Market Action

December 2, 2010

The European emergency measures is being extended:

Under pressure from investors to lead the charge against the spreading sovereign debt crisis, Trichet said the ECB will keep offering banks as much cash as they want through the first quarter over periods of up to three months at a fixed interest rate. As he spoke, ECB staff embarked upon a new wave of purchases, triggering a surge in Irish and Portuguese bonds.

While the ECB chose not to deploy new crisis-fighting tools, Trichet managed to avoid sparking another market selloff four days after traders gave a vote of no-confidence to a bailout of Ireland. He kept up pressure on governments to fight the crisis by saying that “benign neglect” is not enough and indicated they could expand Europe’s rescue fund amid concern it’s not large enough to finance any bailout of Spain.

The yield on Portuguese 10-year bonds dropped 50 basis points to 6.13 percent and Irish yields fell 37 basis points to 8.76 percent. The Spanish 10-year yield declined 22 basis points to 5.07 percent. The euro traded at $1.3228 at 5:41 p.m. in London compared with $1.3152 before Trichet started talking.

Signaling disagreement within the 22-member council, Trichet said an “overwhelming majority” of officials backed the ECB’s Securities Market Program and that a “consensus” supported maintaining the status quo on providing liquidity. Bond purchases will continue to be offset to keep the money supply unchanged, in contrast to the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, he said.

“It’s not quantitative easing, we’re withdrawing all the liquidity,” he said.

The future seniority of ESM debt to public sovereign debt is cited as a potential trigger for a Greek downgrade:

Greece’s ‘BB+’ long-term sovereign rating was placed on “CreditWatch” with negative implications, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services said in a statement today from Madrid. S&P said it is assessing credit implications of the so-called European Stability Mechanism that may govern European Union sovereign bonds beginning in July 2013.

“Assigning ‘preferred creditor’ status to future official lending via the ESM could be detrimental to the ability of non- official holders of sovereign debt to be repaid,” S&P said.

The EU in October agreed on the need to set up the ESM as a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole. The Eurogroup, comprising the finance ministers of the 16 nations sharing the euro, said in a statement on Nov. 28 that “an ESM loan will enjoy preferred creditor status, junior only” to the loan from the International Monetary Fund.

Greece in May got a three-year aid package of 110 billion euros ($145 billion) from the euro area and the IMF to prevent a debt default.

The Icelandic model is being touted:

While analysts expect Iceland’s recession to extend into next year, the nation’s exporters are benefiting from a 28 percent drop in the krona against the dollar since September 2008. The decline may help the nation of 320,000 people rebalance its economy faster than Ireland, whose euro membership rules out a currency devaluation. With Iceland’s OMX share index up 17 percent this year, the third-biggest gain in Europe after Denmark and Sweden, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman says Iceland may be an example of “bankrupting yourself to recovery.”

“The difference is that in Iceland we allowed the banks to fail,” Iceland President Olafur R. Grimsson said in a Nov. 26 interview with Bloomberg Television’s Mark Barton. “These were private banks and we didn’t pump money into them in order to keep them going; the state did not shoulder the responsibility of the failed private banks.”

The insolvency was highly unpopular at the time – but a lot better for the world than the pretend sort-of insolvencies being touted by politicians.

In the meantime, it appears that the US still isn’t taking its fiscal deficit seriously enough:

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, a Democrat, and incoming House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Republican, said today they will vote against the plan tomorrow. They join Representatives Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, and Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat, in opposition.

The plan requires approval from 14 of the panel’s 18 members to forward it to Congress, meaning five “no” votes would kill it. Texas Republican Jeb Hensarling said today he is leaning against the proposal.

The recommendations are “wrong for Montana and wrong for rural communities across the country,” Baucus of Montana said in a statement. While reducing the deficit is “imperative,” he said, “we cannot cut the deficit at the expense of veterans, seniors, ranchers, farmers and hard-working families.”

Ideally, of course, Baucus will be dead, retired, or gainfully employed by the time the shit hits the fan. ABC News reports that it:

has learned Andrew Stern will vote no on the deficit commission’s plan to reduce the national deficit by nearly $4 trillion. Mr. Stern, the former president of the SEIU, has informed co-chairmen Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson that he will be the fifth member voting no, ending the commission’s hopes of officially passing the plan to Congress.

Two recent products to hit the Toronto market FFL / FFL.U and SST / SST.U are either craziness or genius. One or the other. The latter is the iPath® US Treasury Flattener Exchange Traded Note, which:

is linked inversely to the performance of the Barclays Capital US Treasury 2Y/10Y Yield Curve Index™. The index employs a strategy that seeks to capture returns that are potentially available from a “steepening” or “flattening”, as applicable, of the U.S. Treasury yield curve through a notional rolling investment in U.S. Treasury note futures contracts. The level of the index is designed to increase in response to a “steepening” of the yield curve and to decrease in response to a “flattening” of the yield curve. To accomplish this objective, the performance of the index tracks the returns of a notional investment in a weighted “long” position in relation to 2-year Treasury futures contracts and a weighted “short” position in relation to 10-year Treasury futures contracts, as traded on the Chicago Board of Trade.

