Issue Comments

EPE.PR.A to be redeemed

EPCOR Preferred Equity has announced (and its parent, EPCOR, has confirmed, in case anybody’s worried there’s a rogue treasurer on the loose):

its intention to redeem all of the outstanding Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series I (“the Preferred Shares”) on September 30, 2007 at a redemption price of $25.00 per Preferred Share. The Preferred Shares were issued to investors by EPCOR Preferred Equity Inc. on September 27, 2002.
    EPCOR will fund the redemption from cash balances and funds available under its revolving credit facilities.

Eight-million of these shares were outstanding, rated Pfd-2(low) by DBRS.

According to EPCOR, EPCOR Preferred Equity

was established for the purpose of raising equity capital, on a consolidated basis, for EPCOR Utilities Inc., its parent corporation. In turn, the capital is used to provide loan financing to other subsidiaries of EPCOR Utilities Inc.

This issue has not been included in the HIMIPref™ universe.

Update 2007-09-11: The headline previously referred to this issue as “EPE.PR.E”. This error has now been corrected.

Issue Comments

BCE / Teachers: A Review

BCE closed today on the TSX at $38.85 – down $0.25 after dipping as low as $37.55. This is way below the $42.75 takeover price – just over 9.1% below, in fact – so, given that the takeover is a matter of great pith and moment for preferred share investors, I thought I’d review what’s happened so far.

On June 30, I reported on the takeover and my puzzlement regarding the inclusion of the preferred shares in the offer. The Teachers press release trumpetted:

The purchaser has obtained a debt commitment to finance the transaction subject to usual terms for these types of financings.

It should be noted that the “Purchaser” is not Teachers, but a numbered company set up by it and its partners.

On July 17, the Great Sub-Prime Panic of ’07 got rolling in earnest:

Mind you, a little safety could be just what the doctor ordered down south! Bear Stearns has warned that the smaller of its two famous hedge funds is a total write-off, and the other one isn’t much better. Take this lesson to heart: just because a firm is good at selling investments doesn’t mean that they’re necessarily good at running investments.

On July 26, I had to admit:

I couldn’t resist checking the definitive BCE / Teachers’ Agreement

6.4(9): The Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that its obtaining financing is not a condition to any of its obligations hereunder, regardless of the reasons why financing is not obtained or whether such reasons are within or beyond the control of the Purchaser. For the avoidance of doubt, if any financing referred to in this Section 6.4 is not obtained, the Purchaser will continue to be obligated to consummate the Arrangement, subject to and on the terms contemplated by this Agreement.

On July 27 I reported that:

Citi Investment Research cut its recommendation, citing growing risks to its financing.

Later in that post, I speculated:

I’ve thought the issue in the context of what a massive break-fee-loss would mean to Teachers, and come to the conclusion that I don’t know enough about the issue. It would seem to me reasonable that there might be provisions regarding financing in the consortium agreement, to the effect that, if the deal fails on financing, the loss would be borne by Teachers financial partners, Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC. After all, they’re the financial muscle for the deal! It may be that such a provision is why Mr. Lamoureux is so sanguine … but we will just have to sit back and wait and see! In the meantime, I highly doubt that I’ll be throwing chips down on that table!

The plot thickened on July 31:

there are musings that the USD 37.2-billion takeover of TXU is at risk, with the suddenly nervous financiers tempted to pay a billion bucks to get out of the deal. Observant readers will not that both amounts are oddly reminiscent of the BCE / Teachers’ agreement, but the musings are rebutted on another news service. Trial balloon? Chatter from clerks? Who knows? There would be a big reputational hit to take

On August 2, BCE announced:

that all necessary filings have now been made for regulatory approval of the proposed acquisition of BCE by an investor group led by Teachers’ Private Capital, the private investment arm of the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC. These include filings with Industry Canada, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian Competition Bureau, the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission and six U.S. states.

On August 3, I reported: 

Speaking of Telus, they released their quarterlies today, and noted:

TELUS in July continued its assessment of whether it should potentially make a competing offer for BCE. TELUS has concluded this assessment and it does not intend to submit a competing offer to acquire BCE.

