Category: Taxation

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: Manitoba 2010

E&Y have analyzed Manitoba tax rates as of 2010-3-31 and we may draw some conclusions from these data:

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 25.80% 0.00% 1.35
Professionals $75,000 39.40% 15.02% 1.40
Plutocrats $150,000 46.40% 25.10% 1.40

Equivalency factors have declined marginally since my 2006 post on this topic.

Two nuances should be noted. Firstly, E&Y appears to have put a floor of 0.00% on the published marginal tax rate for dividends; in fact, the tax on dividends can be negative if the taxpayer has other income available to soak up the excess dividend tax credit. This will increase the equivalency factor for “Widows & Orphans”.

Secondly, if the taxpayer is subject to OAS clawback, the equivalency factor will decline by about 0.1. It should be noted that this figure is an extremely rough estimate and is based solely on the direct income tax effect – there may be other net-income-tested benefits to the taxpayer, such as drug plans, which will exacerbate the decline.

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: Alberta 2010

E&Y have analyzed Alberta tax rates as of 2010-3-31 and we may draw some conclusions from these data:

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 25.00% 0.00% 1.33
Professionals $75,000 32.00% 5.80% 1.39
Plutocrats $150,000 39.00% 15.88% 1.38

Equivalency factors have declined marginally since my 2006 post on this topic.

Two nuances should be noted. Firstly, E&Y appears to have put a floor of 0.00% on the published marginal tax rate for dividends; in fact, the tax on dividends can be negative if the taxpayer has other income available to soak up the excess dividend tax credit. This will increase the equivalency factor for “Widows & Orphans”.

Secondly, if the taxpayer is subject to OAS clawback, the equivalency factor will decline by about 0.1. It should be noted that this figure is an extremely rough estimate and is based solely on the direct income tax effect – there may be other net-income-tested benefits to the taxpayer, such as drug plans, which will exacerbate the decline.

PrefLetter

Marginal Tax Rates: BC

An Assiduous Reader of PrefLetter writes in and says:

I believe your Equivalency Factors for taxes (Table 3 in Preletter March) are wrong for low-income earners.

The dividend credit can be applied to other income which results in a negative marginal tax rate on dividends. For example, for BC $30,000, 2009 tax year, this is -14.36% (regular income taxed at 20.06%) so
equivalency is 1.43.

This handy website will give you the marginal rate without capping them at 0% like the E&Y calculator does:

http://taxtips.ca/taxrates/bc.htm

The point is well taken – but unfortunately I do not consider taxtips.ca to be an authoritative source. According to their website:

TaxTips.ca is owned by a small private company located in Cedar, British Columbia. It is prepared by a husband and wife team who are retired from owning and operating a small business, with one being a retired CGA (Certified General Accountant). The goal of the site is to be a reference site for easy to understand tax, financial, and related information.

In order to consider a source authoritative I want to see names. I also want to see that the person making a claim has something at stake in the matter and is pronouncing on a subject on which they are earning a living. I consider it highly important in this wonderful world of looney-tunes in which we live that somebody maing a claim get hurt – either directly in the pocketbook, or (as in the case of academics) in reputation – if they make a mistake. And size helps (although I am realistic enough to recognize that it’s no guarantee): Ernst & Young, for instance, will have many opinionated partners who will jump on any egregious or doubtful claim because E&Y’s reputation is their reputation. While this means that many publicly expressed opinions get diluted to the point of uselessness, it does imply that what they do say has a reasonably good probability of being right.

So, while the Assiduous Reader’s claim has a ring of truth to it, I am – as I always stress – not competent on tax matters and am looking for an authoritative source to substantiate the claim. Any help will be appreciated.

Reader Initiated Comments

Tax Impact on FixedResetPremium Yields

Assiduous Reader pugwash asked on another thread:

The discussion ten days ago on this excellent blog about the impact of tax on premium bonds led me to consider if there is there a tax downside to owning premium resets.

How is the capital loss between the purchase price of say $28 in todays market and the call price of $25 dealt with?

Not many of us have capital gains to use as an offset!