The iPath® US Treasury Flattener ETN employs an index multiplier that provides the investor at maturity or upon redemption a participation rate of $0.10 gain or loss per each 1.00 point decrease or increase, respectively, in the level of the index. For purposes of calculating the closing indicative note value on a given day, the index multiplier is multiplied by the daily index performance, which is added to the daily interest that accrued from a notional investment of the value of the ETN at the 28-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, from which all applicable costs and fees are deducted.

On the one hand, this is a way for retail and small institutions to adjust their exposures without entering into costly trades. On the other hand, trading Treasuries is about the cheapest thing you can do in the capital markets. And retail’s lucky if it understands duration, let alone steepeners, flatteners and convexity. And there’s no related product to handle the 10-30 spread. On the other hand, I guess, if it sells, it sells.

CIBC debt capital markets division is doing well:

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ranks among the top three banks managing corporate bond sales in Canada for the first time since 2004, displacing Toronto- Dominion Bank as company issuance surges to a three-year high.

The bank’s CIBC World Markets unit ranks second this year after leading debt sales for companies such as Telus Corp. and BCE Inc. Royal Bank of Canada’s RBC Capital Markets is first, extending its streak of more than a decade as the top arranger, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Bank of Nova Scotia’s Scotia Capital unit ranks third among Canada’s six major banks.

Companies have raised C$69.4 billion ($68.2 billion) in bond sales this year, up from C$57.2 billion in all of 2009 and the highest since 2007, according to Bloomberg data.

The Toronto-based firm also raised about C$6.2 billion for its parent, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, the country’s fifth-biggest bank.

By comparison, TD Securities had one C$1 billion debt sale this year for its parent, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Canada’s second-biggest bank.

“When we look at things, excluding self-led deals, we see ourselves solidly in second place,” Brad Saunders, vice president of debt syndication at TD Securities, said in an interview.

It was clobberin’ time in the Canadian preferred share market today, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 38bp and FixedResets being hammered for an unbelievable (semi-believable, at best) loss of 58bp. Volume was extremely heavy; so heavy that the market maker for GWO.PR.J had to take the afternoon off – which cost the FixedReset index about a third of its apparent loss.

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0625 % 2,270.9
FixedFloater 4.78 % 3.43 % 29,483 19.16 1 -0.6114 % 3,520.4
Floater 2.62 % 2.36 % 53,048 21.36 4 0.0625 % 2,452.0
OpRet 4.79 % 3.87 % 83,592 2.39 8 -0.1150 % 2,375.8
SplitShare 5.47 % 1.28 % 121,853 1.01 3 -0.0937 % 2,458.9
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1150 % 2,172.4
Perpetual-Premium 5.70 % 5.50 % 156,073 5.40 27 0.0037 % 2,008.4
Perpetual-Discount 5.37 % 5.39 % 284,189 14.78 51 -0.3814 % 2,028.2
FixedReset 5.24 % 3.42 % 355,418 3.20 52 -0.5792 % 2,257.5
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
GWO.PR.J FixedReset -9.35 % This is just a stupid quote. The issue traded 2,831 shares in a range of 27.41-64 and the last of the eleven trades was at 3:33pm. The closing quote was 24.81-27.54, 4×9.

There is no excuse for this crap. Market makers get numerous privileges but are nudge-wink obliged ha-ha to maintain orderly markets and reasonable snicker spreads hee-hee. The Toronto Exchange should be investigating this and issuing a statement explaining this apparent gross dereliction of duty; and perhaps stripping the market maker of his responsibilities for this issue; perhaps extending some sanctions to the individual’s other issues and to the rest of his firm. If he was legitimately busy, or had a heart attack or whatever … who cares? That’s what algorithms are for and they can call a market with a latency of somewhat less than half an hour.

I have sent an email to the TMX (join in!) inquiring about the circumstances and repercussions of this quote. Who knows … if I’m lucky I might get a note from a clerk six months out of B-School thanking me for my inquiry, which is being taken very seriously.

Could we simply chalk this up to the vagaries of the capital markets? Could there be a good reason for this? Sure. Let’s hear it.

YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 24.69
Evaluated at bid price : 24.81
Bid-YTW : 5.52 %