On August 8, BCE announced:

that a special shareholder meeting will be held on Friday, September 21, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. in Montreal. At the special meeting, holders of common and preferred shares registered at the close of business on August 10, 2007 will be asked to vote on the privatization of BCE by, among others, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board and affiliates of Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners, LLP.

Which brings us, basically, to today, with speculation on other buy-outs, the common 9.1% below the take-over price and a press release from Teachers:

In response to media inquires, officials at Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan and their partners Providence Equity Partners Inc. and Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, stated today that they remain committed to the terms of the definitive agreement reached on June 30, under which the investment partners would acquire BCE. The transaction is subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals.

The press release has been picked up by Reuters and Bloomberg. Bloomberg also reports that

  • Edward Jones & Co. has cut the BCE rating to “Sell” from “Hold”
  • An analyst at Three Macs said BCE “has definitely become higher risk than it was even two weeks ago because of the transaction risk,”
  • A National Bank Financial analyst said “I still think this deal has lower than average risk of breaking” and rates the shares “Sector Perform”

Bloomberg did not disclose long-term track records for any of these analysts.

What do I say? I say BCE Prefs are a crapshoot on credit. I don’t play craps with investment money.

BCE has the following preferred shares outstanding: BCE.PR.A, BCE.PR.C, BCE.PR.E, BCE.PR.F, BCE.PR.G, BCE.PR.H, BCE.PR.I, BCE.PR.R, BCE.PR.S, BCE.PR.T, BCE.PR.Y & BCE.PR.Z

PrefLetter

August PrefLetter Now in Preparation

The markets have closed and the August edition of PrefLetter is now being prepared.

PrefLetter is the monthly newsletter recommending individual issues of preferred shares to subscribers. There is at least one recommendation from every major type of preferred share; the recommendations are taylored for “buy-and-hold” investors.

The August version will be eMailed to clients and available for single-issue purchase with immediate delivery prior to the opening bell on Monday. I will write another post on the weekend advising when the August issue has been uploaded to the server … so watch this space carefully if you intend to order “Next Issue” or “Previous Issue”!

Market Action

August 9, 2007

The markets giveth and the markets taketh away.

The trouble started in Europe, when BNP Paribas halted redemptions on some hedge funds, due to an inability to find a bid on some of their holdings.

“The complete evaporation of liquidity in certain market segments of the U.S. securitization market has made it impossible to value certain assets fairly regardless of their quality or credit rating,” BNP Paribas said in a statement.

This caused panic – or, at least, a major recalculation of just how bad things actually are. Overnight LIBOR increased 53bp and the European Central Bank stepped up to flood the system with cash. There is, as yet, no word on whether they have started renting helicopters. Similarly, the Fed pumped in liquidity (albeit not so much) and the Bank of Canada proudly announced that its employees showed up for work today.

The stock market did not like being reminded of sub-prime and showed its displeasure in both the US and Canada. The market is so upset that it has been knocked back all the way to where it was on Monday at about 2pm:

As might be imagined, the bond markets did interesting things. The flood of short-term money from the central banks sent two-year Treasury yields sharply lower. Fears that this money might fuel inflation steepened the curve considerably, both in the US and Canada. It would be really, really nice to see a decent term premium again, y’know? The WSJ has a round-up of reactions to the liquidity pumping.

Thirty-day Fed-Fund Futures are now indicating a rate of 5.20% for August and 4.73% for next February, but it’s an open question about how reliable this predictor is. There’s a lot of arbitrage problems with this contract – it’s hard to short Treasury Bills – as well as segmentation problems.

In stories of continuing interest, Joseph Stiglitz blames the sub-prime mess on Greenspan & Bush and Brad Setser has some things to say about China’s Reserve Policy sabre-rattling.

The preferred share market saw increased volumes today – back to normal levels, perhaps even normal+, with three issues trading in excess of 100,000 shares without being internal crosses or dividend capture plays.

PerpetualDiscount managed to squeak out another daily gain, while perpetualPremiums fell a bit, but nothing too exciting.

