the market was adversely affected?

“All that would have to happen would be for one bank to miss a payment and the whole market would shut down,” said another analyst who asked not to be named.

Particularly irksome is:

Some European banks have been forced to cut back on dividends after accepting government bailouts.

Can he name any? I’m sure there have been some preferred defaults, but I can’t remember seeing anything about government money being conditional on a preferred dividend cut. Common dividend cuts, sure, that has happened in the States too … let’s just say I want more details.

If he wants to talk about preferred share defaults, he can look at Nortel & Quebecor World right here in Canada!

The only saving grace is:

Preferred shares rank senior to common, so even if the dividend on the common is sacrificed, holders of preferred shares could still collect. According to Sherry Cooper, senior economist at BMO Nesbitt Burns, aside from National Bank, none of the major banks has cut a dividend since the Great Depression. (National chopped twice, most recently in the early 1990s.)

… but still, I find the article annoying in the extreme. Particularly since I don’t understand why the word “risk” in the title is in quotes!

Yes, preferred shares can have their dividend cut. We know that. But if somebody’s going to talk about it in the newspaper, can we PLEASE have some kind of indication of how likely they think that might be? As for myself, I consider the probability immeasurably small for Canadian banks right now …the banks are well capitalized and profitable … anything imminent would be in the nature of a black swan event, immeasurable by definition.

Let the banks here get into trouble and sure, I’ll be happy – eager! – to start taking a view on the chances of them getting into more trouble. But could we at least wait to see some actual signs of definite trouble before discussing the effects on the market of a skipped payment?

I mean, geez, what’s next? A banner headline announcing that a giant asteroid smashing into earth could ruin our whole day?

Issue Comments

Best & Worst Performers: January 2009

These are total returns, with dividends presumed to have been reinvested at the bid price on the ex-date. The list has been restricted to issues in the HIMIPref™ indices.

January 2009
Issue Index DBRS Rating Monthly Performance Notes (“Now” means “January 30”)
BAM.PR.B Floater Pfd-2(low) -18.31% Up ‘n’ down, up ‘n’ down … this was the best performer in December, second-worst in November.
BAM.PR.K Floater Pfd-2(low) -16.46% Ditto, basically … worst in November, third-best in December.
IAG.PR.C FixedReset Pfd-2(high) -9.18% The underwriters had a sell-off party … and nobody came.
SBC.PR.A SplitShare Pfd-2 -8.55% Asset coverage of 1.4-:1 as of January 29, according to Brompton Group. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 12.43% based on a bid of 7.91 and a hardMaturity 2012-11-30 at 10.00.
TD.PR.C FixedReset Pfd-1 -7.16%  
PWF.PR.I PerpetualDiscount Pfd-1(low) +17.68% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.78% based on a bid of 22.26 and a limitMaturity.
W.PR.J PerpetualDiscount Pfd-2(low) +17.74% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.27% based on a bid of 19.51 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.N PerpetualDiscount Pfd-2(low) +18.06% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.87% based on a bid of 12.29 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount Pfd-2(low) +20.49% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 9.87% based on a bid of 12.29 and a limitMaturity.
BNA.PR.C SplitShare Pfd-2(low) +28.57% Asset coverage of 1.8+:1 as of December 31, according to the company – presumably a little better now, since the underlying BAM.A has improved. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 15.65% based on a bid of 11.25 and a hardMaturity 2019-1-10 at 25.00.
Market Action

January 30, 2009

I’m very annoyed with DBRS. I had been hoping they would come to some resolution of their mass reviews of Split Corporations (two of them: October and December), but here we are at month-end and … nothing.

So we’ll go through February with, for instance, FBS.PR.B sporting an asset coverage just a hair over 1.0:1 and still rated Pfd-2(low). As a portfolio manager, of course, I couldn’t be happier – such a grossly mis-rated issue in the universe increases my chance to outperform – but as an index calculator, it’s very annoying. It will be in the Split-Share sub-index for at least another month.

The concept of incentive is under continued attack:

NYSE Euronext Chief Executive Officer Duncan Niederauer said today in Davos that “some compensation models need to be completely overhauled.” He added that this would be difficult to legislate and companies will have to take the lead.

“While a number of people clearly do create wealth by brain power, by use of the company’s balance sheet and by other resources, other people have been receiving incentives for basically turning up,” Barclays Plc Chairman Marcus Agius said at the World Economic Forum. “That I don’t think is very smart. An incentive system properly designed and fairly calibrated is absolutely fundamental.”