TRP.PR.C FixedReset -2.20 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 25.30
Evaluated at bid price : 25.35
Bid-YTW : 3.96 %
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount -1.83 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 21.50
Evaluated at bid price : 21.50
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
BNS.PR.T FixedReset -1.66 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.29
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
TD.PR.E FixedReset -1.59 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.30
Bid-YTW : 3.65 %
RY.PR.L FixedReset -1.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.45
Bid-YTW : 3.74 %
RY.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.47 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 22.00
Evaluated at bid price : 22.12
Bid-YTW : 5.06 %
BNS.PR.X FixedReset -1.44 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.36
Bid-YTW : 3.59 %
GWO.PR.I Perpetual-Discount -1.32 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 20.93
Evaluated at bid price : 20.93
Bid-YTW : 5.38 %
SLF.PR.G FixedReset -1.21 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.30
Bid-YTW : 3.80 %
BMO.PR.N FixedReset -1.19 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-27
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.48
Bid-YTW : 3.35 %
MFC.PR.C Perpetual-Discount -1.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 20.21
Evaluated at bid price : 20.21
Bid-YTW : 5.59 %
BMO.PR.K Perpetual-Discount -1.09 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 24.28
Evaluated at bid price : 24.51
Bid-YTW : 5.38 %
FTS.PR.F Perpetual-Discount -1.08 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 22.68
Evaluated at bid price : 22.85
Bid-YTW : 5.39 %
RY.PR.A Perpetual-Discount -1.07 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 21.99
Evaluated at bid price : 22.12
Bid-YTW : 5.06 %
BAM.PR.T FixedReset 1.22 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 23.06
Evaluated at bid price : 24.90
Bid-YTW : 4.52 %
MFC.PR.D FixedReset 1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.60
Bid-YTW : 3.48 %
BNS.PR.O Perpetual-Premium 1.57 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-05-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.19
Bid-YTW : 5.60 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
CM.PR.L FixedReset 326,948 RBC crossed six blocks: 91,600 and 74,900 and 25,100 and 40,000 and 10,000 and 50,000, all at 27.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.90
Bid-YTW : 3.18 %
CIU.PR.C FixedReset 294,500 New issue settled today.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 23.13
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 3.56 %
BNS.PR.Q FixedReset 227,885 RBC bought 12,400 from anonymous at 26.18; Desjardins crossed two blocks of 100,000 each, both at 26.20.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-11-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.20
Bid-YTW : 3.40 %
CIU.PR.B FixedReset 209,316 RBC crossed blocks of 132,400 and 74,400, both at 28.06.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.86
Bid-YTW : 3.34 %
NA.PR.N FixedReset 104,100 RBC sold 19,600 to TD at 26.40, then crossed blocks of 60,800 and 19,000, both at 26.34.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-09-14
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.39
Bid-YTW : 3.30 %
BMO.PR.O FixedReset 87,121 TD crossed 74,300 at 27.75.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-06-24
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.75
Bid-YTW : 3.29 %
There were 77 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Issue Comments

CIU.PR.C Closes Steady on Reasonable Volume

CIU.PR.C, the 3.80%+136 FixedReset announced November 16, has settled.

The issue traded 294,500 shares in a very tight range of 25.00-05 before closing at 25.00-09, 10×10.

Vital statistics are:

CIU.PR.C FixedReset Not Calc! YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-02
Maturity Price : 23.13
Evaluated at bid price : 25.00
Bid-YTW : 3.56 %

CIU.PR.C is tracked by HIMIPref™ and has been assigned to the FixedReset index.

Index Construction / Reporting

HIMIPre™ Index Performance: November 2010

Performance of the HIMIPref™ Indices for November, 2010, was:

Total Return
Index Performance
November 2010
Three Months
to
November 30, 2010
Ratchet +3.81% *** +11.02% ***
FixFloat +5.65% ** +13.36% **
Floater +3.48% +11.02%
OpRet +0.29% +1.25%
SplitShare +2.98% +6.79%
Interest +0.29%**** +1.25%****
PerpetualPremium -0.32% +2.01
PerpetualDiscount +0.71% +6.91%
FixedReset -0.25% +0.77%
** The last member of the FixedFloater index was transferred to Scraps at the June, 2010, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the Floater index. The index was repopulated at the October, 2010, rebalancing
*** The last member of the RatchetRate index was transferred to Scraps at the July, 2010, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the Floater index
**** The last member of the InterestBearing index was transferred to Scraps at the June, 2009, rebalancing; subsequent performance figures are set equal to the OperatingRetractible index
Initial index values have been used until I run the precise index computations. Final values are not expected to be materially different
Passive Funds (see below for calculations)
CPD +0.23% +3.81%
DPS.UN +0.88% +5.49%
Index
BMO-CM 50 +0.65% +5.15%
TXPR Total Return +0.30% +4.13%

CPD still has a problem with tracking error – based on its management fee, the monthly tracking error is expected to be 4bp, but this month they came in at 7bp (which was nevertheless an improvement from recent values). The difference may not seem like much, but when these figures are annualized …

The pre-tax interest equivalent spread of PerpetualDiscounts over Long Corporates (which I also refer to as the Seniority Spread) ended the month at 220bp, a significant decline from the 235bp reported at October month end. Long corporate yields increased to 5.4% from 5.2% during the period while PerpetualDiscounts remained constant at 5.41% dividend yield, equivalent to 7.57% interest at the standard conversion factor of 1.4x. I would be happier with long corporates in the 6.00-6.25% range with a seniority spread in the range of 100-150bp, but what do I know? The market has never shown any particular interest in my happiness.

The increase in Long Corporate yields was most pronounced in the first part of the month:


Click for Big

Charts related to the Seniority Spread and the Bozo Spread (PerpetualDiscount Current Yield less FixedReset Current Yield) are published in PrefLetter.

The trailing year returns are starting to look a bit more normal.


Click for big

Floaters have had a wild ride; the latest decline is presumably due to the idea that the BoC will be slower rather than faster in hiking the overnight rate. I’m going to keep publishing updates of this graph until the one-year trailing return for the sector no longer looks so gigantic:


Click for big

Volumes are on their way back up Volume may be under-reported due to the influence of Alternative Trading Systems (as discussed in the November PrefLetter), but I am biding my time before incorporating ATS volumes into the calculations, to see if the effect is transient or not.