He was referring to a comment by prefhound on my essay The Bond Portfolio Jigsaw Puzzle. And, naturally enough, his use of the phrase “excellent blog” virtually guaranteed a response!

In order to investigate the problem of tax effects, we need:

The last two requirements are permanently linked on the right-hand panel of this blog under the heading “On-Line Resources”. Note that we don’t really need the “FixedResets” version of the calculator; since we’re only going to be calculating yield to the first call, the regular version will do the same job; but we’ll use the souped-up version anyway. Why not?

Calculations will be performed for an Ontario resident with taxable income of $150,000. Ernst & Young claims the marginal rate on capital gains is 23.21% and the marginal rate on dividends is 23.06% (compare to the marginal rate on income of 46.41%, which is not used in this calculation).

pugwash specified a price of $28 for discussion, so for discussion purposes we’ll examine HSB.PR.E, which closed last night at 28.01-15. It pays 1.65 p.a. unitl the first Exchange Date 2014-6-30, when it resets to GOC5+485, or is called at 25.00.

The dividend rate of 1.65 implies quarterly payments of 0.4125. For taxable accounts, we will assume that this is reduced by 23.06% to 0.3173775. Dividends are paid at the end of June/Sept/Dec/Mar and the next ex-date is March 11 (estimated) so we’ll get the next dividend.

It should be noted that a horrifyingly precise calculation will not pay the tax on day of receipt, as assumed in the above paragraph, but pay annual taxes in the following calendar year. HIMIPref™ does this calculation, but the current calculation using the spreadsheet software doesn’t.

The maturity price is 25.00, which is all we need for the non-taxable calculation, but taxable accounts with capital gains will be able to claim the 3.01 capital loss until maturity. The tax rate of 23.21% on capital gains implies that this deduction will be worth 0.698621, so a taxable account with capital gains to offset the loss may use a maturity price of 25.698621.

Having accumulated the data, we can fill in the calculation spreadsheet:

HSB.PR.E Yield-to-Call Calculations
Data Non-Taxable Taxable with Capital Gains to offset loss Taxable without Capital Gains to offset loss
Current Price 28.01
Call Price 25.00 25.698621 25.00
Settlement Date 2010-1-28
Call Date 2014-6-30
Quarterly Dividend 0.4125 0.3173775 0.3173775
Cycle 3
Pay Date 31
Include First Dividend 1
First Dividend Value (if different) [blank]
Reset Date 2014-6-30 (irrelevant)
Quarterly Dividend After Reset 0.4125 0.3173775 0.3173775
(irrelevant)
 
Annualized Quarterly Yield to Call 3.43% 2.61% 2.04%
Effective Tax Rate 0% 23.91% 40.52%

Note that the calculated yield on the taxable account with no capital gains (2.04%) is a little harsh, because it does not reflect the fact that the investor will have a capital loss of 3.01 that may be used at some time to offset future capital gains. However, if he never makes any capital gains, this asset will be worth zero.

Note also that the effective tax rate for a taxable account with capital gains (yield of 2.61%, effective tax rate of 23.91%) is in excess of both the capital gains rate and the dividend rate. This is because the investor is paying tax up-front (when the dividends are received) and receiving the benefit of the capital loss later.

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: Alberta

E&Y have analyzed current Alberta tax rates and we may draw some conclusions from these data:

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 25.00% 0.01% 1.33
Professionals $75,000 32.00% 4.41% 1.41
Plutocrats $150,000 39.00% 14.56% 1.40

It is interesting to note that the equivalency factors have increased slightly since my 2006 post on this topic.

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: Manitoba 2008

Here are the rates from the E&Y Tax Calculator, as updated to include legislation to October 22, 2008. There has been a marginal change since my last post on the topic.

Clawbacks are not included; I am hopeful that at some point I will be able to get some authoritative data on the effects of clawbacks, but have not found anything credible … please contact me if you do know of any credible public sources!

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 25.90% 0.00% 1.35
Professionals $75,000 39.40% 13.68% 1.42
Plutocrats $150,000 46.40% 23.83% 1.42

There are some notes about the calculation of the equivalency factor in the comments to an earlier post about Ontario.