In keeping with the “flight to quality” theme, a number of lower-rated issues not included in the indices performed poorly today: NTL.PR.G, -2.89%; HPF.PR.B, -1.71%; DC.PR.A, -1.66%; EPP.PR.A, -1.45%; NTL.PR.F, -1.16%; and our friend from yesterday, YPG.PR.B, -1.14%. I will note that DBRS rates HPF.PR.B as Pfd-2(low), but I don’t understand why.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.75% 4.78% 29,515 15.96 1 +0.0410% 1,045.0
Fixed-Floater 4.99% 4.98% 127,739 14.19 8 -0.1018% 1,020.9
Floater 4.88% 0.33% 74,315 8.18 4 -0.1992% 1,048.6
Op. Retract 4.82% 3.89% 83,087 2.95 16 +0.1512% 1,024.4
Split-Share 5.04% 4.64% 101,688 3.91 15 -0.0949% 1,045.9
Interest Bearing 6.25% 6.71% 64,530 4.62 3 -0.7418% 1,032.2
Perpetual-Premium 5.53% 5.18% 101,910 5.65 24 -0.0459% 1,024.2
Perpetual-Discount 5.07% 5.11% 309,389 15.32 39 +0.0278% 977.5
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing -1.7989% Very volatile lately! Asset coverage is down to 1.86:1 as of August 3, down from 1.97:1 on July 13. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.47% based on a bid of 9.28 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount -1.4151% So much for yesterday’s gains! Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.77% based on a bid of 20.90 and a limitMaturity.
WFS.PR.A SplitShare -1.0721% Probably the “World Financial” part of its name that did it! Had asset coverage of 2.13:1 as of July 31. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.02% based on a bid of 10.15 and a hardMaturity 2011-6-30 at 10.00.
PWF.PR.J OpRet +1.0074% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.93% based on a bid of 26.07 and either a call 2009-5-30 at 25.75 OR a softMaturity 2013-7-30 at 25.00. Take your pick. Anything in between will be pretty much the same as well.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
GWO.PR.X OpRet 262,683 Nesbitt crossed 200,000 at 26.85, then another 50,000 at the same price. Nice tickets! Assiduous readers will remember my fascination with this issue. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.68% based on a bid of 26.66 and a call 2009-10-30 at 26.00. Or a whopping 3.70% if it hangs on until its softMaturity 2013-9-29 at 25.00. That’s 5.15% interest equivalent. I suppose that’s OK, but you can get slightly over 5% on a bank deposit note for about the same term, and about 5.4% on GWL 10-year paper … so why give up seniority AND increase negative convexity? Some things in this life puzzle me.
TD.PR.N OpRet 103,400 Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 25.85. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.07% based on a bid of 25.81 and a softMaturity 2014-1-30 at 25.00.
TD.PR.M OpRet 102,500 The busy boys at Nesbitt crossed 100,000 at 26.11. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.91% based on a bid of 26.14 and a softMaturity 2013-10-30 at 25.00.
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 67,830 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 23.06. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.92% based on a bid of 23.00 and a limitMaturity.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 64,939 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.05% based on a bid of 22.56 and a limitMaturity.

There were twenty-six other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Market Action

August 8, 2007

OK, everybody, we can relax now! George W. Bush has stated “I’m not an economist, but my hope is that the market, if it functions normally, will be able to yield a soft landing. That’s kind of what it looks like so far.”  The equity markets immediately responded with a huge advances, both in the US and in Canada.

Sub-prime is old news, as evidenced by the fact that the IMF is pontifficating on the subject. The Europeans say investors can take their lumps anyway. Of far greater interest is rumblings from China that they may be willing, under certain circumstances, to flex their treasury muscle and use their currency reserves as a political weapon. Bush says that this would be foolhardy, and it’s therefore surprising that anybody is still taking the threat seriously. But … there is some concern the Fed doesn’t have the same influence over longer-term rates that it used to. Tom Graff has some comments and I have previously noted the effect of Chinese investment on Treasuries. Their trade surplus rose again in July, so they’ve got plenty of ammunition.

Treasuries got thumped, and whether that’s a rebound of the flight to quality or a China Syndrome is a matter of taste. Canadas followed Treasuries, unnoticed by media and bloggers.