Click for big

Compositions of the passive funds were discussed in the September, 2010, edition of PrefLetter.

Claymore has published NAV and distribution data (problems with the page in IE8 can be kludged by using compatibility view) for its exchange traded fund (CPD) and I have derived the following table:

CPD Return, 1- & 3-month, to November 30, 2010
Date NAV Distribution Return for Sub-Period Monthly Return
August 31 16.78    
September 27 17.12 0.069 +2.44% +2.14%
September 30 17.07   -0.29%
October 26 17.21 0.069 +1.22% +1.40%
October 29, 2010 17.24   +0.17%
November 25 17.25 0.069 +0.46% +0.23%
November 30 17.21   -0.23%
Quarterly Return +3.81%

Claymore currently holds $582,195,003 (advisor & common combined) in CPD assets, up about $23-million (4.03%) from the $559,641,405 reported at August month-end and up about $208-million (55.78%) from the $373,729,364 reported at year-end. Their tracking error does not seem to be affecting their ability to gather assets!

The DPS.UN NAV for December 1 has been published so we may calculate the approximate November returns.

DPS.UN NAV Return, November-ish 2010
Date NAV Distribution Return for sub-period Return for period
October 27 21.12   0.00%  
December 1 21.33     +0.99%
Estimated October Ending Stub -0.17% *****
Estimated December Beginning Stub *
Estimated November Return +0.88% ******
*CPD had a NAVPU of 16.82 on September 1 and 16.78 on August 31, hence the total return for the period for CPD was +0.24%. The return for DPS.UN in this period is presumed to be equal.
**CPD had a NAVPU of 17.21 on November 30 and 17.20 on December 1, therefore the return for the day was -0.06%. The return for DPS.UN in this period is presumed to be equal.
*****CPD had a NAVPU of 17.21 on October 27 and 17.24 on October 29, hence the total return for the period for CPD was +0.17%. The return for DPS.UN in this period is presumed to be equal.
**** The estimated November return for DPS.UN’s NAV is therefore the product of three period returns, +0.99%, -0.17%, +0.06% to arrive at an estimate for the calendar month of +0.88%

Now, to see the DPS.UN quarterly NAV approximate return, we refer to the calculations for September & October:

DPS.UN NAV Returns, three-month-ish to end-November-ish, 2010
September-ish +4.39%
October-ish +0.17%
November-ish +0.88%
Three-months-ish +5.49%

Sentry Select is now publishing performance data for DPS.UN, but this appears to be price-based, rather than NAV-based. I will continue to report NAV-based figures.

New Issues

New Issue: TA FixedReset 4.60%+203

Transalta Corporation has announced:

that it has agreed to issue to a syndicate of underwriters led by CIBC, RBC Capital Markets and Scotia Capital Inc. for distribution to the public 8,000,000 Cumulative Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series A (the “Series A Shares”). The Series A Shares will be issued at a price of $25.00 per Series A Share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $200 million. Holders of the Series A Shares will be entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend yielding 4.60% annually for the initial period ending March 31, 2016. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at a rate equal to the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 2.03%.

Holders of Series A Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series B (the “Series B Shares”), subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2016 and on March 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series B Shares will be entitled to receive cumulative quarterly floating dividends at a rate equal to the three-month Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 2.03%.

TransAlta Corporation has granted the underwriters an option, exercisable in whole or in part prior to closing, to purchase up to an additional 2,000,000 Series A Shares at the same offering price. The Series A Shares will be offered by way of prospectus supplement under the short form base shelf prospectus of TransAlta Corporation dated October 19, 2009. The prospectus supplement will be filed with securities regulatory authorities in all provinces of Canada.

The net proceeds of the offering will be used to partially fund capital projects, for other general corporate purposes and to reduce short term indebtedness of the Company and its affiliates, which short term indebtedness was used to fund the Company’s capital program and for general corporate purposes. The Company may invest funds that it does not immediately require in short term marketable debt securities. The offering is expected to close on or about December 10, 2010.

Update: The market says “Super-Size me!”

TransAlta Corporation (TSX:TA) (NYSE:TAC) has increased its previously announced bought deal financing to $250 million. TransAlta Corporation has agreed to issue to a syndicate of underwriters led by CIBC, RBC Capital Markets and Scotia Capital Inc. for distribution to the public 10,000,000 Cumulative Rate Reset First Preferred Shares, Series A (the “Series A Shares”). The Series A Shares will be issued at a price of $25.00 per Series A Share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $250 million.

TransAlta Corporation has granted the underwriters an option, exercisable in whole or in part prior to closing, to purchase up to an additional 2,000,000 Series A Shares at the same offering price.

Market Action

December 1, 2010

S&P has put Portugal on watch-negative:

What Portugal does to combat downward pressures on growth and under what terms it accepts external support–if it does at all–will influence the government’s creditworthiness. The Eurogroup Ministers recently proposed treaty changes to establish a permanent crisis mechanism to be called the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which will be based on the European Financial Stability Facility. It is our understanding that the ESM may be designed to rank ahead of private creditors in any future debt restructurings beginning in 2013. As a result, debt that European Monetary Union member states issue might not rank pari passu with debt that the ESM issues. We think that this treaty change would represent a move away from the original design of the European Financial Stability Facility, which was intentionally exempt from preferred creditor status by the 16 members of the Euro Area in an effort to assist European Monetary Union members in financial difficulties.