Interesting charge/countercharge in the Money Market Fund world:

James “Jes” Staley, head of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s investment unit, said the $4 trillion money-market fund industry is the “greatest systemic risk” to the financial system that hasn’t been adequately addressed.

JPMorgan’s Staley blamed money funds for Lehman’s collapse and the near bankruptcy of Bear Stearns Cos. last year. The funds, which typically hold highly rated, short-term debt instruments, were forced to pull their money from the firms when they saw signs of trouble, he said.

“The people who brought down Lehman and almost Bear Stearns weren’t the banks, they were the money funds,” Staley said.

David Glocke, head of taxable money-market investments at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania-based Vanguard Group defended the industry.

“I’m aware there are those who want to blame the money- market industry for taking away the punch bowl,” he said. “But issuers need to maintain diverse sources of funding.”

The G-30 report on MMFs has been discussed on PrefBlog. The interesting thing about Mr. Glocke’s remark is that – taken at face value – it appears to accept that MMFs are a portfolio management monoculture; it would be highly surprising is the same thing were to be said, for instance, about an equity issue … but, of course, equities only go down due to short selling, so the short-seller can get one of them bonus thingies, right?

PerpetualDiscounts closed the month with a marginal loss, closing to yield 6.85%, equivalent to 9.59% at the standard 1.4x equivalency factor. Long corporates now yield about 7.6%, so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread is now at about 200bp.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 6.81 % 7.58 % 21,648 13.63 2 0.3929 % 851.8
FixedFloater 7.47 % 6.96 % 158,550 13.86 8 -0.7003 % 1,384.7
Floater 5.57 % 4.75 % 32,615 15.98 4 -4.1413 % 944.4
OpRet 5.31 % 4.92 % 163,621 4.03 15 0.0279 % 2,023.7
SplitShare 6.23 % 9.05 % 76,364 4.10 15 -0.7373 % 1,789.8
Interest-Bearing 7.06 % 8.21 % 35,974 0.88 2 0.4049 % 2,004.7
Perpetual-Premium 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.0185 % 1,559.9
Perpetual-Discount 6.87 % 6.85 % 223,347 12.72 71 -0.0185 % 1,436.7
FixedReset 6.10 % 5.44 % 761,417 14.33 26 0.2212 % 1,789.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
PWF.PR.A Floater -7.91 % Five hundred shares trading in the last 15 minutes took out the bid and the closing quote was 11.06-14.98 (!) 1×1, trading a total of 4,910 shares in a range of 11.06-12.06.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 11.06
Evaluated at bid price : 11.06
Bid-YTW : 4.75 %
BAM.PR.B Floater -5.03 % Closed at 7.36-79, 3×9 after trading 10,221 shares in a range of 7.75-79. YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 7.36
Evaluated at bid price : 7.36
Bid-YTW : 7.24 %
DF.PR.A SplitShare -3.72 % Asset coverage of 1.4-:1 as of January 15, according to the company.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2014-12-01
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 8.79
Bid-YTW : 7.94 %
BAM.PR.K Floater -3.69 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 7.56
Evaluated at bid price : 7.56
Bid-YTW : 7.05 %
BNS.PR.K Perpetual-Discount -3.57 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 18.36
Evaluated at bid price : 18.36
Bid-YTW : 6.59 %
LFE.PR.A SplitShare -3.19 % Asset coverage of 1.5-:1 as of January 15 according to the company.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2012-12-01
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 9.11
Bid-YTW : 8.04 %
PPL.PR.A SplitShare -2.75 % Asset coverage of 1.4+:1 as of January 15 according to the company.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2012-12-01
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 8.85
Bid-YTW : 8.56 %
BCE.PR.A FixedFloater -2.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 16.48
Bid-YTW : 6.72 %
RY.PR.H Perpetual-Discount -2.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 21.00
Evaluated at bid price : 21.00
Bid-YTW : 6.75 %
PWF.PR.L Perpetual-Discount -2.04 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 17.74
Evaluated at bid price : 17.74
Bid-YTW : 7.25 %
BCE.PR.G FixedFloater -1.87 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 15.21
Bid-YTW : 7.14 %
GWO.PR.G Perpetual-Discount -1.61 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 18.31
Evaluated at bid price : 18.31
Bid-YTW : 7.21 %
BCE.PR.R FixedFloater -1.52 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 15.51
Bid-YTW : 6.96 %
RY.PR.C Perpetual-Discount -1.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 17.65
Evaluated at bid price : 17.65
Bid-YTW : 6.54 %
BAM.PR.J OpRet -1.01 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2018-03-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 17.60
Bid-YTW : 10.70 %
PWF.PR.I Perpetual-Discount 1.18 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 21.92
Evaluated at bid price : 22.26
Bid-YTW : 6.78 %
POW.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 1.20 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 21.02
Evaluated at bid price : 21.02
Bid-YTW : 6.74 %
FIG.PR.A Interest-Bearing 1.21 % Asset coverage of 1.1-:1 as of January 19, based on Capital Units NAV of 1.46 as of January 29 and 0.53 Capital Units per preferred.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Hard Maturity
Maturity Date : 2014-12-31
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 7.52
Bid-YTW : 12.53 %
SLF.PR.D Perpetual-Discount 1.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 15.58
Evaluated at bid price : 15.58
Bid-YTW : 7.25 %
PWF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount 1.35 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 20.25
Evaluated at bid price : 20.25
Bid-YTW : 6.85 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater 1.43 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 11.31
Bid-YTW : 9.63 %
MFC.PR.C Perpetual-Discount 1.62 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 16.96
Evaluated at bid price : 16.96
Bid-YTW : 6.75 %
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 2.59 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 21.71
Evaluated at bid price : 21.75
Bid-YTW : 4.49 %
TD.PR.Y FixedReset 3.30 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 22.17
Evaluated at bid price : 22.21
Bid-YTW : 4.41 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TD.PR.G FixedReset 611,420 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 24.80
Evaluated at bid price : 24.85
Bid-YTW : 6.30 %
BNS.PR.X FixedReset 496,219 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 24.85
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 6.34 %
RY.PR.R FixedReset 214,946 New issue settled yesterday.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 24.96
Bid-YTW : 6.34 %
NA.PR.P FixedReset 172,668 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 24.86
Evaluated at bid price : 24.91
Bid-YTW : 6.68 %
TD.PR.N OpRet 120,800 Scotia crossed 120,000 at 25.65.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Soft Maturity
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.61
Bid-YTW : 4.08 %
BNS.PR.T FixedReset 94,731 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2039-01-30
Maturity Price : 24.75
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 6.15 %
There were 32 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Issue Comments