The Wall Street Murdoch is Magnificent Journal posted an interesting comparison of credit markets, now vs. the LCTM blow-up. Given the state of economic education, however, nobody will notice.

It was a good day in pref-land, with volume picking up a bit and numerous “Scraps” issues (those not included in the indices due to either low volume or poor credit) gaining over 1% in price (bid / bid). The PerpetualDiscount index continued to shine and – who knows – might even make it back to its 2006-6-30 level of 1,000.00 before too long.

BAM had an interesting day, with two of its floating-rate issues and one of its perpetualDiscounts gaining over 1% (bid / bid). There seems to have been some pickup in activity in the BAM.PR.M / BAM.PR.N issues but whether this is meaningful remains to be seen. The fund has a position! An attractive yield, anyway – but I will confess I don’t know how many, if any, the underwriters of BAM.PR.N still have to unload. Certain the blow-out sale on EPP.PR.A I was told about has fizzled – the issue immediately started trading below the price I was told and has remained there since.

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.76% 4.79% 29,027 15.94 1 +0.7842% 1,044.6
Fixed-Floater 4.98% 5.00% 128,065 14.18 8 -0.1729% 1,022.0
Floater 4.87% 0.32% 72,172 8.22 4 +0.9444% 1,050.7
Op. Retract 4.83% 4.07% 81,890 3.43 16 -0.0089% 1,022.9
Split-Share 5.04% 4.58% 103,213 3.91 15 -0.0171% 1,046.9
Interest Bearing 6.20% 6.58% 62,625 4.65 3 +0.7230% 1,039.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.20% 102,727 5.65 24 +0.0182% 1,024.7
Perpetual-Discount 5.07% 5.11% 308,888 15.32 39 +0.1314% 977.3
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -1.0305%  
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount +1.0545% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.92% based on a bid of 23.00 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.B Floater +1.1438% Pays 70% of Canadian Prime; currently redeemable at $25.00; now bid at 24.76.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount +1.1933% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.68% based on a bid of 21.20 and a limitMaturity. The virtually identical BAM.PR.N issue is bid at 20.62 for a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.84, and its redemption period starts six months later.
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.6129% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.15% (as interest) based on a bid of 9.45 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00
BAM.PR.K Floater +2.6217% Pays 70% of Canada Prime, currently redeemable at 25.00, now bid at 24.66
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
BNS.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 94,840 National Bank crossed 70,000 at 23.00. Also a big price-mover – see above.
RY.PR.G PerpetualDiscount 56,060 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.98% based on a bid of 22.65 and a limitMaturity.
CM.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 31,230 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.10% based on a bid of 23.19 and a limitMaturity.
BNS.PR.L PerpetualDiscount 17,360 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.93% based on a bid of 22.95 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.M PerpetualDiscount 15,060 Also a big price-mover – see above.

There were sixteen other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Issue Comments

BCE.PR.A / BCE.PR.B : Fixed-Rate Dividend Set

BCE has announced:

BCE Inc. will, on September 1, 2007, continue to have Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AA (“Series AA Preferred Shares”) outstanding if holders of at least 2.5 million of its Series AA Preferred Shares elect not to convert such shares into Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred Shares, Series AB by August 22, 2007. In such a case, as of September 1, 2007, the Series AA Preferred Shares will pay, on a quarterly basis, as and when declared by the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., a fixed cash dividend of $0.300000 based on an annual dividend rate of 4.800% for the five-year period beginning on September 1, 2007.

As previously discussed, the Teachers’ bid includes cancellation of BCE.PR.A (the fixed rate) for $25.76 and of BCE.PR.B (the ratchet rate) for $25.50.

BCE.PR.B does not currently exist; according to the prospectus the initial rate will be 80% of prime, ratcheted. If we assume that two dividends will be paid prior to cancellation and that this rate increases at the maximum speed of 4% per month and that prime continues to be 6.25%, then we arrive at an average rate of 90% of prime, which is 5.625%, which is dividends per share of about $0.70.

Two dividends on the “A” at 4.80% will come to $0.60.