I’m always looking for new perspectives, so I asked the question:

Why Issue Preferred Shares

Glad you asked…
Perferred shares are issued for a wide variety of reasons. One of the reasons why a preferred share may be issued is because people actually like these kinds of shares compared to other types of shares.

Nicole_Marie8201, Answers Expert

Well, I’m relieved to have finally cleared that one up!

Are politicians taking the US fiscal deficit seriously enough? Is the perfect the enemy of the good? If two deficit panel members are to be believed, the answers are “No” and “Yes”:

A panel vote set for today was delayed until Dec. 3. Bowles said yesterday he didn’t know if members will reach agreement on the proposal, which includes scaling back such popular tax breaks as the home-mortgage interest deduction. Agreement from 14 of the commission’s 18 members is needed to send a plan to Congress for a vote on whether to put it into effect. A failure to get 14 votes would kill the plan.

Representative Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican on the panel, said in an interview he will vote against the plan because it doesn’t do enough to address rising health-care costs. Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican, expressed the same concern and said, “I don’t know if you’re going to get my vote.”

Achieving the goal imperfectly and then merely having to tinker with the solution in place is just not sexy enough, I guess.

I had a laugh at the 7% targetted distribution of Quadravest’s Dividend Select 15 on November 26. In the interest of fairness, I think we should all now laugh just as loudly at Mulvihill’s Canadian Utilities & Telecom Income Fund:

The Fund’s investment objectives are (i) to pay holders of its Units (“Unitholders”) monthly distributions in an amount targeted to be 7.0% per annum on the NAV of the Fund; and (ii) to preserve and enhance the Fund’s NAV while reducing portfolio volatility.

The Fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing in a portfolio consisting principally of equity securities of large capitalization (over $1 billion) utility and, to a lesser degree, telecommunications issuers listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”).

The underwriter’s fee is 5.25%. dealers get a trailer of 40bp, and Mulvihill gets 1.1%; the total underlying performance required for a stable NAV is about 8.91% … not entirely unreasonable for equities, provided we ignore sequence-of-returns risk. And, of course, Mulvihill does not provide details of its track record in the prospectus, merely their experience.

PrefBlog salutes Emil Cohen who, despite the best efforts (and a little bullying) of the Toronto District School Board, has the makings of an independent and assertive young man.

In a further abuse of the right to due process, police can now impound cars for failure to make family support payments. Doesn’t this make everybody feel good? After all, the SIU now admits that their investigation of the police assault on Adam Nobody did not include such esoteric investigative techniques as talking to the guy who made the video (although it seems that in the last few days they have listened to a lecture on investigative techniques by Officer Bubbles).

Abuse of police authority? Cover-ups and grossly incompetent pseudo-investigations? A police spokesman claims the officers involved would be outraged at allegations that there’s any kind of cover-up going on, no sir, no way, ain’t never gonna happen, but remains unable to name the officers. Ah, well … here in the true North strong and free, abuse of power is rewarded.

There was continued high volume on the Canadian preferred share market today, with PerpetualDiscounts losing 14bp and FixedResets down marginally.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.37%, equivalent to 7.52% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.4x. Long Corporates now yield 5.4%, so the pre-tax interest equivalent spread is now 210bp, an apparrent, but probably meaningless, tightening from the 220bp reported at month-end (i.e., yesterday).

