Deutsche Bank’s decision to skip an opportunity to redeem €1-billion of subordinated bonds at the first scheduled call date because replacing them would be more expensive has rattled the bond market. Some suggested the European investment bank’s move, which surprised both investors and experts, has transformed the subordinated debt market. They fear that other banks will follow, which could threaten their relationships with investors and trigger losses.
…
Deutsche Bank is the first major bank not to call a Lower Tier 2 issue, which rank just below senior bonds. The move has implications for the wider subordinated debt market was well as for extension risk of Tier 1 securities, Mr. Adamson. said.
I, for one, am very happy with this move. As I wrote in A Vale of Tiers:
Investors tend to trade sub-debt as if it will definitely mature on their step-up date – dealer quotations will often reflect a spread to a Canada bond maturing on the step-up date. However, while one may count on them being called, as expected in good times, this will not necessarily be the case in times of trouble. In times of trouble, three-month BAs + 100bp might look awfully skimpy! Investors should tread very carefully when purchasing debt of this nature.
For years, pseudo-managers have been able to outperform actual bonds simply by purchasing sub-debt and Innovative Tier 1 Capital, justifying these moves on the grounds that the tiered structures are included in the Scotia (now DEX) index. The largest corporate holding in XBB, for instance, is RBC Trust Subordinated Notes, with a pretend-maturity of 2012-4-30.
Sub-Debt has been discussed on PrefBlog, particularly in the posts Cracks Appear in European Sub-Debt Market and Banks and Subordinated Debt.
Update, 2024-9-6: There was quite an aftermath to this, as I was reminded when responding to an unrelated comment many years later.
There was material repricing of sub-debt globally:
Broader market implications from Deutsche Bank’s (DB) unexpected decision to extend €1-billion of its lower-Tier 2 debt beyond the first scheduled call date has forced RBC Capital Markets to downgrade its ranking on the subordinate debt of several of Canada’s largest financial companies.
The changes move Toronto-Dominon Bank (TD), Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Great-West Lifeco Inc.’s (GWLOF.PK) sub-debt ratings from “outperform” to “sector perform,” the same level as Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), CIBC (CM) and National Bank. RBC rates Bank of Montreal’s sub-debt at “underperform.”
Analyst Altaf Nanji told clients:
We believe Deutsche Bank’s decision to extend its LT2 debt beyond the short redemption date will have repercussions for all debt securities with a step feature – particularly older vintage securities with steps that are well out of the money.
While he expects that Canadian banks and lifecos will continue to redeem these securities on their short date, the same cannot be said for other markets and international developments could hurt all valuations.
“The decision caused material spread widening in the Canadian sub-debt market,” the analyst said, suggesting that Deutsche Bank may have opened up a Pandora’s Box.
… and a buyer’s strike was threatened:
Investors in bank debt are threatening to boycott lenders that follow Deutsche Bank in breaking an unwritten rule and failing to exercise a call option on subordinated debt.
In a co-ordinated action, angry bond investors are writing to bank treasurers and investor relations heads telling them that any failure to exercise a call option will be considered a breach of trust that could cause all the issuer’s debt to be shunned.
Deutsche stunned the debt market last week by choosing not to redeem €1bn (£932m) of subordinated lower tier 2 bonds because to do so was cheaper than refinancing. But though the move saved Germany’s biggest bank up to €150m, it caused fury among buyers of the debt who worked on the assumption that bonds would always be redeemed at their first call date.
The letter, seen by The Independent, said a bank’s decision not to call debt would be taken to mean “the institution is in such difficulty that it is an impossibility to call the instrument or the institution feels that it is in such a strong position that it can afford to alienate itself from the support of a wide portion of the fixed-income institutional investor community”.
Bank of China, a major buyer of bank debt, has gone further in its communication with issuers. The giant Chinese lender’s Hong Kong operation has told banks that “any non-call by a given institution will result in that institution’s debt (not just lower tier 2 but senior and tier 1 as well) being ineligible for future investment consideration”.
This is what the new BMO Capital Trust 10.22% notes are no?
[…] PrefBlog Canadian Preferred Shares – Data and Discussion « Deutsche Bank Ignores Sub-Debt Pretend-Maturity […]
This is what the new BMO Capital Trust 10.22% notes are no?
Close. The BMO Capital Trust II issue is Tier 1 capital, so it’s easier to suspend the income payments and it ranks junior to sub-debt.
In broad principle, however, you’re quite right. The BMO notes will trade with a pretend-maturity of 2013-12-31, with a step-up to 5-Year-Canadas +1050bp on that date.
Close. The BMO Capital Trust II issue is Tier 1 capital, so it’s easier to suspend the income payments and it ranks junior to sub-debt.
Are they considered Tier 1 because of the rule change? Does the same order apply? i.e. As with Boats, Bats, Cats, Trucs, you receive semi-annual interest payments ONLY if the preferred shareholders get theirs or do these get you in line ahead of preferreds?
Are they considered Tier 1 because of the rule change?
Yes. The 99-year maturity and the cumulative dividends allows them to be considered a bond (with tax deductible interest) by the tax man; prior to the rule change these features would have disallowed its inclusion in Tier 1.
As with Boats, Bats, Cats, Trucs, you receive semi-annual interest payments ONLY if the preferred shareholders get theirs or do these get you in line ahead of preferreds?
As far as I know, all the BOATS, BATS etc. are senior to preferreds.
From
http://www2.bmo.com/ar2006/downloads/bmo_ar06_note18.pdf
“Holders of the BOaTS are entitled to receive semi-annual non
cumulative fixed cash distributions as long as the Bank declares
dividends on its preferred shares, or if no such shares are outstand
ing, on its common shares in accordance with ordinary Bank
dividend practice.”
I don’t know but could one read this as subordinate to preferreds or on par with preferreds or, should theren’t be any preferreds equal to the common? It doesn’t seem to read to be senior to either?
From the BMO Capital Trust Prospectus dated September 29, 2000:
The Accumulated Unpaid Indicated Distribution (AUID) must be paid to the holder if the bank blocks conversion into Preferred Shares, which are soft-retractible:
If the BOaTS don’t get their distribution on any date, dividends on preferreds and common are stopped until after the next distribtion date. Thus, resumption of BOaTS distributions will occur prior to resumption of preferred dividends.
[…] Sub-Debt has been in the news lately, with Deutsche Bank’s refusal to execute a pretend-maturity, and I have dug up another theoretical paper: What does the Yield on Subordinated Bank Debt […]
[…] pretend-managers, very upset by Deutsche Bank’s refusal to execute an out-of-the-money call are very upset: Deutsche Bank AG’s decision to pass up an opportunity to redeem 1 billion euros […]
[…] Bank did the business-like thing and didn’t call their sub-debt on the pretend-maturity. The market ripped their faces off. Why? Because Joe at the brokerage had sold all that paper to […]
[…] discretion in a manner not guessed beforehand by the market can have severe consequences, as Deutsche Bank found out, as discussed on December 19, […]
[…] and hurt when he finds out that it isn’t. As evidence, I can cite what happened when Deutsche Bank refused to honour its sub-debt pretend-maturity. Conversion – or the prospect of conversion – will in such a case exacerbate the panic. […]