Thus, if one were absolutely sure that the Teachers bid will take be consumated as advertised, one would stick with the BCE.PR.A at 4.80%.

I’m not convinced, though. I think there is a significant chance that the bid will not be completed as currently envisaged and that the preferred shares will continue to exist in some form or another at a reduced credit rating. Should this come to pass, a ratcheting floater will almost certainly be much more valuable than a 4.80% fixed rate to be reset/exchange in 2012. Given that the potential reward for keeping the BCE.PR.A issue is so low – only sixteen cents per share, net – I believe that the risk/reward profile makes conversion to BCE.PR.B the path of prudence.

Others may disagree!

Market Action

August 7, 2007

It was a day of mixed indicators, with frenzied traders choosing random bits of data and making bets on them! US equities rose again, continuing a huge rise from yesterday while all sensible people were on holiday, on the very good rationale that the Fed says the economy is growing enough that the main risk is inflation. It therefore makes all kinds of sense that Canadian equities fell on fears that the US Economy is slowing, doesn’t it? Is the glass half-empty or half-full? I guess it depends how far away you are from the glass.

The US Treasury market did homage to the Fed statement as well, falling a bit – not much – as traders appeared to take the view that the expected rate cut will take longer to arrive than expected. Torn between the domestic equity market and the Treasury market, Canadian bonds declined a bit, but nothing to write home about.

The knock-on effects of tighter credit in the wake of the sub-prime frenzy are showing amongst those firms attempting to finance share buy-backs in the bond market. Bear Stearns, which has been caught up in this debacle more than it would probably like to, has indicated it will not be buying back shares, has paid up big-time to get some five-year money to reduce dependence on the money-market, and gotten rid of a high-ranking executive. Sounds like they’re taking things seriously!

The Fed statement today was notable for more than the usual reasons. There was a rare mention of the global economy, and its role in buying American stuff rather than selling cheap stuff to Americans. There is some further comment to the effect that American productivity growth is slowing. Meanwhile, there are rumblings that maybe Greenspan should be blamed for sub-prime and that US officials think the market is always perfect.

All in all, an interesting day!

Not the most active of days in the preferred share market, but at least trading was more inspired than it was Friday. InterestBearing issues did well and the PerpetualDiscount index continued what has been a fairly steady grind upwards since mid-July.

A number of Pfd-3 and worse issues did horribly, with YPG.PR.B, for instance, hitting a new low. It can only be detected over long periods of time … but yes, the preferred market does eventually  reflect the bond market! YPG.PR.B now yields 6.48% based on a bid of 22.60 and a softMaturity 2017-6-29 at 25.00 … not bad! At a conversion factor of 1.4, that’s equivalent to interest of over 9% …. but it’s a Pfd-3(high). Suitable only in very sparing quantities!

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.81% 4.85% 27,128 15.86 1 +0.2482% 1,036.4
Fixed-Floater 4.97% 5.01% 129,589 14.17 8 -0.0460% 1,023.7
Floater 4.91% 0.39% 72,604 8.06 4 -0.8811% 1,040.9
Op. Retract 4.83% 4.04% 82,423 3.32 16 +0.0513% 1,023.0
Split-Share 5.03% 4.57% 105,271 3.91 15 -0.1268% 1,047.1
Interest Bearing 6.25% 6.70% 62,501 4.63 3 +0.7609% 1,032.4
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.20% 102,767 5.65 24 -0.0325% 1,024.5
Perpetual-Discount 5.08% 5.11% 310,171 15.04 39 +0.0904% 976.0
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.K FixFloat -2.8306%  
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.0870% Continuing the recovery from Thursday’s loss. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.42% based on a bid of 9.30 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
RY.PR.E PerpetualDiscount +1.1008% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.91% based on a bid of 22.96 and a limitMaturity.
FIG.PR.A InterestBearing +1.1244% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 6.56% (as interest) based on a bid of 9.91 and a hardMaturity 2014-12-31 at 10.00.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
BMO.PR.I OpRet 75,550 Scotia crossed 74,200 at 25.00. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.07% based on a bid of 25.00 and a call 2007-12-25 (give or take a few days!) at 25.00.
BAM.PR.H OpRet 50,691 Desjardins crossed 50,000 at 26.70. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.04% based on a bid of 26.69 and a call 2008-10-30 at 25.75. It would appear that there are some who feel the privilege of early call will not be exercised!
GWO.PR.F PerpetualPremium 50,570 Desjardins crossed 49,700 at 26.85. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.52% based on a bid of 26.83 and a call 2008-10-30 at 26.00. Another bet on call-waiving!
CM.PR.I PerpetualDiscount 18,710 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.12% based on a bid of 23.11 and a limitMaturity.
BCE.PR.A FixFloat 18,298 Scotia bought 10,000 from National Bank at 24.49.