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.3762 % 2,269.5
FixedFloater 4.75 % 3.21 % 28,165 19.05 1 1.2826 % 3,542.0
Floater 2.62 % 2.36 % 52,963 21.36 4 0.3762 % 2,450.4
OpRet 4.78 % 3.48 % 61,361 2.39 8 -0.1292 % 2,378.5
SplitShare 5.47 % 1.65 % 122,561 1.02 3 -0.2602 % 2,461.2
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.1292 % 2,174.9
Perpetual-Premium 5.70 % 5.48 % 157,197 5.44 27 -0.0490 % 2,008.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.35 % 5.37 % 283,204 14.83 51 -0.1415 % 2,036.0
FixedReset 5.23 % 3.30 % 356,668 3.15 51 -0.0062 % 2,270.7
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BNS.PR.O Perpetual-Premium -2.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 24.57
Evaluated at bid price : 24.80
Bid-YTW : 5.71 %
BAM.PR.T FixedReset -1.80 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 22.96
Evaluated at bid price : 24.60
Bid-YTW : 4.59 %
RY.PR.B Perpetual-Discount -1.29 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 22.81
Evaluated at bid price : 23.00
Bid-YTW : 5.14 %
TD.PR.C FixedReset -1.27 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-02
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.51
Bid-YTW : 3.74 %
TDS.PR.C SplitShare -1.25 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-12-15
Maturity Price : 10.00
Evaluated at bid price : 10.30
Bid-YTW : 1.65 %
MFC.PR.E FixedReset -1.23 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-10-19
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.53
Bid-YTW : 3.83 %
SLF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount -1.11 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 20.52
Evaluated at bid price : 20.52
Bid-YTW : 5.49 %
SLF.PR.A Perpetual-Discount -1.05 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 21.62
Evaluated at bid price : 21.62
Bid-YTW : 5.50 %
GWO.PR.J FixedReset 1.00 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.37
Bid-YTW : 2.66 %
BAM.PR.B Floater 1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 17.80
Evaluated at bid price : 17.80
Bid-YTW : 2.98 %
BAM.PR.G FixedFloater 1.28 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 22.76
Evaluated at bid price : 22.90
Bid-YTW : 3.21 %
GWO.PR.H Perpetual-Discount 1.48 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 23.06
Evaluated at bid price : 23.29
Bid-YTW : 5.20 %
TRP.PR.C FixedReset 1.49 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 23.42
Evaluated at bid price : 25.92
Bid-YTW : 3.69 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
TD.PR.I FixedReset 88,430 RBC crossed three blocks, of 10,000 shares, 49,000 and 25,000, all at 27.90.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-08-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 27.88
Bid-YTW : 3.15 %
BNS.PR.P FixedReset 80,493 National crossed 40,000 at 26.22; GMP bought 30,000 from Scotia at 26.25.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2013-05-25
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.00
Bid-YTW : 3.46 %
TRP.PR.A FixedReset 75,399 RBC crossed 48,200 at 26.00.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2015-01-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.91
Bid-YTW : 3.55 %
GWO.PR.N FixedReset 75,018 Recent new issue.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-12-01
Maturity Price : 24.44
Evaluated at bid price : 24.49
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
HSB.PR.E FixedReset 68,597 RBC crossed 50,000 at 28.30.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 28.30
Bid-YTW : 3.14 %
TD.PR.C FixedReset 68,029 Desjardins crossed 13,000 at 27.05; RBC crossed 48,400 at 26.86.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-02
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.51
Bid-YTW : 3.74 %
There were 51 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.
Index Construction / Reporting

HIMIPref™ Index Rebalancing: November 2010

HIMI Index Changes, November 30, 2010
Issue From To Because
TD.PR.P PerpetualPremium PerpetualDiscount Price
CIU.PR.A Scraps PerpetualDiscount Volume
IGM.PR.B PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price
BMO.PR.H PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price
GWO.PR.L PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price
PWF.PR.H PerpetualDiscount PerpetualPremium Price

There were the following intra-month changes:

HIMI Index Changes during November 2010
Issue Action Index Because
CM.PR.R Delete OpRet Redeemed
CM.PR.A Delete OpRet Redeemed
GWL.PR.O Delete PerpetualDiscount Redeemed
SPL.A Delete Scraps Wound up
TDS.PR.B Delete Scraps Redeemed
TDS.PR.C Add SplitShare New Issue
GWO.PR.N Add FixedReset New Issue
Issue Comments

Best & Worst Performers: November 2010

These are total returns, with dividends presumed to have been reinvested at the bid price on the ex-date. The list has been restricted to issues in the HIMIPref™ indices.

November 2010
Issue Index DBRS Rating Monthly Performance Notes (“Now” means “November 30”)
PWF.PR.E Perpetual-Discount Pfd-1(low) -2.65% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.68% based on a bid of 24.26 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.I OpRet Pfd-2(low) -2.28% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 3.84% based on a bid of 25.75 an a call 2011-7-30 at 25.25.
BAM.PR.H OpRet Pfd-2(low) -1.74% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.13% based on a bid of 25.45 and a softMaturity 2012-3-30 at 25.00.
TD.PR.R Perpetual-Premium Pfd-1(low) -1.64% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.58% based on a bid o 25.20 and a call 2017-5-30 at 25.00.
BMO.PR.N FixedReset Pfd-1(low) -1.56% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 2.99% based on a bid of 27.77 and a call 2014-3-27 at 25.00.
MFC.PR.B Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(high) +4.80% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.52% based on a bid of 21.15 and a limitMaturity.
CIU.PR.A Perpetual-Discount Pfd-2(high) +5.09% Now with a pre-tax bid-YTW of 5.25% based on a bid of 22.00 and a limitMaturity.
BAM.PR.G FixFloat Pfd-2(low) +5.65%  
BAM.PR.K Floater Pfd-2(low) +5.94%  
BAM.PR.B Floater Pfd-2(low) +5.96% &nsbp;
Issue Comments

DFN.PR.A To Get Bigger

Dividend 15 Split Corp. has announced:

that it has filed a short form prospectus in each of the provinces of Canada with respect to an additional offering of Preferred Shares and Class A Shares. The offering will be co-led by RBC Capital Markets and CIBC World Markets.

The proceeds from the re-opening of the Company, net of expenses and the Agents’ fee, will be used by the Company to invest in an actively managed portfolio of dividend-yielding common shares which includes each of the 15 Canadian companies listed below. These are currently among the highest dividend-yielding securities in the S&P/TSX 60 Index:

The preliminary prospectus has all the numbers and dates of interest dotted out.

DFN.PR.A was last mentioned on PrefBlog when their secondary offering last spring raised just over $50-million. DFN.PR.A is tracked by HIMIPref™ but is relegated to the Scraps index on credit concerns.