BNS.PR.X Closes Below Par on Good Volume

Scotia has announced:

that it has completed the domestic offering of 11 million, non-cumulative 5-year rate reset preferred shares Series 28 (the “Preferred Shares Series 28”) at a price of $25.00 per share. The gross proceeds of the offering were $275 million.

The issue is a fixed-reset 6.25%+446, as previously announced. The original size was 10-million shares plus a 2-million greenshoe; bumped to 12+2; and they sold 13. A fine marketting job!

The issue traded 496,219 shares in a range of 24.80-00, closing at 24.90-92. It was one of three issues settling today, the others being TD.PR.G and NA.PR.P.

The issue has been added to the HIMIPref™ Fixed-Reset Sub-Index.

Issue Comments

TD.PR.G Closes Below Par on Good Volume

The new TD bank fixed-reset 6.25%+438 previously discussed settled today.

The original announcement was for an issue size of 8-million shares with a 3-million greenshoe; TD later announced that the greenshoe had been fully exercised and the issue size bumped, with a total of 15-million shares sold. Now that’s a selling job!

The issue traded 611,420 shares in a range of 24.80-97 before closing at 24.85-90.

The issue has been added to the HIMIPref™ Fixed-Reset Sub-Index.

Issue Comments

NA.PR.P Settles Below Par on OK Volume

National has announced:

that it has completed the public offering of non-cumulative 5-year rate reset first preferred shares series 26 (the “Series 26 Preferred Shares”), at a price of $25.00 per share. The offering was made through a syndicate of underwriters led by National Bank Financial Inc. Prior to the closing of the offering, the underwriters agreed to purchase 1,800,000 additional Series 26 Preferred Shares through the underwriters’ option, bringing the total issue to 5,800,000 shares and gross proceeds of the offering to $145 million

As previously discussed, this issue is a fixed-reset 6.60%+479. It traded 172,668 shares in a range of 24.85-95 before closing at 24.91-95.

The issue has been added to the HIMIPref™ Fixed-Reset Sub-Index.