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: BC 2008 (updated)

Here are the rates from the E&Y Tax Calculator, as updated to include legislation to October 22, 2008. There has been a marginal change since my last post on the topic.

Clawbacks are not included; I am hopeful that at some point I will be able to get some authoritative data on the effects of clawbacks, but have not found anything credible … please contact me if you do know of any credible public sources!

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 20.06% 0.00% 1.27
Professionals $75,000 32.50% 4.40% 1.42
Plutocrats $150,000 43.70% 18.47% 1.45

Look at those rates, eh? The choice between interest and dividends is roughly the same as in Ontario at all income levels … but I look at the rate on dividends for “professionals” and I just can’t believe my eyes!

The comments to the Ontario update included some discussion of the calculation of the equivalency factor in the presence of the OAS clawback.

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: BC 2008

Here are the rates from the E&Y Tax Calculator, as updated to include legislation to May 8, 2008.

Clawbacks are not included; I am hopeful that at some point I will be able to get some authoritative data on the effects of clawbacks, but have not found anything credible … please contact me if you do know of any credible public sources!

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate on Interest Marginal Rate on Dividends Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 20.24% 0.00% 1.25
Professionals $75,000 32.50% 4.40% 1.42
Plutocrats $150,000 43.70% 18.47% 1.45

Look at those rates, eh? The choice between interest and dividends is roughly the same as in Ontario at all income levels … but I look at the rate on dividends for “professionals” and I just can’t believe my eyes!

The comments to the Ontario update included some discussion of the calculation of the equivalency factor in the presence of the OAS clawback.

Taxation

Marginal Tax Rates: Ontario 2008

Here are the rates from the E&Y Tax Calculator, as updated to include legislation to May 8, 2008.

Clawbacks are not included; I am hopeful that at some point I will be able to get some authoritative data on the effects of clawbacks, but have not found anything credible … please contact me if you do know of any credible public sources!

Investors Taxable Income Marginal Rate
on Interest
Marginal Rate
on Eligible Dividends
Equivalency Factor
Widows & Orphans $30,000 21.05% 0.00% 1.27
Professionals $75,000 39.41% 13.81% 1.42
Plutocrats $150,000 46.41% 23.96% 1.42

These figures are not much different from the 2006 numbers. The top marginal rate on eligible dividends is expected to increase to 26.7% in 2012; this would decrease the equivalency factor to 1.37. But frankly, I take estimates of future taxation rates with a grain of salt – we have no way of knowing what will be politically convenient next month, let alone four years off.

Taxation

Ontario Budget Favours Dividends

The Ontario Budget has just been introduced. According to KPMG:

On the personal tax front, Ontario maintains its original plan to increase the dividend tax credit rate for grossed-up eligible dividends, despite changes to the federal dividend gross-up factor and dividend tax credit rate on eligible dividends. As a result, Ontario’s tax rate on eligible dividends will effectively be reduced.

The 2008 federal budget announced changes to the tax on eligible dividends that would reduce the gross-up factor applying to eligible dividends received by Ontario individuals, beginning in 2010. Ontario proposes to maintain its plan announced in August 2006 to increase the dividend tax credit rate on grossed-up eligible dividends to 7.4% in 2009 (from 7.0% in 2008) and to 7.7% in 2010 and subsequent years.

Taking into account these changes, the top marginal tax rates applying to eligible dividends for Ontario resident individuals will be as follows:

Top Marginal Tax Rates for Eligible Dividends

 

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Federal

14.6%

14.6%

15.9%

17.7%

19.3%

Ontario

9.4

8.5

7.8

7.6

7.4

Total

24.0

23.1

23.7

25.3

26.7

In effect, the Ontario top marginal tax rate on eligible dividends will drop to 7.4% (from 7.8%) by 2012. Overall, the combined federal and Ontario top marginal tax rate on eligible dividends will increase to 26.7% (from 24.0%) by 2012.

The quoted top marginal rate is very different from the 30.19% in 2012 estimated earlier!