New Issues

New Issue: CPX FixedReset 4.60%+217

Capital Power Corporation has announced:

that it will issue 5,000,000 Cumulative Rate Reset Preference Shares, Series 1 (the “Series 1 Shares”) at a price of $25 per Series 1 Share (the “Offering”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $125 million on a bought deal basis with a syndicate of underwriters, led by TD Securities Inc. and RBC Capital Markets.

The Series 1 Shares will pay fixed cumulative dividends of $1.15 per share per annum, yielding 4.60% per annum, payable on the last day of March, June, September and December of each year, as and when declared by the board of directors of Capital Power, for the initial five-year period ending December 31, 2015. The first quarterly dividend of $0.3308 per share is expected to be paid on March 31, 2011. The dividend rate will be reset on December 31, 2015 and every five years thereafter at a rate equal to the sum of the then five-year Government of Canada bond yield and 2.17%. The Series 1 Shares are redeemable by Capital Power, at its option, on December 31, 2015 and on December 31 of every fifth year thereafter.

Holders of Series 1 Shares will have the right to convert all or any part of their shares into Cumulative Floating Rate Preference Shares, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Shares”), subject to certain conditions, on December 31, 2015 and on December 31 of every fifth year thereafter. Holders of Series 2 Shares will be entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly floating dividend at a rate equal to the sum of the then 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 2.17%, as and when declared by the board of directors of Capital Power.

The Offering is expected to close on or about December 16, 2010. Net proceeds will be lent to Capital Power L.P. pursuant to a subordinated debt agreement. Capital Power L.P. will use the funds to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under its credit facilities which were used to fund the acquisition of Island Generation and for general corporate purposes.

Standard & Poor’s, a division of the McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. (“S&P”) has assigned a preliminary rating of P-3 (High) for the Series 1 Shares and DBRS Limited (“DBRS”) has assigned a rating of Pfd-3 (low) for the Series 1 Shares.

The Series 1 Shares will be issued pursuant to a short form prospectus that will be filed with securities regulatory authorities in Canada. The Offering is subject to receipt of all necessary regulatory and stock exchange approvals.

Looks expensive to me.

Update: DBRS assigns Pfd-3(low) rating:

Update, 2010-12-2: Note that CPX should be considered the same name as CZP for purposes of issuer concentration calculation, due to the close relationship between the companies:

CPI Income Services Ltd., the general partner of the Partnership (the General Partner), is responsible for management of the Partnership. The General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPI Investments Inc. (Investments). EPCOR Utilities Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, EPCOR) owns 51 voting, non-participating shares of Investments and Capital Power Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, CPC) indirectly owns 49 voting, participating shares of Investments.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership made cash distributions to CPC in the amount proportionate to its ownership interest. At September 30, 2010, CPC owned 29.8% of the Partnership’s units (30.6% at September 30, 2009).

and more specifically:

The Company’s power generation operations and assets are owned by Capital Power LP (CPLP), a subsidiary of the Company. At September 30, 2010, the Company held approximately 21.75 million general partnership units and one common limited partnership unit of CPLP which represented approximately 27.8% and zero %, respectively, of CPLP, and EPCOR held 56.625 million exchangeable limited partnership units of CPLP (exchangeable for common shares of Capital Power on a one-for-one basis) representing approximately 72.2% of CPLP. The general partner of CPLP is wholly-owned by Capital Power and EPCOR’s representation on the Board of Directors does not represent a controlling vote. Accordingly, Capital Power controls CPLP and the operations of CPLP have been consolidated for financial statement purposes.

The assets used in the operating business of the Company are primarily held through CPLP and its subsidiary entities. The interests held by the Company outside CPLP are not material to the Company’s consolidated operations, assets, liabilities and operating business or the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are primarily a consequence of the Company’s organizational structure.

It should also be noted that:

EPCOR, the power utility owned by the city of Edmonton, Alberta, plans to sell about $200 million (US$200 million) worth of stock in Capital Power Corp, a company it created through the spinoff of its generating assets in May last year.

Capital Power Corp and EPCOR said the offering would see 8,334,000 common shares of Capital Power sold at $24.00 each. The offering was to be handled by a syndicate of underwriters led by RBC Capital Markets and TD Securities Inc.

After the offering, EPCOR will indirectly own 61.6 percent of the common shares of Capital Power.

Underwriters have an option to purchase up to an additional 1,250,000 common shares at the price for further proceeds of about $30 million.

Market Action

November 30, 2010

Markets remain unimpressed by the Irish bail-out:

The difference in yield between Italian 10-year bonds and German bunds widened to 199 basis points after reaching 212 points earlier. The Spanish-German yield spread rose 17 basis points to 284 basis points and the yield premium for Belgian 10- year bonds reached 131 basis points, the most since January 2009.

Credit-default swaps insuring Italian government bonds rose 24 basis points to 270, contracts on Spain increased 16 basis points to 368 and Portugal climbed 12 basis points to 552, all record highs, according to CMA, a data provider.

DBRS has assigned ratings to Loblaw’s shelf prospectus:

DBRS has today assigned a rating of BBB with a Stable trend to Loblaw Companies Limited’s (Loblaw or the Company) new $1 billion Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus, dated November 25, 2010.

This prospectus will enable Loblaw to offer and issue up to $1.0 billion of debentures and second preferred shares during the 25-month period the base shelf prospectus remains valid. Additionally, DBRS has assigned a new rating of Pfd-3 to the Company’s preferred share portion of this prospectus.