There were twelve other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Issue Comments

FIG.PR.A Partial Redemption

Better late than never! In a press release dated July 4, Faircourt Income & Growth Split Trust announced:

After giving effect to the redemption of the Trust Units, and in order to maintain appropriate balance in the fund between the Trust Units and Preferred Securities, the Manager announces that $45,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Trust’s 6.25% outstanding Preferred Securities (the “Preferred Securities”) will be redeemed on August 3, 2007 (the “Redemption Date”).

Interestingly, this press release is not to be found on the fund’s website.

The proportion of preferred securities redeemed is slightly over 25% of the total.

I noted the high yield available on this issue in the June Index Review – with the redemption, a lot of that yield has been received earlier than anticipated!

Update, 2007-08-11: The last commentary regarding this issue had to do with the DBRS credit review. There appears to have been some kind of oversight at DBRS – the issue is still “Under Review – Developing”

Market Action

August 3, 2007

It turned out that the end of the world, previously thought to have been cancelled, was merely postponed; a few proponents of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (strong form) received bruises in the rush to the exits but, as they themselves noted, they probably would have got them anyway.

The day started well for fixed-income investors, with the Non-Farm Payrolls report showing that 92,000 jobs were created while unemployment crept up a fraction. James Hamilton at Econbrowser says it actually be worse than it looks, since it does not go far enough to contradict his other indicators. Other reactions have been compiled by the Wall Street Murdoch is Magnificent Journal.

The report was weak enough that even hawkish economists conceded a rate-increase might be further off than anticipated so Treasuries had a great day, closely followed by Canadas.

This exuberance does not extend to lending money to actual companies, however, especially not those involved in sourcing, packaging and selling mortgages. Employees of such firms hoping to get work processing redemptions from hedge funds were disappointed when another European fund halted redemptions.

All this crushed US stocks, while Canada had to deal not only with the US news, but also the fact that it doesn’t look like we’ll be able to go work at Telus, either. So Canada got squashed.

Speaking of Telus, they released their quarterlies today, and noted:

TELUS in July continued its assessment of whether it should potentially make a competing offer for BCE. TELUS has concluded this assessment and it does not intend to submit a competing offer to acquire BCE.

I’m still not convinced that Teachers / BCE story is over yet. I have convinced myself, however, that the secret of happiness is putting oneself into a position of not caring. Which is to say, not holding BCE Prefs.

Meanwhile, the preferred share market simply continued not reacting much to anything at all, but there was one notable exception. The Argus Preferreds, AR.PR.B, are tracked by HIMIPref™ for the very good reason that about ten years ago they were in an index for ten minutes. They were down 63.69% today (bid/bid) on no volume, as the already pathetic bid vanished. To be perfectly frank, I don’t know off the top of my head who owns Argus. Is it the soon to be bankrupt Hollinger or the soon to be jailed Lord Black? Whatever … this issue hasn’t paid its dividend for over two years, so it will be of interest only to hedge funds and scrip collectors.

The post regarding Malachite’s recent performance has been updated with figures for DPS.UN and a joke, so read it again. Read it many times!