Connor Clark & Lunn, best known for the default of their highly structured RPB.PR.A offering (among others) are reinforcing their effort (kicked off with the issue of HBanc Capital Securities Trust, discussed on October 13) to win the covetted PrefBlog “Most Ridiculous Family of Funds” award with the issue of Australian Banc Capital Securites Trust. It should do quite well; the underwriting fee on the Class A units is 5.25%, not that that will have anything to do with the success of the offering, of course.

Coincidentally, a team of analysts has commented on the Aussie Dollar:

Cricket’s oldest international rivalry resumed last week in Australia without a traditional taunt of traveling English fans: “We’re fat, we’re round, three dollars to the pound.”

The dollar chant “won’t be coming out of the songbook this time,” Barmy Army spokeswoman Becky Fairlie-Clarke said in a telephone interview. “It’s more like 1 1/2 now.”

It was a poor day for the Canadian preferred share market, with PerpetualDiscounts down 24bp and FixedResets losing 10bp. Volume was heavy.

PerpetualDiscounts now yield 5.41%, equivalent to 7.57% interest at the standard equivalency factor of 1.4x. Long Corporates continue to yield about 5.4% (maybe a little under) , so the pre-tax interest-equivalent spread is now about 220bp, a significant widening from the 210bp reported on November 24, although it must be noted that the spread has been bouncing between these two levels all month.

It is instructive to review the performance of the BMO Long Corporate ETF for the month:


Click for big

Long Corporates had a total return of about -1% on the month.

And that’s a wrap for November, 2010!

HIMIPref™ Preferred Indices
These values reflect the December 2008 revision of the HIMIPref™ Indices

Values are provisional and are finalized monthly
Index Mean
Current
Yield
(at bid)
Median
YTW
Median
Average
Trading
Value
Median
Mod Dur
(YTW)
Issues Day’s Perf. Index Value
Ratchet 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.3250 % 2,261.0
FixedFloater 4.81 % 3.46 % 28,565 19.13 1 0.0442 % 3,497.2
Floater 2.63 % 2.36 % 53,681 21.37 4 -0.3250 % 2,441.3
OpRet 4.78 % 3.39 % 62,105 2.40 8 -0.6087 % 2,381.6
SplitShare 5.45 % 0.42 % 123,529 1.02 3 -0.2064 % 2,467.6
Interest-Bearing 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 -0.6087 % 2,177.8
Perpetual-Premium 5.69 % 5.47 % 159,226 5.39 24 -0.2281 % 2,009.3
Perpetual-Discount 5.36 % 5.41 % 273,381 14.81 53 -0.2378 % 2,038.9
FixedReset 5.23 % 3.29 % 341,256 3.15 51 -0.1020 % 2,270.8
Performance Highlights
Issue Index Change Notes
BAM.PR.I OpRet -4.17 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2011-07-30
Maturity Price : 25.25
Evaluated at bid price : 25.75
Bid-YTW : 3.84 %
BAM.PR.O OpRet -1.22 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Option Certainty
Maturity Date : 2013-06-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.90
Bid-YTW : 3.89 %
RY.PR.C Perpetual-Discount -1.14 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-11-30
Maturity Price : 22.35
Evaluated at bid price : 22.50
Bid-YTW : 5.14 %
TD.PR.R Perpetual-Premium -1.02 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2017-05-30
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.20
Bid-YTW : 5.58 %
BNS.PR.Y FixedReset 1.77 % YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-11-30
Maturity Price : 25.19
Evaluated at bid price : 25.24
Bid-YTW : 3.40 %
Volume Highlights
Issue Index Shares
Traded
Notes
GWO.PR.N FixedReset 589,994 Inventory Clearance Sale
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-11-30
Maturity Price : 24.45
Evaluated at bid price : 24.50
Bid-YTW : 3.70 %
FTS.PR.H FixedReset 194,600 Nesbitt crossed 177,900 at 25.55.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2020-07-01
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 25.50
Bid-YTW : 3.76 %
GWO.PR.I Perpetual-Discount 62,260 Nesbitt crossed 50,000 at 21.45.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-11-30
Maturity Price : 21.40
Evaluated at bid price : 21.40
Bid-YTW : 5.35 %
BNS.PR.K Perpetual-Discount 58,105 TD crossed 50,000 at 23.80.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-11-30
Maturity Price : 23.39
Evaluated at bid price : 23.65
Bid-YTW : 5.12 %
RY.PR.I FixedReset 56,650 RBC crossed 20,000 at 26.25 and bought 15,000 from anonymous at the same price.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Call
Maturity Date : 2014-03-26
Maturity Price : 25.00
Evaluated at bid price : 26.21
Bid-YTW : 3.43 %
RY.PR.A Perpetual-Discount 51,980 Nesbitt crossed blocks of 20,000 and 16,000, both at 22.43.
YTW SCENARIO
Maturity Type : Limit Maturity
Maturity Date : 2040-11-30
Maturity Price : 22.25
Evaluated at bid price : 22.40
Bid-YTW : 4.99 %
There were 55 other index-included issues trading in excess of 10,000 shares.