Note that these indices are experimental; the absolute and relative daily values are expected to change in the final version. In this version, index values are based at 1,000.0 on 2006-6-30
Index Mean Current Yield (at bid) Mean YTW Mean Average Trading Value Mean Mod Dur (YTW) Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 4.84% 4.87% 28,131 15.82 1 -0.1652% 1,033.9
Fixed-Floater 4.97% 5.02% 130,092 14.15 8 -0.3249% 1,024.2
Floater 4.87% 0.39% 73,752 8.22 4 +0.0206% 1,050.1
Op. Retract 4.83% 3.94% 83,551 3.44 16 +0.0450% 1,022.5
Split-Share 5.03% 4.49% 106,471 3.92 15 +0.2070% 1,048.4
Interest Bearing 6.29% 6.82% 61,292 4.63 3 +0.3859% 1,024.6
Perpetual-Premium 5.52% 5.17% 103,376 5.66 24 -0.0270% 1,024.8
Perpetual-Discount 5.08% 5.11% 313,647 15.31 39 +0.0577% 975.1
Major Price Changes
Issue Index Change Notes
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat -1.4622%  
BSD.PR.A InterestBearing +1.4333% Recovering about half of yesterday’s loss. Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 7.59% based on a bid of 9.20 and a hardMaturity 2015-3-31 at 10.00.
GWO.PR.I PerpetualDiscount +1.5922% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.95% based on a bid of 22.97 and a limitMaturity.
CFS.PR.A SplitShare +3.4895% Flight to quality with a vengeance! Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.40% (less than today’s gain!) based on a bid of 10.38 and a hardMaturity 2012-1-31 at 10.00.
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Volume Notes
ACO.PR.A OpRet 78,070 Global crossed 38,800 at 27.34 for cash at 27.34, then the same amount for regular settlement at 26.98. Ex-Dividend today for 0.359375.
BCE.PR.I FixFloat 26,640  
BCE.PR.Z FixFloat 16,978  
CM.PR.P PerpetualPremium 10,250 Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 4.85% based on a bid of 25.81 and a call 2012-11-28 at 25.00.

There were NO other $25-equivalent index-included issues trading over 10,000 shares today.

Zip. Zero. Zilch. There weren’t even enough issues trading in size to fill a table with five prime examples.

Index Construction / Reporting

HIMI Index Performance: July 2007

Performance of the HIMI Indices for July was:

Total Return, July 2007
Index Performance
Ratchet +8.24%
FixFloat +14.21%
Floater +0.06%
OpRet -0.10%
SplitShare +0.17%
Interest +0.03%
PerpetualPremium -0.03%
PerpetualDiscount +0.78%

Well – how about them fixed-floaters, eh? Or perhaps I should say “BCE Prefs”, since the FixedFloater index was comprised of eight issues in July, seven of which were BCE. It’s amazing what a generous takeover offer can do, eh? Especially since credit concerns had just about reached their peak on June 29 – the FixedFloater index was at 894.4 on June 29; above its low of 878.4 reached on June 11, but not by much!

The “Ratchet” index has been comprised solely of BCE issues throughout the period, but these fell less during the doldrums and hence had less ground to make up when Teachers’ gave the pref market its big boost.

As has been discussed elsewhere, the Claymore ETF returned -0.11% on the month; this number is after all fees and expenses and is after their rebalancing. I do not know what market action, if any, they took in order to reflect the index changes in their portolio … the current portfolio composition reflects at least some changes, but I do not know how completely the portfolio now reflects the index. It is also possible that they took no market action at all and the changes are due entirely to creation and destruction of units, with differing baskets. One can be reasonably sure, however, that changing their portfolio did not give their returns a trading-derived boost.

The same post has been updated with results for the other major passive preferred share fund listed on the TSX, DPS.UN. This fund returned (approximately; they do not report month-end NAVs) +1.38% on the month and -2.64% on the trailing three months. This fund has a higher weighting in the extremely volatile BCE prefs than does CPD.

Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund, actively managed by my firm, returned +0.55% on the month, +0.22% on the trailing three months. Returns assume reinvestment of dividends and are reported after expenses but before fees. Past performance is not  a guarantee of future performance. You can lose money investing in Malachite Aggressive Preferred Fund or any other fund.

The return of the “BMO Capital Markets 50” in July was +1.33%, but this will not be analyzed in detail due to the proprietary nature of this index. It should suffice to note that this index has a higher weighting in BCE issues than does the S&P/TSX index.